[原発・フッ素52] ＜朝日新聞、１面トップ報道！＞除染せず避難解除、可能に　居住断念が条件　政府最終調整　福島原発事故　 赤かぶ
16. 2020年6月03日 13:33:03 : eIEvlwBKuY : em1WY3ZOSnE4TVk=[1]

これがフクシマのイマだ。ポーランド?の写真家が撮影したリアルフク
シマな33画像が世界に衝撃を
http://www.asyura2.com/15/genpatu44/msg/318.html
投稿者 gataro ?時 2015 年 11 ? 12 ? 20:22:53: KbIx4LOvH6Ccw

は検索不能？。

こちらは今のところ健在でした。
https://www.podniesinski.pl/portal/fukushima/
FUKUSHIMA
writing & imagery by:
ARKADIUSZ PODNIESI?SKI
16 wrze?nia, 2015
translated by:
Jon Tappenden

MADE IN JAPAN

When I visited Chernobyl for the first time 7 years ago, I didn’t think that a similar disaster could take place anywhere ever again, and certainly not in Japan. After all, nuclear power is safe and the technology is less and less prone to failure, and therefore a similar disaster cannot happen in the future. Scientists said this, firms that build nuclear power stations said this, and the government said this.

But it did happen.

When I was planning my trip to Fukushima I didn’t know what to expect. There the language, culture, traditions and customs are different, and what would I find there four years after the accident? Would it be something similar to Chernobyl?

THE DISASTER

This photographic documentary is not intended to tell the story of the events surrounding the disaster yet again. Like the incident that occurred on 26 April 1986, most readers know the story well. It is worth mentioning one very important aspect, however, which is an essential issue as we consider the story further. It is not earthquakes or tsunami that are to blame for the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, but humans. The report produced by the Japanese parliamentary committee investigating the disaster leaves no doubt about this. The disaster could have been forseen and prevented. As in the Chernobyl case, it was a human, not technology, that was mainly responsible for the disaster.

As will be seen shortly, the two disasters have much more in common.

RADIATION OR EVACUATION

Immediately after the disaster at the Fukushima power station an area of 3 km, and later 20 km, was designated from which approximately 160 000 residents were forcibly evacuated. Chaos, and an inefficient system of monitoring radiation levels, resulted in many families being divided up or evacuated to places where the contamination was even greater. In the months and years that followed, as readings became more precise, the boundaries of the zone evolved. The zone was divided up according to the level of contamination and the likelihood that residents would return.

Four years after the accident more than 120 000 people are still not able to return to their homes, and many of them are still living in temporary accommodation specially built for them. As with Chernobyl, some residents defied the order to evacuate and returned to their homes shortly after the disaster. Some never left.

http://www.asyura2.com/19/genpatu52/msg/725.html#c16