現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> Ψ空耳の丘Ψ２４ > 905.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> Ψ空耳の丘Ψ２４ > 905.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
●米国のアフガニスタン戦争や今回の対イラク戦争に利用された
2001年９月の“９・１１事変”は、「アラブのテロリストに
乗っ取られた米国旅客機が世界貿易センタービルとペンタゴンに
突っ込んだ」というのが公式シナリオとして流布されていますが、
このホワイトハウス発表の事件シナリオで決定的な役割をしてきた
のは「乗っ取られた旅客機内の乗客からかかってきた携帯電話」でした。
●ところがジェット機から携帯電話がかかるのかと根本的なところに
疑問を唱えた人がいました。
西オンタリオ大学の名誉教授（専攻は数学とコンピュータ科学）で
あるA・K・デュードニー氏です。
●デュードニー氏は、９・１１事変の「カミカゼ攻撃」について
大胆な代替仮説を唱えました。「空から降ってきたのは“オバケ”だった」
（Ghost Riders in the Sky）と命名したこのユニークな仮説によれば、
旅客機は結局、無線操縦で「カミカゼ特攻」を行なったのであり、乗務員
も乗客も事件が起こるまえにすでに皆殺しにされていた可能性が高い。
（その方法としてサリンのような毒ガスが使われた可能性も否定できない。）
ハイジャック犯人だと決めつけられたアラブ人たちも、事件後に生存していた
といった当局発表と食い違う矛盾も出てきており、デッチ上げの可能性が
高い……というものです。
●デュードニー氏の仮説は、政府の公式シナリオが作り話であるという前提で
立てられたものですが、その是非を決める死活的な争点は、はたして「旅客機
からの携帯電話」は本当だったのか、という問題になります。 そこで彼は
実際に携帯電話の利用可能性を検証してみたのですが、それによれば、
「公式発表にあるような“飛行中のジェット機から携帯電話がかかってくる”
ことはほとんどありえない」とのこと。
●下記に紹介する最新のプレスリリースは、つぎの言葉で締めくくられています。
「いやしくも“ジャーナリスト”を名乗る者は、９・１１事変をめぐって
噴出している数々の矛盾を真剣に調べるところから始めるべきだ。
おカミが下達し、科学的な調査ですでに破綻している“神話”を
オウム返しに唱えるのはやめるべきだ」
●なお、このプレスリリースには、次のような紹介者のメモがつけられて
いました――「最新の音声合成技術ソフトウェアをつかえば、本人の声を
短時間録音しただけのデータから、本人にそっくりの発話をデッチ上げる
ことができる。」
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
[note also advanced speech simulation software can perfectly imitate a
person's speech based on a short recording of their voice]
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/media_release_030304.html
9/11: The Enlightenment
Can Science overcome Myth? (in time to stop the next war)
MEDIA RELEASE 4th March 2003
Professor A.K. Dewdney, author of
'< http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/index.html >Ghost Riders in the Sky', has
< http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.html >released
the results of an experiment testing the feasibility of claims that cellphone calls were made from 'hijacked' airplanes on September 11th 2001.
The cellphone calls from hijacked planes were a crucial element of the 'official version' of the horrific events of '9/11', as they directly corroborated the notion that all four planes were hijacked by Arab terrorists.
Dewdney's experiment suggests that it is highly unlikely the cellphone calls took place as reported...
Dewdney's 'Ghost Riders in the Sky' hypothesis has been available on the web since early 2002. Now in its fourth version, it can be viewed
< http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/ghost_riders_1-4_1.html >HERE.
Dewdney is a Canadian Mathematician and Computer Scientist who holds the position of Emeritus Professor a the University of Western Ontario and has some 100 academic papers to his name. He proposes that the four 'hijacked' airplanes on 9/11 were taken over by remote control after all crew and passengers were disabled (probably killed by a poisonous gas such as sarin). Professor Dewdney further suggests that the 'Arab hijackers', whose identity has been shrouded in mystery since it was discovered that several alleged hijackers are in fact alive and well, were patsies.
A crucial objection to Dewdney's hypothesis has been the cellphone calls reportedly made from the 'hijacked' planes. These cellphone calls appear to substantiate the official version of events. If they took place as reported, Dewdney's hypothesis is clearly incorrect.
In version four of 'Ghost Riders', Dewdney went to great lengths to analyze the numerous reports of cellphone calls, and showed how they could have been faked and/or fabricated.
Now he's gone one better.
On Tuesday 25th February 2003, Dewdney chartered a light plane and flew up into the airspace above London Ontario - an area extensively serviced with cellphone stations. His goal was to test the essential feasibility of the claim that cellphone calls could have been made from planes at high altitude.
Dewdney's report on this private experiment, entitled 'Project Achilles', is
<http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.html>HERE
His report concludes:
"To the extent that the cellphones used in this experiment represent types in general use, it may be concluded that from this particular type of aircraft, cellphones become useless very quickly with increasing altitude. In particular, two of the cellphone types, the Mike and the Nokia, became useless above 2000 feet. Of the remaining two, the Audiovox worked intermittently up to 6000 feet but failed thereafter, while the BM analog cellphone worked once just over 7000 feet but failed consistently thereafter. We therefore conclude that ordinary cellphones, digital or analog, will fail to get through at or above 8000 feet abga."
The light plane used by Dewdney for the experiment could be expected to yield much better results for cellphone use than large commercial airliners of the type 'hijacked' on 9/11, because the carbon fiber skin of the test plane is 'radio transparent' and offers little attenuation of the signal - unlike the aluminum surface of a Boeing 757 or 767. If cellphones fail at a given altitude in the test plane, one may be confident they won't work at equivalent altitude in an airliner with a metal surface.
Dewdney's experiment suggests that if cellphone calls from 'hijacked' airplanes on 9/11 happened at all, they must all have occurred at very low altitude. This is inconsistent with the 'official version' of events.
The implications that 9/11 was a spectacular hoax are, of course, staggering. Many journalists and commentators may be reticent to dissect the official version of events, because to do so opens a veritable Pandora's Box.
If 9/11 was not carried out by Arab terrorists, the perpetrators clearly must have influence within the highest levels of the US Administration. Key elements of the mass media must also have been complicit in perpetrating the fraud.
Whoever was ultimately responsible for these crimes against humanity apparently intended, inter alia, to portray terrorism as a quintessentially Muslim phenomenon and trigger long-term western hostility towards the Arab and Moslem world.
With war looming in the middle east, justified largely on the basis of the events of '9/11', the immediate contemporary relevance of this possibility is self-evident.
Giving credence to this view is not, perhaps, conducive to a successful career in the western media. Nevertheless, journalists worthy of the title should start seriously investigating the many anomalies surrounding 9/11 - and stop uncritically regurgitating officially-sanctioned myths which fail to withstand scientific scrutiny. - ENDS
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。