http://www.asyura2.com/14/warb14/msg/127.html
| Tweet |
(回答先: NATO事務総長、ウクライナ危機におけるNATOの立場を表明 投稿者 手紙 日時 2014 年 8 月 31 日 00:31:35)
件名：プーチン大統領の人権委員会、誤ってクリミア住民投票の本当の投票結果を投稿 -- 併合支持は15%のみ
日時：20140506
媒体：在日ウクライナ大使館
引用：http://japan.mfa.gov.ua/ja/press-center/comments/1231-pid-chas-psevdoreferendumu-v-krimu-naspravdi-lishe-15-gromadyan-khotili-prijednannya-do-rosiji
-----
プーチン大統領の人権委員会、誤ってクリミア住民投票の本当の投票結果を投稿 -- 併合支持は15%のみ
06 5月, 05:16
市民社会および人権に関する大統領委員会Webサイトのブログに、ある文章が投稿されたが、まるで有害放射性廃棄物かのように直ちに削除された。
3月のクリミア併合住民投票に関する人権委員会の報告によると、投票率は最大で30%、そのうち併合への賛成票は半分のみ、つまり併合賛成票を投じたのはクリミア住民のわずか15%ということになる。
クリミアの運命は、ロシアとの併合に賛成する票を投じた15%のクリミア住民（カラシニコフ銃装備の兵士監視下で）により決定されたことになる。
西側メディアが報じたクリミア住民投票の公式結果によれば、83%の投票率で併合賛成票は97%である。
情報を整理すると以下の通りとなる
ロシア政府の公式発表
83%の投票率で併合賛成票は97%。つまりクリミア全住民の82%が賛成。
プーチン大統領の人権委員会が示した結果
30%の投票率で併合賛成票は50%。つまりクリミア全住民の15%が賛成。
プーチン派の人々により、この「若干残念な」報告は、人権に関する大統領委員会Webサイトから削除されたが、委員会メンバーのスヴェトラーナ・ガンヌシキナは、Kanal24（ウクライナのテレビ局）でこの件について語り、クリミア住民投票は「外国のスパイたちが望むよりもロシアの面目をつぶすことになった」と述べた。
プーチン大統領は、クリミア住民投票の茶番を、5月11日の「ドネツク人民共和国」住民投票で繰り返そうとしている。同様の手口を使い、「独立」のための圧倒的な得票と投票率を工作しようとしている。プーチン大統領は、ウクライナ東部住民がウクライナからの独立を希望していると、またも大嘘を使って、ロシア国民と政治家、および西側メディアを説得しようとしている。
西側は、今回もプーチン大統領の行動を大目に見るのであろうか？
By TCH / Published on May 4, 2014
-----
//memo
Russia-approved election observers in Crimea but no OSCE
By JewishNewsOne / Published on Mar 14, 2014
*OSCE(欧州安全保障協力機構)とは
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%AC%A7%E5%B7%9E%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C%E5%8D%94%E5%8A%9B%E6%A9%9F%E6%A7%8B
*OSCE NewsRoom
http://www.osce.org/press
*OSCE Chair says Crimean referendum in its current form is illegal and calls for alternative ways to address the Crimean issue
http://www.osce.org/cio/116313
*Crimean status referendum, 2014
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014
■OSCE and UN absence
On March 10, 2014 the de facto Prime Minister of Crimea, Sergei Aksionov, made an unofficial verbal invitation to OSCE to monitor the plebiscite.[93][94] However, later in the day, an OSCE spokeswoman said that Crimea did not have the authority to invite the organization into the region as it is not a fully-fledged state and, therefore, incapable of requesting services provided exclusively to OSCE members.[94] On March 11, the OSCE chair, Switzerland's Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter, declared the referendum as unconstitutional and therefore the OSCE would not send observers.[95] Uninvited OSCE military observers attempted to enter the region four times but were turned away, sometimes after warning shots were fired,[96][97] which was another reason given for not dispatching referendum observers.[98]
OSCE also published a report about their observations which "produced significant evidence of equipment consistent with the presence of Russian Federation military personnel in the vicinity of the various roadblocks encountered".[99]
The UN Human Rights Envoy Ivan Simonovic had to cancel his trip to Crimea as the current situation did not permit his travel. He intended to observe the human rights situation which was Russia's explanation for its engagement in Crimea.[100]
■Non-OSCE observers
Russian state-owned media and referendum organizers claimed that from nearly 70[101] to 135[102] international observers monitored the referendum without reporting any violations,[103] but objectivity of these has been questioned, because many of them had ties to far-right groups.[104][105][106]
The Crimean election spokesman Mikhail Malyshev reported that 135 international observers from 23 countries and 1,240 local observers were registered and 623 accredited journalists from 169 international media outlets were invited.[102][107][108][109]
The Ukrayinska Pravda reported that Russia formally asked all Russian-speaking European Union citizens and expats to become observers in Crimea while travel, accommodation and all expenses will be covered.[110]
According to Yale historian Timothy Snyder, the Russian government invited people from among European far-right parties to serve as observers.[111] At least some of the international observers were managed and financed by the Eurasian Observatory for Democracy & Elections (EODE),[98][112] a far-right Russia-based self-proclaimed election monitoring organization.[113]
Shaun Walker from The Guardian reported that during a press conference on the eve of the referendum, some of the aforementioned observers "went on political rants against U.S. hegemony in the world", describing the press conference as "rather bizarre".[e]
Exit-polls were allowed only for the Republican Institute of Sociological Research since, according to Russia-24, no other organizations have applied for accreditation for exit polls.[115]
■Allegations of fraud
A Russian journalist stated that she was allowed to vote even after admitting she was a Russian citizen with only a temporary one-year permit to live in Crimea[116] "According to all the laws, this is illegal," she said in one interview. "I am a foreign citizen. How can I decide the destiny of the Crimean Autonomous Republic of Ukraine?".[117]
The chairman of the electoral campaign of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People claimed officials failed to check carefully whether voters' names were on the electoral register and that some voters were bussed in to Bakhchysarai to increase participation rates in the city.[118] Mejlis also stated that only 34.2% of Crimea residents participated in the referendum.[119][120]
There were reports of people confiscating identification documents before the voting day. Simferopol city administration confirmed these claims and declared these actions unlawful.[121]
A senior US official stated there was "concrete evidence" of some ballots having been pre-marked.[122][123]
There were three Czech observers, a deputy Stanislav Berkovec reported that the voting was free and the foreign deputies could move freely. According to his dialogs with people even the Tatars inclined towards Russia.[124] Another deputy Milan Šarapatka reported that the referendum was formally regular and that there was no evidence of pressure on voters.[125] According to Miloslav Soušek (the Vysoké Mýto mayor), everything was standard, the course of the referendum was comparable to the elections in the Czech Republic, he saw no soldiers in the town.[126]
スパムメールの中から見つけ出すためにメールのタイトルには必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。すべてのページの引用、転載、リンクを許可します。確認メールは不要です。引用元リンクを表示してください。
