管極左反日はまだ安全だと毎日洗脳してるが。

多くの日本人が安全だと宣伝している在日政府マスコミの為に日本民族危機を知らないぞ。

日本人の子供は絶滅して韓国に占領されるのだろうか。

やつら在日の作戦なのか。

知ってるやつはいるか。

教えてくれ。

アホ。極左ではないわ。ネット右翼は来るな。

NaturalNews) It is nothing short of astonishing that the nuclear catastrophe we've all been told was "no big deal" has now escalated into the worst nuclear disaster in the history of human civilization. It's so bad now that soil samples taken from outside the 12-mile exclusion zone (the zone considered safe enough by the Japanese government for schoolchildren to attend school there) are higher than the 1.48 million becquerels a square meter limit that triggered evacuations outside Chernobyl in 1986.

In other words, the radiation level of the soil 12 miles from Fukushima is now higher than the levels considered too dangerous to live in near Chernobyl. This is all coming out in a new research report authored by Tomio Kawata, a fellow at the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan. That same report also reveals that radiation from Fukushima has spread over 230 square miles.

What we're facing here, folks, is a Fukushima dead zone where life will never return to its pre-Fukushima norms.

Radiation levels similar to nuclear bomb test site
Bloomberg is now reporting, "Tetsuya Terasawa said the radiation levels are in line with those found after a nuclear bomb test, which disperses plutonium. He declined to comment further." (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...)

One soil sample taking 25 kilometers away from Fukushima showed Cesium-137 exceeding 5 million becquerels per square meter. This level, of course, makes it uninhabitable by humans, yet both the Japanese and U.S. governments continue to downplay the whole event, assuring their sheeple that there's nothing to worry about. By their logic, since all the people are sheeple anyway, as long as the area is safe enough for sheep, it's also safe enough for the human population.

Both Japan and the U.S. have made huge efforts to raise the limits of allowed radiation exposure in foods and beverages. This was, of course, a deceitful tactic to try to reclassify radiation contamination as somehow magically being "safe" by redefining it.

The outright lying and tactics of deception that have been used to try to downplay the severity of the radioactive fallout from Fukushima are nothing less than despicable. In a time when radiation threatens the safety and food supply of hundreds of millions of people, we are getting nothing but a Fukushima whitewash.

Fukushima is now far worse than Chernobyl ever was and yet we're all being told it's no problem and that the government has it all under control. I ask: How is 5 million becquerels per square meter not a problem? It's amazing that we even got this information, considering how frequently TEPCO claims its sensors and meters aren't working (basically any time they get a reading that's "too high").

The Japanese government can't wait to corral the sheeple back onto the radioactive soil, by the way. "Basically, the way in which the current zones have been drawn up aren't a concern in terms of the impact on health," said Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano. "Using Mr. Kawata's report as a guide, we want to do what we can to improve the soil, so people can return as soon as possible." (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...)

Barely two weeks ago, TEPCO finally admitted Fukushima suffered multiple core meltdowns in the hours following the tsunami strike (http://www.naturalnews.com/032378_n...) (http://www.naturalnews.com/032437_F...). This was the first time TEPCO openly admitted to something the alternative media had been reporting for months.

What has become perfectly clear in the reporting on Fukushima is that:

• Governments lie to the people
• Mainstream media lies to the people
• Only the alternative media was correct in reporting the severity of the core meltdowns and the release of radioactive material into the environment.

That's why more and more people are turning away from traditional sources of (mis)information and instead relying on the alternative media to get accurate information about world events.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032568_Fukushima_dead_zone.html#ixzz1OHFM0lMp

ぼくにも決定打はありません。これまで想定された回答をあげておきます。順不同。国内の課題として：
a　福島の高校生が述べた、東北復興の要衝である交通網破断回避のための犠牲説。
a2 国の財政難に伴う福島市郡山市等、避難時補償不可能由来での避難指示不可説
・国内および世界的な課題として：
b　将来核兵器保有のための放射能人体影響データ保全説
b2　世界システムとしての各国各企業首脳陣原子力推進機構の枠組み維持説
（脱原発の世界的流れを阻止、核燃料再処理ないし増殖技術の確立、運用、輸出に
よる、現在の再処理技術欠損による放射性廃棄物未処理地獄回避説）
b3　米仏、国連、IAEAの強力な指示説つまり逆らえぬ見返りある人身御供。

いや、本当に分かりません。どれもそれらしく見えるとともにほんまかいなです。
ただ、山下氏は、話す場所・相手、メディアによって、正反対な意見をいいます。
福島市民に対しては福島県のアドバイザーとして安全安心を繰り返しましたし
朝日ジャーナル誌上ではこんな風に述べています。
https://twitpic.com/52aitv　赤線部分だけ転載します：

僕は飯舘や浪江、川俣の一部の数値の高いのを見て、自主避難ではだめだ、
きちんと命令してあげないといけない、といってきたんです。
国に対しては、30キロ圏外でも必要ならば避難させなきゃだめだと言ってきた
んです。（転載終わり）

まあ、穏健に解釈すれば、ひとりの医師として、避難の容易ならないのがほとんどだろう、放射線被曝の被害者である市民には、安全と安心を述べて
少しでも気持ちをやわらげたいのでしょう。他方、国に対しては
避難命令を出すよう助言もしたのでしょう。でも無駄だった。
国は頼れない、ならばできるのは、気を紛らす言葉を述べ続けること、
福島にあって想定されうる市民の今後の苦渋を、自治体代表として、
いわばともにすること、を選んだのかもしれません。

プルトニウムの飛散状況の発表が近いのかもしれないな。

-より低い懸念と対策いずれも過去の発がんリスク研究からいって
理論的根拠がない（だから対策がベター）。
-(well below concern and suggests no rationale for cancer risk studies.)