| Tweet |
(回答先: ハッキリ言って「この人達と同類と思われたくない。」 投稿者 考察者Ｋ 日時 2008 年 4 月 29 日 19:57:56)
リンク先とその分析
元のHPはリンク先が飛ばなくなっているから、又
リンクし直して公開
1700 Designated Ground Zeroes (DGZs)
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB108/
The National Security Archive at George Washington State University is an invaluable resource for all students and researchers of government malpractice.
The Nuclear Vault on the archive contains many documents detailing the history of US nuclear military activities. Their recent Electronic Briefing Book "New Evidence on the Origins of Overkill" describes the US military nuclear policy to bring devastating nuclear power to bear against over 1700 targets in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Vietnam and Eastern Europe.
The official language to describe a nuclear target was a DGZ - Designated Ground Zero.
New Evidence on the Origins of Overkill
First Substantive Release of Early SIOP Histories
By William Burr
Washington DC, November 22, 2007 - The first comprehensive U.S. nuclear war plan, produced in 1960, was controversial within the U.S. government because top commanders and White House scientists objected to its massive destructiveness ― the “high level of damage and population casualties” ― according to newly declassified histories published today by the National Security Archive. The war plan also appalled Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, who wanted to find ways to curb its overkill, but the first nuclear plan revised on his watch remained massively destructive.
“The SAC people never seemed to be satisfied that to kill once was enough. They want to kill, overkill, overkill, because all of this has built up the prestige of SAC, it created the need for more forces, for a larger budget. …. [T]hat’s the way their thinking went.” - Admiral Roy L. Johnson, USN (ret’d), Deputy Director of Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff (1961-1963) 6 December 1980 (Note 1)
I strongly recommend that you read this EBB for an insight into military nuclear "mentality".
One wonders what the Designation was for the WTC Ground Zero.
The Last Wave from Port Chicago
http://www.portchicago.org/lastwave/index.htm
1/10/07: This website has just come to my attention. It is one of the most important websites in the world. It presents the results of over 20 years investigative research by Peter Vogel, former Secretary of the Board of Directors of the New Mexico Energy Research and Development Institute.
His research shows that the first atomic test of the modern age did not take place at Alamorgodo on the 16th July 1945.
The first atomic test of the modern age took place at the US Naval Dockyard of Port Chicago, 30 miles north of San Francisco, at 10.30pm on the 17th July 1944.
Hundreds of US Navy personnel and civilians were sacrificed in a covert test to validate the theoretical models and evaluate the "combat" effects of a nuclear explosion on humans.
Donald M. Kerr, Director of Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory told Mr Vogel: "You will never be able to prove it".
In 1981, the Los Alamos archivist "who had come to Los Alamos in 1945 as the first postwar archivist when the only archived materials at the lab were those that had originated with the Manhattan Project" told Mr Vogel: "To understand that we could have done that to our own men, I had to remember that the men killed in the explosion were mostly n***ers."
The bitter truth is revealed. From sending soldiers to walk towards atmospheric nuclear fireballs; to nuclear test holidays in Las Vegas; to injecting prisoners with radioactive materials; to considering those living downwind of Hanford as economically unimportant; to spraying the Middle East and Balkans with "Depleted" Uranium - the very first atomic bomb explosion started the Atomic Age as they intended to continue it: by treating human beings as disposable laboratory animals.
To vapourise 3,000 people and contaminate the whole of New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout is just a logical continuation of a long line of such "experiments".
Who - or What - are these patently Inhuman "They" who have been perpetrating this Nuclear Holocaust upon humanity for over 60 years?
Environmental Studies of the World Trade Centre Area after the September 11, 2001 Attack
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
This link is to the Forensic Data which proves that the WTC was subjected to intense nuclear explosions.
On September 17th and 18th 2001, two scientists from the USGS collected samples of dust from Lower Manhattan where it had been deposited by the collapse. Their report OFR-01-0429 was published on November 27th 2001.
This link is to the table of data showing the concentration of different elements in the dust, including unprecedented quantities of Strontium, Barium, Cerium, Lanthanum and Yttrium.
Project Gabriel
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/meet11/brief11/tab_i/br11i1a.txt
This is a useful document from the National Security Archive at George Washington University. It is a document from the 1950s on Project Gabriel - a project to determine how nuclear fallout from US atomic bomb tests is distributed across the world and the biological uptake of fallout products.
The uptake of Strontium 90 in children’s milk teeth was used to monitor fallout across the world up to the 1980s. Few countries now continue this practice, since Sr 90 levels had been continually falling since the ending of atmospheric atomic bomb tests in the 1960s. However, in 2003 it was reported that the levels of Sr 90 in US children’s milk teeth had started to rise again, from the scattered monitoring still going on. There can only be one explanation for this - SR 90 is being released into the atmosphere again from clandestine atmospheric nuclear explosions. The Indian and Pakistan tests were contained underground and could not release SR 90 into the environment.
This rise in SR 90 levels is proof that clandestine atmospheric nuclear explosions are taking place. If “Ground Zero: WTC” was not the only source, it is certainly one of the sources.
“A theoretical analysis of the long range aspects of GABRIEL was made in 1949 by Dr. Nicholas M. Smith, Jr., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, at the request of the Atomic Energy Commission. Smith concluded that Sr-90 is by far the most hazardous isotope resulting from nuclear detonations...”
Controlled Demolition Inc.
http://www.controlled-demolition.com/
Controlled Demolition Inc. are by now well known in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading experts on the subject of controlled demolitions. Many have inferred that their involvement in the clean-up operation after 911 is evidence that they were involved in setting up the building for demolition beforehand. I think this is unlikely. I base this on the revealing interview given by Mr Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI, to New Scientist magazine published on July 24th 2004. This interview should be read by all 911 researchers - salient extracts are in the "Ground Zero" report.
CDI's web site presents many photographs of controlled demolitions in progress. The sequence of photographs taken during the demolition of a building in Sao Paulo show very clearly the famous "squibs" firing out of upper floors at the beginning of the operation, similar to those seen at the WTC.
There is no doubt that conventional demolition charges were used in the Twin Towers. Why do this if the towers are going to be destroyed by nuclear devices? The pre-positioned conventional charges could not possibly have any controlling effect on the power of the nuclear blast.
The reason - Layers of Deep Black Cover. They know that anyone looking at it afterwards with any intelligence will see the towers were blown up with enormous force. But they do not want anyone to suspect it was a nuclear device. So they cover it with evidence of a conventional controlled demolition. This diverts attention away from the fact that they were not simply imploded but volcanically exploded, from the top down.
The military use different levels of secrecy and cover stories to mount "Black Ops". One set of operatives are given one reason for what they are doing. Another team, with no mutual knowledge of the other teams, is given a different set of tasks with a different cover story and so on. Everything is compartmentalised on a "need to know" basis so nobody has the complete picture except a few pulling the strings at the top.
One team, for example, may have been assigned to electronically hijack the aircraft or direct the "drones" by electronic remote control. They think the new "Gulf of Tonking" attack will be limited to the aircraft crashes. Level One. Another is assigned to plant the charges, under pretence of an anti-terrorist exercise. Another squad know it's for real and oversee it. They don't know it's going to be nuked. Level Two. The "elite" nuclear demolition team set up what they think are "SADMs" - Small Atomic Demolition Munitions - joking about how "Saddam" will be blamed. Level Three. They don't know that clandestine reactors are going to be sent super-critical. Level Four.
On the day, each team does its job in sequence - unaware that even greater perfidy will follow, executed by an even Blacker team. Afterwards, people who realise they have been used can be liquidated. Even the "patriots" who were prepared to go along with a conventional demolition, to "wake the Americans up for their own good", might have balked at contaminating New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout.
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。