| Tweet |
「WTC倒壊に、純粋水爆が使用されたのではないか？｣と疑う911eyewitnessからの質問状に答えないジョーンズ教授。いや、答えられないのであろう。ジョーンズ教授は、常温核融合の権威。常温核融合は、実現していれば、水爆の起爆に使える。しかも、放射能のフォールアウトがないから、従来の観念では、水爆が使われたとは解らない。放射能は出ないが起爆時に放射線は照射されるから、中性子線被爆で、事後5年たって、白血病や脳腫瘍が多発する。実際300人が発癌している。既になくなった33人の警察官消防隊員が、水爆使用の証拠そのものだ。
現場の粉塵や地下水で発見されたトリチウム値の上昇は、当初、突入機の出口灯に使用されていたトリチウムが原因だと説明された。だが、｢使用されていなかった｣と判明した。そうなると水素の放射性同位体であるトリチウム(三重水素）値が上昇したことは、｢水爆の使用｣以外では説明がつかない。
そのトリチウムを、粉塵に含まれる鉄粉などと一緒に体内に取り込むと、呼吸器や消火器に沈着残留し、10年以上の間、ベータ線を照射し続ける。当然、呼吸器の機能を妨げる。呼吸困難になる。これが、｢呼吸機能の低下｣が主たる症状であるWTC症候群の真因ではないのか？
23 Questions For Steven Jones on WMD at WTC and No Answers
http://www.911eyewitness.com/truth/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=63
Dear Prof. Jones,
Thank you for your prompt reply to my initial letter outlining 23 evidence points for fusion weapons at the WTC. It has been over one week and I have not received any response to my follow up letter. Perhaps you have been very busy with other matters. On the chance that you did not receive it I will send it again.
この分野の
With all due respect to your expertise in this area, can metal and dust samples given to you four years after 9.11.2001 to test be trusted as genuine and considered conclusive proof that fusion did not occur?
Could traces of thermite be explained away as standard preparation for future demolition? i.e. The fireball might have activated some of the thermite installed during renovation for future demolition and therefore we see one small example falling from near the south tower damage zone.
Additionally, can we be 100% certain that no thermite was used to bring down the remaining structures during clean up operations?
Realistically, if thermite/thermate alone was responsible for cutting 240+ external steel beams on multiple floors of both towers, shouldn't we find more than one video clip of one isolated example?
In the same spirit of scientific method and peer revue of your paper and thermite hypothesis, please help me refine the 911 Eyewitness seven laws of science and this fusion hypothesis.
Fusion is your specialty and if my 23 point evidence list is incorrect then I would appreciate your expert comment on why each item is invalid. If you would be so kind, I have a few additional questions as well.
1. How long would fusion radioactivity remain detectable?
2. Can lack of radioactivity in your samples be due to any form of treatment or "cleaning"?
3. What would you look for specifically in your sample of molten steel to detect fusion other than radiation?
4. How did you measure the iron isotope variances in your sample?
5. What ratio measurements did you get for Fe54, Fe56 & Fe57?
6. What should we expect to find in the dust studies if fusion weaponry was used?
7. How can we explain the high tritium levels in the WTC ground water?
8. Since WTC exit signs did not contain tritium as first claimed, is the current official explanation of a few EXIT signs from commercial jets plausible in your opinion?
9. How can we explain the complete pulverization of concrete, ultra-fine particles in the dust and metals in atomic sizes?
9. What is your understanding of the current capability of 5th generation fusion weapons?
10. Shall I use "molecular dissociation" instead of "pulverization" as a more correct terminology to describe what happened at the WTC?
If you can rule out fusion weaponry with a high degree of certainty, please help me explain the 23 evidence points I have listed with an alternative hypothesis.
Given the broadcast footage of a bunker buster missile emerging from the north side of the south tower at the moment of the fireball, as recently featured in the "Fooled Again on 911" trailer shown at the Los Angeles conference, perhaps "no commercial planes" would provide a middle ground for agreement that would help to resolve the current split in opinion.
Certainly, no 9.11 documentaries should continue to reinforce the official story of UA175 hitting the south tower. Perhaps "military aircraft" would be sufficient to undermine the official story.
I think most 9.11 researchers would now agree that some form of MSM involvement was necessary to complete the illusion of terror at the WTC. So the hypothesis of "TV fakery" should not be disregarded even if the technical elements are not clearly understood at this point in time.
As an expert in fusion, your valuable comments will be greatly appreciated by all 9.11 researchers.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
David
--- Steve Jones > David, Note: Please note that there were plenty of unexplained radioactives in the dust samples according to NIST and other studies. Never hidden these pieces of evidence are piling up for WMD at the WTC. スティーブン・ジョーンズ教授への公開質問状 （９１１EYEWITNESS） Re: WTCで核融合装置が使われた証拠 Re: WTC小型水爆倒壊説の検証
>
> I have studied nuclear fusion my entire career in
> Physics.
> Fusion produces copious amounts of high-energy
> neutrons. These
> neutrons will make radioactive ("activate")
> substances they encounter,
> such as steel and other metals, as well as dirt,
> dust, etc. Then we
> can test these materials for radioactivity -- this
> is the crucial
> experiment for the use of nuclear weapons/bombs.
>
> I have done this. There was NO radioactivity above
> background in the
> solidified molten metal nor in the WTC dust. My
> results are presented
> herein:
> NEW (July 18, 2006): "Answers to Objections and
> Questions" by Prof.
> Jones:
>
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/AnsQJones1.pdf
>
> Thus, with a VERY high degree of confidence, we can
> rule out the use
> of fusion weaponry in the WTC.
http://www.asyura2.com/0601/war83/msg/137.html
投稿者 ブッシュ親子の自作自演テロの１１
http://www.asyura2.com/0601/war83/msg/139.html
投稿者 ブッシュ親子の自作自演テロの１１
http://www.asyura2.com/0601/war83/msg/140.html
投稿者 ブッシュ親子の自作自演テロの１１
投稿コメント全ログ
コメント即時配信
スレ建て依頼
削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。