現在地 HOME > ホロコースト1 > 630.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
(回答先: ネグリのスポンサーも多国籍企業家=金融支配層:シオニストのようだ 投稿者 ぷち熟女 日時 2005 年 3 月 16 日 07:06:28)
あたくしが引用した英文のうち、
ブロガー自身の記述部分と
彼が引用したガーディアン紙掲載のハート教授の記述部分との区別が出来ず
紛らわしいので、もう一度英文全体を引用し直します。
====================================================================
http://www.atlanticblog.com/archives/2002_12.html
Wednesday, December 18, 2002
『Silly professor watch』
Remember Antonio Negri, the Red Brigade member now locked up in an Italian prison? He wrote Empire with Michael Hardt, an English professor at Duke. The
combination of a Red Brigade terrorist and a Duke English professor suggested to me a book not worth my time, so I took the reviews pretty much at face value.
In today's Guardian, Hardt rants about US imperialism. It is a charming mix of silliness and bad writing:
『Many political and economic elites around the world, however, do not favour the creation of a new US imperialism. One common view is that European political
leaders generally oppose US unilateralism because it excludes them and prefer instead multilateral political and military solutions. What are most significant,
however, are not the conflicting interests that separate US elites from others, but rather their common interests.
The common interests of the global elites are most visible in the economic sphere. Business leaders around the globe recognise that imperialism is bad for
business because it sets up barriers that hinder global flows. The potential profits of capitalist globalisation, which whet the appetites of business elites
everywhere only a few years ago, depend on open systems of production and exchange. This is equally true for the captains of capital in the US. Even for the US industrialists drunk on oil, their real interests lie in the potential profits of capitalist globalisation.』
I have the comfort of knowing I made good use of my time by taking a pass on Empire.
====================================================================