現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争58 > 574.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争58 > 574.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
| Tweet |
(回答先: イスラエル、ゴラン高原放棄の可能性？何をたくらんどるんだ？ 投稿者 バルセロナより愛を込めて 日時 2004 年 8 月 14 日 06:39:37)
平和を望むイスラエル、という夏のジョークである。
A Syrian political analyst for various Arab newspapers, Imad Fawzi al-Shueibi, said Ya'alon's statement was "meaningless militarily because it proves an evident truth."He accused the army chief of trying to distract attention from what he claimed was an Israeli plan to strike Iran's first nuclear reactor, which is close to coming online.
"What is happening now is preparing for an Israeli military operation to hit the Iranian nuclear reactor as both the United States and Israel are talking about the dangers of Iranian nuclear power," al-Shueibi said.
Last Update: 14/08/2004 11:34
Syria rebuffs IDF chief on Golan Height withdrawal
By Haaretz Service and The Associated Press
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/464491.html
Syria will not take seriously Israeli offers to pull out of the Golan Heights unless they are backed by moves on the ground or an open commitment to withdraw, an advisor to the Syrian information minister said Friday.
Ahmad Haj Ali was responding to comments by Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Moshe Ya'alon, who told the Yedioth Ahranoth newspaper Friday that there was no military reason why Israel could not withdraw to the border Israel shared with Syria before the 1967 Six-Day War.
"If you ask me, theoretically, if we can reach an agreement with Syria... my answer is that from a military standpoint it is possible to reach an agreement by giving up the Golan Heights," Ya'alon said.
"The army is able to defend any border. This is correct for any political decision that is taken in Israel," he added.
But Ya'alon also warned that Syria still poses a threat to Israel and that the two countries could once again find themselves engaged in a war. He noted that Syria has "missiles that put all of Israel in range and chemical capabilities."
Former defense minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer criticized Ya'alon for his comments Friday, Channel 2 television reported, saying that remarks were "political statements inappropriate for military personnel."
Haj Ali was not impressed by Yaalon's comment, telling The Associated Press: "We don't give such statements any weight unless they are associated with a serious move [toward peace] and with international guarantees."
"Whoever is willing to make peace should return the land to its owners and withdraw immediately or declare that openly and clearly," he added.
Haj Ali said he believed Ya'alon's statement was designed to "show Israel was the party seeking peace in order to look good in the upcoming American elections."
A Syrian political analyst for various Arab newspapers, Imad Fawzi al-Shueibi, said Ya'alon's statement was "meaningless militarily because it proves an evident truth."
He accused the army chief of trying to distract attention from what he claimed was an Israeli plan to strike Iran's first nuclear reactor, which is close to coming online.
"What is happening now is preparing for an Israeli military operation to hit the Iranian nuclear reactor as both the United States and Israel are talking about the dangers of Iranian nuclear power," al-Shueibi said.
The United States and Israel strongly suspect that Iran is developing a nuclear bomb under cover of a nuclear program to generate electricity. Iran has denied the charge.
In 1981, Israeli fighter-bombers destroyed a nuclear reactor under construction outside Baghdad because it feared Iraq would acquire a nuclear weapon.
Israeli-Syrian peace talks have not taken place since 2000 when then-Syrian President Hafez Assad rejected former Prime Minister Ehud Barak's offer to withdraw from almost all of the Golan, insisting on a complete withdrawal.
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。