現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争57 > 338.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
Tweet |
(回答先: 現アブドゥラ国王とラニア王妃は英米イスラエルには大変都合が良い存在。 投稿者 Sちゃん 日時 2004 年 7 月 03 日 16:36:10)
ハシミテ王家は預言者ムハンマドの直系の子孫と云う由緒正しい家柄。
どうも英米こぞって、このハシミテ王家を新中東構想「親イスラエルの統一アラブ連合」の核に据えるべく、いろいろ動いていた模様。
「彼ら」としては、この「由緒正しい家柄の王族が統治する植民地主義」がお好きなのでしょう。
(日本の倒幕と天皇制復活に裏で関っていたのもそんな感じなのでしょう)
●前ヨルダン国王 フセイン1世は4人の妻がいた。
●最初の妻は遠い従姉妹に当たる年上の女性ディーナ王妃で、王女1人が生まれた後、離婚。
●2番目の妻は英国軍人の娘で、このムーナ王妃(アラブ名)が現ヨルダン国王 アブドゥラ2世の母親に当たる。
ムーナ王妃とは1962年に結婚し、1972年に離婚している。
●3番目の妻であるアーリア王妃と1972年に結婚。最も愛した王妃と言われ国際空港にこの王妃の名前を付けている。
元ヨルダンの大使Bahauddin Toukanの娘とのこと。
この2人の間に生まれたアリ王子と最近結婚したのが国連顧問のブラヒミの娘。
同じくこの2人の間に生まれたハヤ王女は、ドバイの皇太子http://www.sheikhmohammed.ae/と今年4月に婚約。
1977年、ヘリの事故で王妃は死亡。これが本当に事故だったのかどうか、ちょいと臭いますね。
●その後1978年に結婚した4番目の妻 ノール王妃はアラブ系アメリカ人。
彼女が生んだハムザ王子が後を継ぐのではないかととも囁かれていたが、18歳と云う若さのためアウト。
ところが、それだけではなく、このノール王妃は、プロパレスチニアンで反イスラエルであると
かのADLがバッシングの対象にしている人物でもある。(転載は下に)
http://www.adl.org/israel/queen_noor.asp
反シオニストでシャロン、ネタニヤフが嫌い。
イスラエルのテロリズムに対する防衛に理解を示す。などなどなど。
英米イスラエルとしては彼女の影響力を排除したい。
おそらくこれが、ハムザ王子後継アウトの本当の理由でしょう。
フセイン1世公式サイト
http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/office.shtml
ノール王妃公式サイト
http://www.noor.gov.jo/personal_profile.htm
●前国王逝去直前のゴタゴタが書かれた記事。
当時皇太子だったハッサン王子の妻、サルバス王女はパキスタンの外交官の娘。
(パキスタンの「名誉殺人」バッシングにはこれが理由としてあるのかも)
まだ国王が亡くなる前から、王宮の改装計画を立てていたことなどが、宮殿職員の匿名のリークによって
もたらされ、ハッサン王子の屈辱的な「皇太子」の地位後退に繋がる。
(やはり、いろいろ臭いますな)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/276136.stm
Tuesday, February 9, 1999 Published at 22:49 GMT
World: Middle East
Battle of the wives
妻たちの戦い
Two queens for Jordan: Queen Noor (left) and Princess Rania (right)
By Middle East Analyst Martin Asser
The accession of King Hussein's son, Abdullah II, may be secure, but a question mark still hangs over the hierarchy of the women in the ruling Hashemite dynasty of Jordan.
To date there is still only one queen, Noor, the late king's wife. She has been playing as prominent a public role as permitted her under the constraints on women imposed by Islamic funerary traditions.
Toni Gardiner: 1962 married, 1972 divorced, 1999 Queen Mother
But she is not the new king's mother. That position belongs to Princess Muna, born Antoinette (Toni) Gardiner, the colourful Englishwoman who divorced King Hussein in 1972. She is also holding court in the Jordanian capital and her prestige has been greatly enhanced by the accession of her son.
Then there is Princess Rania, King Abdullah's wife and mother of his four-year-old son, also - prophetically perhaps - called Hussein. Rania has not been given the title of Queen yet, but it is only a matter of time.
The Hashemite 'Dynasty'
If it all sounds like the starting-point for a Hollywood mini-series, there could certainly be some interesting plot lines in store for the future.
Princess Rania: The next generation
One might revolve around Queen Noor as the mother of Prince Hamzah. He was reputedly King Hussein's favourite son and the one whom the dead king wanted to succeeded him.
But Hamzah is only 18 and the king's death from cancer came too early and too suddenly for that wish to be realised. Hamzah is now is now crown prince and heir to the throne.
Another unpredictable role could be played by Princess Sarvath, though her character might already have been written out of the script.
She is the wife of ex-Crown Prince Hassan, King Hussein's brother whom he dismissed as next-in-line after more than 30 years service, just days before the king died.
Princess Sarvath, the cultured and intellectual daughter of a Pakistani diplomat, was therefore only days away from becoming queen herself.
In the rumour mill that is Amman, fuelled by off-the-record briefings by anonymous palace officials, a story was being circulated that Princess Sarvath had already drawn up plans for the redecoration of the royal apartment before King Hussein had even died.
In his open letter of 25 January, in which he humiliatingly deposed Crown Prince Hassan, King Hussein wrote about slander and backbiting directed at Queen Noor.
A new generation
That certainly fits in with the intrigue apparently at work in the Hashemite court, but who is slandering who is far from certain.
In the new Jordanian era under King Abdullah, it is Princess Rania whose star is on the rise.
She is of Palestinian origin. That might be a taboo subject in public discourse in Jordan, where most citizens come from Palestinian stock. But it assures her a place in the hearts of the majority of the population.
She has not shied away from controversy, tackling child abuse and the crushing poverty in some areas of Jordan. But that too could work in her favour for a new generation of Jordanians who are hungry for change in the traditional, tribally-dominated kingdom.
Most to lose
The one with most to lose is Queen Noor. She enjoyed power and influence as King Hussein's consort. A vestige of that will no doubt remain as Jordanians honour the memory of the late King Hussein.
Queen Noor: Seemingly as popular in Israel as she is in Jordan
But she has always seemed out-of-step with Jordanians, even though her father was an Arab. And that distance from the people was compounded in her apparent warmth for Israel and Israelis.
But as the dying king lay unconscious in hospital, the crowd outside gave Queen Noor a rousing reception as she appeared among them to share their grief. That could be a turning-point in her relationship with Jordanians.
Queen Noor's greatest loss would be if her son, Crown Prince Hamzah, is to share his Uncle Hassan's fate never to become king.
But that is another plot for an episode that will not be written for many years yet.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.adl.org/israel/queen_noor.asp
Queen Noor's Blind Spots
ノール王妃の盲点
A review of Leap of Faith: Memoirs of an Unexpected Life by Queen Noor (Miramax Books, March 2003)
Posted: May 12, 2003
By Kenneth Jacobson,
Associate National Director and Director of International Affairs,
Anti-Defamation League
Queen Noor of Jordan, the fourth wife of the late King Hussein, is beautiful, smart, American born and reared, pro-Palestinian and totally immersed in the anti-Israel myths of the Middle East. While her perspective on the Middle East is not without interest, the reader must approach with caution.
Because of King Hussein's role in helping to bring about a peace plan between Israel and the Palestinians, the reader expects the memories of a friend - not uncritical - but from the heart and hand of a friend. Instead, an interesting not very detailed personal history of Queen Noor's life with King Hussein unfolds against a backdrop in which Jordan is portrayed as key to whatever happens geo-politically in the region, though it is small and helpless, while Israel is portrayed as the gigantic neighborhood bully and Israel's supporters in the U.S. as political and media manipulators.
Throughout the memoir Queen Noor downplays her life of privilege before she became a queen. She notes that her father was deeply in debt while he was the head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). However, before he was with the FAA and certainly after, he apparently was able to provide a financially and socially rich milieu for his family. Lisa Halaby, as she was then known, went to elite private girls schools in Washington, D.C., New York and Massachusetts, had a horse which she rode regularly, made her debut while she was an undergraduate at Princeton, and lived a thoroughly upper class lifestyle. Her father's roles in government and aviation placed her at the center of an astonishing world of elites whose political, social and financial connections - especially in the Middle East - made her later incarnation as Queen of Jordan not only possible, but somewhat inevitable.
Her Arab heritage also played an enormous part in her transformation from Lisa Halaby to Queen Noor of Jordan. She states that "To my mother's long-standing frustration, I was most intrigued by my Arab roots・" She also reports that she read widely of the history and culture of the Arab world. Much of Queen Noor's understanding of the history of the region, however, places her squarely in the profoundly pro-Palestinian camp. She is extremely critical of Israel even to questioning its existence:
"Everyone I knew, including my new friends in Jordan expressed horror at the realities of the Holocaust. But they resented, as I was growing to, how Arabs were cast as the aggressors in the dispute between Israel and the Arab countries, when it was their land that had been seized to resolve a European political problem. Jews, Muslims, and Christians had lived peacefully in the Middle East and indeed in Palestine for centuries. It was not until the rise of Zionism and the creation of Israel that animosities took root."
The Queen does not find fault with other Arab nations, except when they target Jordan or King Hussein. In her skewed world view, Israel is always the aggressor; the Palestinians are always oppressed, except when King Hussein has to expel "Palestinian resistance fighters" from Jordan because they had attempted to take over the country. Noor relates "The thousands of captured Palestinian fighters being held in Jordanian camps by the army were also treated tolerantly."
She discusses the fact that Jordan did have to fight Syria and the PLO -- at the time to defend itself, and that Hussein told her it was the "gravest threat" in Jordan's "history." Noor has no concept of the irony involved when she assails Israel's right to self defense against the Palestinians. She also fails to point out that the terrorist cell calling itself Black September was so named because of the mass Palestinian expulsion from Jordan by the King in 1970 - in September -- although she does mention that King Hussein topped their hit list and that they were responsible for the Munich massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics.
While Queen Noor is not so insensitive or crass as to actually use the phrase "Jewish Lobby," (she does not shrink from "Zionist Lobby, however) or to speak of "Jewish control" of the media or finance, she does have a great deal to say about the power of Jews in the United States, particularly in Washington, DC and in media and entertainment - implying "Jewish control." She writes, for example,
"Confronting the power of the Zionist Lobby for the first time was sobering. The Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee was founded in Washington in 1980, the year of our state visit, in an effort to promote a more balanced U.S. Middle East policy and to correct anti-Arab Stereotypes. But it was a rank amateur compared to groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC's supporters were CEOs of large American corporations and representatives of the top levels of media and entertainment businesses, financial institutions, legal and medical professions, and, increasingly, the highest reaches of government. Their activism at the grassroots level was legendary. I remember hearing about a news program in the late 1980s that was planning a story critical of Israel during the intifada, the Palestinian uprising. Hundreds of telegrams poured into the studio protesting the anti-Israel 'bias' of the program two hours before it was even aired! I had first learned of this bias, in the years prior to my marriage, from American correspondents covering the region. They frequently complained about writing dispatches that they considered evenhanded only to find that their editors at home had rewritten them with a pro-Israel slant. Stories casting Arabs in a positive light were greeted with muted enthusiasm, they said."
The Queen has other blind spots and prejudices. While she calls the late Yitzhak Rabin a friend, and speaks of the sadness she and the King felt at his death, she also writes of the problems that she believed accumulated between Jordan and Israel afterward. She has few good words for Netanyahu, Sharon or even Ehud Barak. She mentions Barak only in relation to his role as the Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces and then negatively, and does not mention his role as Prime Minister at all. She has no wish to see the need for or understand Israel's self defense against terrorism. She snipes at Israel throughout the memoir.
The only sympathy she can muster is for the Palestinians and their cause, but only in relation to Israel; the Queen has no compassion to waste on the Palestinians and Yasir Arafat when Jordan has been the target. She sees no comparisons between Jordan's and Israel's need to defend against terror. While some of her criticism may be valid, it loses its soundness in the face of her obvious belief that the core problem is Israel's very existence.