投稿者 佐藤雅彦 日時 2001 年 10 月 22 日 13:57:20:
世界貿易センター「テロ」事件・デッチ上げのシナリオ
●今回の「９・１１米国事変」は、アフガニスタンへの軍事侵攻
を正当化するために周到に計画されたもので、そのデッチ上げ
のために用いられた芝居の仕掛けが「世界貿易センター」で
あった――という興味ぶかい推察を見つけましたので、紹介
しておきます。 これまでに出てきた色々な公式記録をつなぎ
合わせていくと、どうやら合理的な結論はこのあたりに落ち着く
ようで……。
■■■■@■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
WTC FRAME-UP PSY-OP CASE SOLVED
【世界貿易センターでっちあげ心理戦争「事変」の謎が解けた】
Here is how the WTC/Pentagon crashbombing operation came, about,with strong documentary evidence available supporting everystep of this scenario. I am willing to field all questions discussants can devise to test this solution.
=====================
Mossad and the CIA were dealing Afgan-opium-derived "China-white" heroin or at least were devoting effort to protect the supply sources of the multi-trillion-dollar money-laundered deposits backing the global investments of American and Britsih merchant banks. The Afgan Northern Alliance druglords grow 80 to 90 percent of the worlds opium, the prime ingredient of heroin, which is then moved over the small China-Afgan boarder for processing and distribution by the giant People's Liberation Army - Triad transnational corporation- drug cartel-and military instrument. Against this giant network the religious Taliban had been erradicating Afgan opium production, supressing production and profits for druglords, bankers and globalization capitalists alike.
Thus this became the initial motivation of a renegade group of CIA and/or Mossad having an interest in defeating Taliban. (Nothing absurd so far, right?)
Next, the Russian and Kazakh mafias have ties with U.S. executive James Giffen in Kazakhstan -- a man under investigation by a New York grand jury in the months before September 11 for illegal involvement in an oil swaps between Kazakhstan and sanctioned Iran (read the Aug. 9 New Yorker Magazine for a full account of this by Seymore Hershe -- I have already presented long excerpts of this in past posts) -- and all of the evidence for this crime was being kept on the 20th through 25th floor of one of the WTC towers where the FBI had its New York Offices. And James Giffen is the man anyone has to go through to get any oil agreement with Kazakhstan -- including any pipelines built that would traverse Afganistan. (There is $6 trillion dollars worth of oil and gas in Central Asia.) Giffen certainly understood -- if he did not originate the idea -- that if he couldcan get operatives (even "captured" vengeful Islamic activists whose rage could be shaped and directed to use of terror) to destroy the FBI offices in the WTC building and the documentation evidence it contained, then he would be escape grand jury indictment -- and, as an powerful added benefit, the (framed) Taliban would get replaced with a regime in Afganistan that would permit a pipeline to be built -- preferably a Northern Alliance druglord government that would harmonize with Giffen's own unethical (murderous) entrepreneural style. (See the New Yorker artlical for details of Giffen's history.)
(So far this super-crime scheme involves only a small group of people-- Russian Mafia and perhaps a Giffen - renegade CIA or a Giffen "dark-side" Mossad link. But other, even more powerful players may have had involvement -- certainly they stood to gain tremendously if the crashbomb frame-up were successfully accomplished. (Prior to September 11 charges had been brought against Alan Greenspan (forgive me -- in a previous post I said "Milton Friedman" instead of Greenspan -- Friedman is a great and honest and honorable academic scholar and Nobel Prize winner -- who, very superficially, looks like Greenspan) -- at any rate, Alan Greenspan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan & Co. and other powerful American financial figures and instiutions had charges brought against them -- reportedly a very well-documented case --over the fixing of gold prices -- with evidence for that case too stored by the FBI on the FBI floors of the WTC! These parties would not only profit heavily from the "carrot" of both oil and drug monies circulating through thier great financial instiutions, but they also would gain from avoding the "stick" of one of the most threatening lawsuits ever to confront the U.S. financial establishment (realize what a guilty verdict in this case would mean to these leading financial families and to the Establishment in general!) -- these parties would welcome predictable and certainly substantial benefits from the the destruction of the evidence in the WTC and of some of the witnesses and researchers on the case as well.)
Notice that so far we have powerful men with powerful incentives who characteristically operate in secret and under the protection of wealth, status and power -- both the carrot ($2 trillion in annual drug revenues funneled through the banking system -- which has funded much of the proceeds to fund the development of the Princeling-Triad dictatorship in China, btw, -- (The communist government has been in the opium business since the 1930's -- Mao pioneered the model later followed by Peru's Shining Path and Colombia's Maoist F.A.R.C. narco-terrorists. And Zhou Enlai devised the plan in the 1950's of weakening American society through a drug invasion.)
"China white" heroin distributed by the People's Liberation Army, made from Afgan opium links all banker and oilman to the corrupt and renegade the secret state agencies, CIA, FBI, and Mossad -- renegade agents of either agency may have seen this opportunity for mutual gain and found the way -- having profiles of each of the players -- to propose the crashbombing frame-up as the best "solution" to each of players most troublesome problems, while making enormous profits besides.
Note that the Bush's are tied to both the CIA and oil and, through Mena Arkansas drug smuggling and through the Iran-Contra drugs and arms deals etc. (drugworld investigator Daniel Hopsicker, as well as Noam Chomsky and many others have exposed this thoroughly -- at least in the broad strokes necessary to support this reconstruction of the crime.)
(The facts of the drug connections are known to everyone from the Russians, to the John Birchers, to Wired Magazine, Harpers, New Yorker, the Village Voice, the Nation, and Rolling Stone Magazine, all having explored the drug - Establishment connections in great detail.)
Which brings us to Ariel Sharon. His hard-head policy of retaliation regardless of collateral damage and his provocation at the mosque cost him dearly in world opinion. In fact the Bush administration was very close to making initiating a major policy shift -- obviously known to Sharon from the greatest intelligence organization in the world -- Bush was planning the the recognition/sponsorhip of a seperate Palestinian state. (Also war crime charges had been brought against Sharon in international court, further putting his hard-line policy against the Palestinians in unfavorable light.
Mindful of Ariel Sharon's self-made hard spot, it is entirely possible that the same CIA or Mossad mastermind that thought of the crashbombing frame-up plan in the first place decided to take the risk of telling Sharon about the plan, offering it as a solution to the trapped old "freedom fighter's" problems as well. If the U.S. could be made to think that the hated Osama bin Laden -- that Islamic fundametnalism itself -- is responsible for destroying twin towers of the WTC and the American government itself, then, Sharon would certainly grasp, American opinion woudl radically swing to an extremely hard line against all Moslem and Arab entities not securely under their thumb, and most particularly, from Sharon's viewpoint, against Palestinians.
No profile of Sharon gives any indication that he would not close on such a deal, such a serving of his higher good, his prime directive.
And that is all that was needed to carry off this operation.
The getting and conditioning/deceiving of hijackers is an easy affair. Mossad has infiltrated bin Ladin's forces in Central Asia and the Mideast -- but it is a radically decentralized organization (as it must be to
remain viable) and so it was an easy matter for this "dark-side" Mossad, with Sharon's clandestine approval, to trick some very angry and vengeful Arabs into thinking they were doing bin Ladens or some other anti-Zionist or anti-Globalization radicals to agree to hijack the four planes. Millions in the world hated the America and the globalization that the World Trade Center represents. These recruited hijackers need not have been Arabs -- there are Croats, Serbs, Latin Americans, and Iranians and any number of other victim-pool people who could have volunteered to conduct the hijacking -- possibly without fully understanding the end result of the mission -- they need not have "signed on" for a suicide bombing.
(Many aviation experts on the net are describing a system built into commercial airliners for taking over control of flight from the ground, a system developed to combat terrorism. It is possible that the course of the plane's flight was taken over by this system installed to thwart hijackers (detailed in several reports on the web.) But if the crashes were not effected in this way, psychological-control methods, wholly sufficient for the job, were also available. The technology of behavoir control is further advanced than the popular press has made people aware. Skilled psy op agents can get subjects angry enough and convinced enough of the justice and good effects of "acts' represented as serving their 'cause" to be willing to undertake even suicidal missions. (Activist Alan Yu has researched this technology as have other researchers from a broad spectrum of political orientation.)
And this is all that is needed to conduct the terror act.
But then what?
When the crashes take place -- word merely has to be put out by those involved (the CIA, Mossad, Sharon and those complicit in the Bush Administration, (based on his behavior, my money is on Paul Wolfowitz) to push the theme that bin Ladin was responsible and that this aggressive war to overthrow the Taliban is the only immediate appropriate reaction -- since, the spin goes, the Afgans are responsible for "harboring" bin Laden and that "harboring is exactly the same as terrorism" and that for that reason the entire Afgan government must be terminated (must be "ended as a state" to use Wolfowitz's revealing phrasing of September 12.)
The frame-up has all sorts of collateral benefits for the perpetrators. Now the perpetrators can tell the unsuspecting that bin Ladin's guilt has been established beyond doubt -- that for the sake of the security and safety of Israel and the United States that it is necessary that the impression of an "open and shut case" must be spun. (The news media is exhorted to be patriotic and exemplary "wartime correspondents" and sets about selling the blaming of bin Ladin and advocating war and overthrow in Afganistan -- because they have been deceitfully led to believe they really know who bombed the buildings; and among the elite of the news publishers, they "know" it is in the best interests of Israel and Wall Street that this be the response, that this be the spin.
And Mr. Bush and Mr. Blair each benefit enormously, politically.
And trillions of dollars are enough to subdue and supress criticism of the investigation -- after all, who would know better than the CIA and Mossad exactly who is responsible? (The fact has been reported -- in a different context, of course -- that the U.S. intelligence receives all of its ground intelligence from Central Asia through Mossad's network of infiltrator spies -- in other words, whatever "proofs" the U.S. has (and has shown Tony Blair and NATO) has come exclusively through Sharon via Mossad. The "evidence" so-called, thus, is no counterweight to this reconstruction of the crime. The "evidence" comes exclusively from the prime "frame-up" suspect.
Has Mossad done this kind of thing before? Remember the USS Liberty, an American ship with flag flying, deliberatly attacked and sunk (in multiple attack waves) with efforts to kill every saior abord -- either to destroy information that the ship may have intercepted or to frame Arab states to gain the support of American public opinion. (There are other cases involving the blowing up of a disco dance nightclub, again to frame targeted enemies -- a case actually brought to light by the non-renegade "good side" Mossad.
The coverup apparently has unlimited resources. Two Mossad men caught red handed days after the WTC crashbombings, were carryhing explosive charges and detonation controls in the government chambers of the Mexican legislature? Apparently big bribes have been, because these men have been set free.
One surmises that appeals are made to the bodey man of a "destabalizing international crisis" is the truth were to get out. This is ancient cloak of deviant ruling elites.
How many readers -- even if they strongly suspect that this reconstruction fits the facts -- would not deny the conclusion anyway because of fear of what this fact would do to Israel's reputation and thus to her security and survival?
Yet this view may be wrong. If Israeli's on the "good side" were to arrest Sharon and chase down the renegades of the Mossad "dark side" and bring them to justice -- tensions in the Mideast would dissolve, and good-faith restored -- good faith that will never return to the world as long as the greatest terror frame-up in history is not corrected by justice and the truth.
Also, if this reconstruction is valid, then that certainly raises the liklihood that Ariel Sharon was also the man who gave the order for the murder of Yhitzak Rabin. Israel's greatest peacmaker (if that title does not go to Began for his treaty with Sadat.)
Conviction of Sharon would mean that the warmongering "take-no-prisoners" school of Zionism would at last be discredited and that the humanitarian way of Rabin could again be given another chance -- with the Palestinians gaining restored faith in Israel to be fair and just after seeing Sharon removed and brought to justice.
I know that at this point you are poised to throw the usual tomatoes and call me a "loon" and a "nazi" -- but I know that those who call me those names are themselves fearful that this analysis may be right.. (And I forgive you in advance for having to through those tomatoes out of loyalty and not knowing what else to do in your uncertainty.)
It is a rotten world all around -- but my advice is to seek the truth wherever it leads and then to enforce justice -- justice against the real authors of the Sept 11 terror, whoever they may be -- to go after Sharon just as strenuously as you were recently ready to hunt down bin Laden.
And of course, the United States has a similar house cleaning of its topmost shelves of power and influence -- a job that we have been putting off since the 1870's. (How the entire world will benefit from that job!)
(And I should make this clearer: The media are not silent because they are conmplicit in the terror -- they are silent because they are "yes men" who "know where their bread is buttered" and they are not about to jump up and say "Sharon did it" until they see others in their postions doing so. This is consitent with today's "Dilbert" world of Establishment-monopolized organizations. Only an earth shaking event, like the exposing of the Establishment's role in the WTC terror, will shake down this system.)
Now, let's discuss this intelligently.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
================
HEARING ON U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS 1998
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=10389
Afghanistan War Planned Months Before 911 Suicide Air Attack
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=10390
ZHIRINOVSKY PREDICTS U.S. WILL DISINTEGRATE IN 10-15 YEARS
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=10394
PUBLIC ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT INFO CURTAILED
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=10309
Government Had Prior Knowledge - Pending 9-11 Attack
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knowledge.htm
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。