投稿者 佐藤雅彦 日時 2001 年 10 月 14 日 17:29:28:
●９・１１米国事変の下手人は「アルカイダ」、
世界貿易センタービルが倒れた原因は「圧壊だ」、
そして事件は奇々カイカイだ……というのが“定説”デス。（藁
たしかに、事変の直後から、ビルの崩壊の理由は「異常高温による
圧壊」というシナリオがマスコミ宣伝されてきました。
事件の真相は“ヤブの中”です。
英語に直訳すると「イン・ザ・ブッシュ」
いやいや、「イン・ザ・小ブッシュ」ですが。
……しかし、あのビルの崩壊については、やはり“発破”説を否定
しえない“証拠”が出てきています。（だからといって“発破”説だと
断定もしえないですけどね。）
以下は、救急隊員の録音記録についての指摘です。
もっとも、ことなかで言及している「爆発」は、ジェット機の火災
に由来するものだったかも知れませんけど……。
さらに、事変直後のアルバカーキ・ジャーナルに載った
２本の興味ぶかい記事を紹介しておきましょう。
事変当初にニューメキシコ州の“発破”の専門家ロメロ氏が
このビル崩壊を「爆弾のしわざ」だとコメントしていたのに、
１０日後には「爆弾の仕業という可能性も否定できないが
熱圧壊のせいだった可能性が高い」と言い出しました。
この記事は、その“発破”専門家の変節ぶりを描き出しています。
“軽率な陰謀説”を口にした、と反省して宗旨替えしたのかも
しれませんが、ひょっとすると、事変の陰謀性をズバリと指摘
してしまったために、どこぞから何かを言われたのかも知れませんね。
■■■■@■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Path:
mindspring!news.mindspring.net!finch!logbridge.uoregon.edu!howland.erols.net
!portc.blue.aol.com.MISMATCH!portc03.blue.aol.com!audrey04.news.aol.com!not-
for-mail
Lines: 50
X-Admin: news@aol.com
From: wittgens2001@省略 (Wittgens2001)
Date: 14 Oct 2001 02:44:35 GMT
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: WTC Secondary Explosions
Message-ID: <20011013224435.09263.00001816@省略>
In fairness to the people that have posted about secondary
explosions at the WTC, the recorded emergency dispatch
conversations also contain several references to explosions
(see below).
【貿易センタービルの二度目の爆発では、救急隊員の通話
のなかに、この爆発に関するいくつかの言及も録音されている】
Also, in the MSNBC special with the footage of the second
(North Tower) collapse taken by Dr. Mark Heath, several
sequential muffled explosions can be heard.
【さらに、MSNBCスペシャル報道では、マーク・ヒース医師によって
撮影された“二番目に崩落したビル”（＝貿易センタービルの北棟）
の崩落の様子が収められているが、そのなかに連続した鈍い音の
爆発音も収録されている。】
In particular, accompanying the first muffled explosion you hear
in that footage is a clearly visible burst of smoke that emanates
laterally from perhaps twenty or so floors below where the top
of the building is beginning to collapse.
【とりわけ注目すべきは、この録画に収められていた一連の
鈍い爆発音のうちの最初のもので、この 爆発音と共に、ビルの
横から爆発の煙が噴出しており、崩壊はその20階ほど上の
ビル頂上から始まっているのだ。】
In terms of the south tower however, a picture taken at the time
of the collapse:
【最初に「崩落」した南側タワーについては、その様子を次の
サイトで見ることが出来るが――
http://www.dispatch.com/news/news01/sep01/wtccrash1.php
appears to show the top portion of the building keeling over as
would be expected from where the gash of the plane impact was.
目視したかぎりでは、ビルは頂上から崩れ落ちていて、これは
航空機衝突で出来た深い裂け目が「崩落」の原因になったと理解
しやすい。】
From http://www.ny1.com :
http://real.ny1.com:8080/ramgen/real/PCwtcscannerlo.rm
The recording begins shortly before 10 a.m., a little more than an
hour after the first plane struck the north tower, and approximately
55 minutes after the second plane struck the south tower .
【録音は午前１０時ちょっと前に始まっている。最初の航空機が
北側タワーに突っ込んでから１時間を多少回った頃、二番目の
航空機が南側タワーに突っ込んでから５５分後である。】
3:29【訳注：録音から３分２９秒後、と思われる】
tower 2 has (had?) a major explosion and what appears to be a complete
collapse
【訳注：タワー２は、９時５０分に「崩落」した南棟を指していると思われる】
8:26
I was involved in the secondary explosion at tower 1
【訳注：北棟で２度目の爆発】
14:15
Be advised that (unintelligible) explosion
15:47
I'm trying to raise the officer from the explosion that was (unintelligible)
18:24
Where are you guys? We're down right by the explosion, we're down here
21:03
...Warren st. because of the secondary explosion, we've got numerous people
covered with dust from the secondary explosion
23:26
We've got (had?) another explosion on the tower
【訳注：北棟で新たな爆発】
26:55
...definitely(?) a secondary explosion (K?)
■■■■@■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
参考 ９・１１事変の推移
９月１１日・午前８時４５分（現地時間）
◆世界貿易センタービル（WTC）の北棟に
アメリカン航空11便が激突。
９時０３分
◇WTC南棟にユナイテッド航空175便が激突。
９時４５分
ワシントン郊外のペンタゴン（国防総省ビル）に
アメリカン航空77便が激突。
９時５０分 ◇WTC南棟が「崩落」。
１０時１０分 ユナイテッド航空93便が
ピッツバーグ郊外に墜落。
１０時２９分 ◆WTC北棟が「崩落」。
１３時００分 ワシントンに非常事態宣言。
２０時３０分 小ブッシュ大統領が国民向け演説。
「何千という命が邪悪なテロ行為によって犠牲に
なった」云々……。
翌１２日 小ブッシュ大統領が「これは戦争だ」と
軍事的報復の姿勢をアッピールした。
■■■■@■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
【参考】 ニューメキシコ州探鉱技術研究所のバン・ロメロ氏は
事変の当初は「WTC崩落は爆弾を仕掛けなきゃ無理」とコメント
していたが、10日後には「熱圧壊」説でも説明が付く、と自説を
曲げた。 以下はその“変節ぶり”を示した２本の新聞記事
Albuquerque Journal
http://www.abqjournal.com/aqvan09-11-01.htm
September 21, 2001
Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says
By John Fleck
Journal Staff Writer
A New Mexico explosives expert says he now believes there were no explosives in the World Trade Center towers, contrary to comments he made the day of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.
"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail," said Van Romero, a vice president at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
The day of the attack, Romero told the Journal the towers' collapse, as seen in news videotapes, looked as though it had been triggered by carefully placed explosives.
Subsequent conversations with structural engineers and more detailed looks at the tape have led Romero to a different conclusion.
Romero supports other experts, who have said the intense heat of the jet fuel fires weakened the skyscrapers' steel structural beams to the point that they gave way under the weight of the floors above.
That set off a chain reaction, as upper floors pancaked onto lower ones.
Romero said he believes still it is possible that the final collapse of each building was triggered by a sudden pressure pulse caused when the fire reached an electrical transformer or other source of combustion within the building.
But he said he now believes explosives would not have been needed to create the collapse seen in video images.
Conspiracy theorists have seized on Romero's comments as evidence for their argument that someone else, possibly the U.S. government, was behind the attack on the Trade Center.
Romero said he has been bombarded with electronic mail from the conspiracy theorists.
"I'm very upset about that," he said. "I'm not trying to say anything did or didn't happen."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
●以下が、事変当初のロメロ氏のコメント
BELOW IS THE ORIGINAL STORY AS IT APPEARED ON SEPT. 11, 2001 hours after the attack
September 11, 2001
Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says
By Olivier Uyttebrouck
Journal Staff Writer
Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday.
The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.
Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.
Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts.
Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures.
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said in a phone interview from Washington, D.C.
Romero said he and another Tech administrator were on a Washington-area subway when an airplane struck the Pentagon.
He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance, were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss defense-funded research programs at Tech.
If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, the detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive, he said.
"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero said. The explosives likely would have been put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said.
The detonation of bombs within the towers is consistent with a common terrorist strategy, Romero said.
"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," Romero said.
Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary explosion that attracts emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion, he said.
Romero said that if his scenario is correct, the diversionary attack would have been the collision of the planes into the towers.
Tech President Dan Lopez said Tuesday that Tech had not been asked to take part in the investigation into the attacks. Tech often assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。