現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争２２ > 304.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争２２ > 304.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
議会のいわゆるクエスチョンタイムで，それを言明．その戦いはいつ止めるのかとの質問に、安全保障上の脅威が適切完全に亡くなるまで，とも言明した。
つまり米英の背後権力は、米大統領の年頭教書のとおりイラク，北朝鮮，イランをすべて破壊と乗っ取りを完成する決意を持っていることを、彼の言説からハッキリと確認できるのである。つまり，これは，総計30年ほどは続く戦争なのだ。特に，イランは，非常に強い国で最も手こずる。
米英は北朝鮮をターゲットにしている事は間違いないので、北朝鮮は破れかぶれで，最終局面で日本を巻き込み的に攻撃する可能性がある。金正日は米国が採用しているのだからの理由で、先制攻撃論を持ち出す可能性がある。日本は軍事的には防衛不可能なので、外交で事態を克服することに全力をあげるほかない。米英の狂気の行動におつきあいすればするほど，我が身に帰ることになる。米英にイラク戦争を開始させない外交に日本の運命をすべてかけるぐらいの気迫で全力で当たり、この潮流を逆流させる必要がある。もういちどいう。イージス艦を出して，米英側につけば、イラク戦争に向かう，米英は北朝鮮を武力制圧に出る．その際，日本は金から破れかぶれの反撃に出会う。最悪なケースは心臓部東京が破壊される。皇居なども当然一発だろう。
それでいいのですか？
小泉自民党絶対倒せ。
Blair: North Korea is next
Staff and agencies
Wednesday January 29 2003
The Guardian
Tony Blair today pledged that after dealing with Iraq, the UN would confront North Korea about its nuclear weapons programme.
The prime minister was giving an impassioned defence of the government's position on Iraq during his weekly question time when an anti-war MP shouted: "Who's next?"
Replying to the heckle, Mr Blair said: "After we deal with Iraq we do, yes, through the UN, have to confront North Korea about its weapons programme".
"We have to confront those companies and individuals trading in weapons of mass destruction," he added.
To another cry of "When do we stop?", Mr Blair answered: "We stop when the threat to our security is properly and fully dealt with."
The British and US governments have been accused of double standards over their treatment of Iraq and North Korea - threatening Saddam Hussein's regime with war, when there is no evidence that it has successfully developed nuclear weapons, while attempting diplomacy with Kim Jong Il's, which is known to possess them.
Both countries were branded a part of Gaorge Bush's "axis of evil", alongside Iran. And Labour backbencher Lynne Jones suggested that it was that speech by the Mr Bush, rather than a significant change in circumstances, that had led to Iraq being identified as a "threat".
Why, she asked, had President Saddam not used his weapons of mass destruction during the first Gulf war, and why had he not been considered a threat when Labour first came to power?
Mr Blair replied: "one thing we can be quite sure of is that his reason for not using his chemical, biological and nuclear weapons was not out of the goodness of his heart."
"Precisely because he was a threat," he continued, "there have been thousands of British forces down in the Gulf the whole time flying over the no-fly zones."
"Precisely because he was a threat, we have had to impose a sanctions regime on Iraq that, because of the way Saddam implements it means, I'm afraid, misery and poverty for many many millions of Iraqis."
"At the very first meeting I had with President Bush back in February 2001 I said that weapons of mass destruction is an issue and we have to confront them," he claimed.
And Mr Blair concluded that the events of September 11 had made issues of weapons of mass destruction "even more important to deal with".
Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。