| Tweet |
(回答先: 今日「クライメート・ゲイト」、明日は「９１１ゲイト」！かな？ 投稿者 バルセロナより愛を込めて 日時 2009 年 12 月 04 日 19:46:47)
NISTから調査グループへの回答（2007年9月）
以下はいささか旧聞二属するので既出かもしれない。２００７年に９１１調査グループがＮＩＳＴに質問状を出したようである。それに対するＮＩＳＴからの回答が５ヵ月後に届いた（下記のＰＤＦ文書）。
http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf
On April 11th, 2007, family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice filed a petition with NIST demanding that it correct its erroneous methods and findings.
その最初のパラグラフが以下である。興味深い事は、ＮＩＳＴは、この末尾で
As we mentioned previously, we are unable to provide a full explanation- of the total collapse.
と告白していることである。
On September 27th, NIST finally replied.
引用開始：
The final section of your request asserts that the WTC Report's stated goal and overal analysis violates the Data Quality Act and OMB/NIST Information Quality Standards. The basis given for this assertion is that NIST did not fulfill its responsibilities under the NCST Act because the focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. The NCST Act, as you note in your letter, requires NIST to "establish the likely technical cause or causes of the building failure." In the case of the WTC Towers, NIST has established that the failures initiated in the floors affected by the aircraft impact damage and the ensuing fires resulted in the collapse of the towers. This conclusion is supported by a large body of visual evidence collected by NIST. Your letter suggests that NIST should have used computer models to analyze the collapse of the towers. NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability. At this point, because of the magnitude of the deflections and the number of failures occuring, the computer models are not able to converge on a solution.
Your letter contends that NIST's report violates the Information Quality Standard of "utility." NIST believes that the report has utility. In fact, the codes and standards bodies are already taking actions to improve building and fire codes and standards based on the findings of the WTC Investigation. As we mentioned previously, we are unable to provide a full explanation- of the total collapse.
引用終わり；
以上は最後のセクションの末尾のパラグラフであるが、この後の五番目のパラグラフの末尾に以下のような表現がある：
NIST did not test for the presence of explosive residue and such tests would notnecessarily have been conclusive. Therefore your requests for corrections are denied.
これに続くパラグラフの末尾で再度、次のように書いている：
Finally, NIST has stated that it found no corroborating evidence to suggest that explosives were used to bring down the buildings. Nisy did nor conduct tests for explosive residue and as noted above, such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive. Therefore, your requests for corrections are denied.
＝＝＝＝＝
私のコメント：上に書くＮＩＳＴの言は真実ではない。この年、爆破崩壊の可能性の検証をどこぞの調査機関に発注している。しかし、その正規の報告書が未だに公になっていないので、ＮＩＳＴが上記に書く事の半分は本当のようだ。
参考：
WTC7の爆破可能性調査をＮＩＳＴが始めたとのこと（ＮＩＳＴ ＨＰより）
http://www.asyura2.com/07/war93/msg/150.html
投稿者 凡人 日時 2007 年 6 月 07 日 16:51:10: pV3QNylzAqCv6
Re: ９．１１：私の投稿に対する非常に有益ないくつかのコメント
http://www.asyura2.com/09/warb1/msg/491.html
投稿者 脳天気な醜男 日時 2009 年 11 月 04 日 09:22:33: vkZAEFfow.6XY
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。