| Tweet |
911Blogger.comに出た記事ですが、
Mike Ruppert on Nanothermite
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19901
which originates from
http://mikeruppert.blogspot.com/
先に発表されたニルス･ハリト博士やスティーヴン･ジョーンズ博士らの論文発表の
ことを書いたBusinessmanというハンドルの人に対して、自分のブログの共同執筆者
ジェナ・オーキンともども、制御解体などではない。今後そういう話は一切お断りと
いう調子で書いています。
ずっと前から「彼は（権力側の)スパイだ」と主張する仲間がいるのですが、
どうやら彼が正しかったのかも！？です。
ロス警察の刑事だったときに、弾丸2発食らっていた人間の死亡原因を「自殺だ」と
いって疑わなかった男ですし。長年、しっかりTrutherだったKilltownすら
いつの間にかNo planer（WTCに飛行機はなかった）派の中核になっているのですから
誰がいつどうひっくり返るのかわからないという気がします。
サーマイトという証拠がもしあったとしても、誰がそれを仕掛けたかの証拠には
ならないという点は正しいですが、ジェナが引用している「否定派」の主張には
本当に無理があるし（WTC7はああして倒れて当然、みたいな）。
該当部分、英語のままですが以下にコピペします。
Jenna Orkin said...
businessman, where would we be without you? but here's another nail in the coffin of the nanothermite argument from a reader who goes by the monicker "m":
from M:
the journal that this alleged scientific report (tons of nanothermite) was published in is a newsletter based in UAE. There might be some politics interfering with objectivity here. A bag of dust from a 9/11 truther that supposedly was in her NYC apartment provided years after the event is not "chain of custody."
Nanothermite seems about as real as the "hologram" claim that used to infest the suburbs of the "truth" movement some years ago.
All three towers - even WTC 7 - were observed leaning and bulging before they fell down. And no demolition theories seem particularly interested in the structural impact of large planes flying full speed into the towers or the parts of the towers that fell on WTC 7 (first time that has ever happened).
I'm waiting for the "no buildings" theories.
7:08 PM
Comment from Rupert himself:
MCR said...
BUSINESSMAN -- You've been so valuable but what you're doing now is a major distraction that cannot contibute to what's most important for all of us.
The building demolition crap will not be injected into my list -- ever. From a legal standpoint nothing of what your posts are about is legally admissible evidence and proves nothing. Even if thermite were used, this so-called evidence (which wouldn't be considered by any court) does nothing to prove who put it there does it?
This is a distraction I won't permit. Your intelligence and loyatly and friendship are valued here. But the timing of this is highly suspect to me. If Jenna doesn't stop posting this thread I will.
I learned a long time ago that if COINTELPRO isn't nipped in the bud early it gets real "expensive" later on.
Go back and read FTW and what I wrote about physical evidence for the last eight years. Did you read Rubicon?
That's the last 9/11 physical evidence post I'll alow here. There are many other places more suitable for that. This is a blog that does things.
MCR
9:14 PM
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。