| Tweet |
(回答先: 「多額の電話使用明細」って、 投稿者 千早＠オーストラリア 日時 2008 年 2 月 22 日 09:10:32)
数年前にここで読んだのでした。
オーストラリアの独立系ジャーナリストで、一部からはスパイと呼ばれている
ジョー・ヴァイオールズの記事でした。
Regardless of the real reason or reasons for its publication, the story seems to have matured a lot since the first decoy news release by CNN early on September 12, 2001. Here we have considerably more detail, some of which is frankly impossible. In the alleged words of US Solicitor General Theodore Olson:
“She [Barbara] had trouble getting through, because she wasn’t using her cell phone – she was using the phone in the passengers’ seats,” said Mr Olson. “I guess she didn’t have her purse, because she was calling collect, and she was trying to get through to the Department of Justice, which is never very easy.” … “She wanted to know ‘What can I tell the pilot? What can I do? How can I stop this?’ ”
"What Can I tell the pilot?" Yes indeed! The forged Barbara Olson telephone call claims that the flight deck crew were with her at the back of the aircraft, presumably politely ushered down there by the box cutter-wielding Muslim maniacs, who for some bizarre reason decided not to cut their throats on the flight deck. Have you ever heard anything quite so ridiculous?
But it is at this juncture that we finally have the terminal error. Though the American Airlines Boeing 757 is fitted with individual telephones at each seat position, they are not of the variety where you can simply pick up the handset and ask for an operator. On many aircraft you can talk from one seat to another in the aircraft free of charge, but if you wish to access the outside world you must first swipe your credit card through the telephone. By Ted Olson’s own admission, Barbara did not have a credit card with her.
It gets worse. On American Airlines there is a telephone "setup" charge of US$2.50 which can only be paid by credit card, then a US$2.50 (sometimes US$5.00) charge per minute of speech thereafter. The setup charge is the crucial element. Without paying it in advance by swiping your credit card you cannot access the external telephone network. Under these circumstances the passengers’ seat phone on a Boeing 757 is a much use as a plastic toy.
Perhaps Ted Olson made a mistake and Barbara managed to borrow a credit card from a fellow passenger? Not a chance. If Barbara had done so, once swiped through the phone, the credit card would have enabled her to call whoever she wanted to for as long as she liked, negating any requirement to call collect.
Sadly perhaps, the Olson telephone call claim is proved untrue. Any American official wishing to challenge this has only to subpoena the telephone company and Justice Department records. There will be no charge originating from American Airlines 77 to the US Solicitor General.
中略、そして最後に
Addressing the Supreme Court of the United States of America, US Solicitor General Theodore Olson said it is "easy to imagine an infinite number of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately have reasons to give false information out."
以上、
Mother of All Lies About 9/11
Barbara Olson's "Phone Call" From Flight 77
Copyright Joe Vialls, 27 March 2002
http://www.vialls.com/lies911/lies.htm より。
確認要ですが、やはり「受話器をとって、あるボタンを押せばオペレーターと話せる」
感じではないですね。まして電話が設置されていなかったのなら、もうお話にも何にもなりません。
この記事には「妻バーバラからの電話」に関するテッド・オルソンの話が事件直後から
出てはいるものの、「最愛の妻を失った悲しみ」というような個人的談話が欠如している
ことが指摘されていますが、何かと言えば「妻や家族に感謝」みたいな賛辞を添える
アメリカ人にしては不自然と言えましょう。
権力に屈しない探偵でもいたら、彼らの夫婦仲がどんなだったかを調査させるとおもしろいかも
と、これを最初に読んだときも思ったものです。
千早＠嘘は必ずバレる。
- 機内電話についてのモーガンの説明 バルセロナより愛を込めて 2008/2/23 00:36:02
(0)
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。