| Tweet |
(回答先: 【米ミシガン州】イラク侵略戦争からの復員米兵が３歳幼女を強姦暴行、致命傷を負わせて起訴された 投稿者 passenger 日時 2008 年 2 月 20 日 18:08:24)
1994年3月31日にビル・クリントンが署名した法案で、GOALS 2000 というのが
あるそうです。詳しく調べていませんが、色々連邦政府からの注文に応えれば
（州立などの）学校に資金援助を出すというものだったろうと推察します。
その一環として、ペンシルヴァニアのJ.T.ランバート小学校で6年生の女子生徒たちに
下着を脱がさせ、膣内に医療器具を入れて何かの検査をしたと！！
しかも、数名の女生徒が抵抗し、一人は頑強に「母に電話をしてほしい。母は
私にこんなことをするのを欲しないはずだから」と講義したにもかかわらず、
その願いは完全に無視され、鍵までかけられて無理やりやられたと。
学校側に言わせると、事前にこうした検査をするという通知は出してあったと
ありますが、一人の親は「娘にその検査はさせないでくれ」という返事も出した。
にもかかわらず、彼らはその意向も無視して強行したそうです。
まだちゃんと調べていませんが、これは"Who controls the(our) Children"
というビデオなどで学校教育に関わる問題を訴えているアメリカ女性の主張と
関連したものがあると思っています。
ADHDや死亡の原因と言われる各種予防接種同様（これは健康関連の板ですね）
子供たちへの攻撃も相当前からドンドン進められている模様です。
当該記事、英語ですが途中までコピペしておきます。
千早
ELEVEN YEAR OLD 6TH GRADERS VIOLATED BY GOALS 2000 -- LITERALLY!
Government authorizes vaginal entry of schoolchildren
Protests of parents, screams of children, ignored by officials
This story has been edited from the original as written by Mark E.
Howerter, otherside@misslink.net. For further information, see the
Washington Times, May 6, 1996.
Parents no longer have to worry ``only'' about sex crazed men in
trench coats when it comes to the sexual abuse of their daughters.
Now, as one parent put it, ``Rapists and molestors sometimes wear
white, too, and don't always operate in the shadows.'' Such was the
case this last March 19th (1996) at the J. T. Lambert Elementary
School in East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
Fifty nine sixth grade girls were instructed to strip to their
underwear and wait for a genital examination that was part of a state
mandated physical. Sixteen of the girls started to cry and some asked
to call their parents. The school nurse called them ``babies'' and
refused to let them call home.
One 11 year old, Susie Tucker, wouldn't take no for an answer. ``I
want to call my mother. My mother wouldn't want you to do this to
me,'' she said. Her pleas fell on deaf ears. One nurse was reported to
have blocked the door so that none of the girls could escape.
The physician reportedly put the girls in a room and had them lie down
on a table, spread-eagled, with nothing covering them. Susie Tucker's
mother, Katie, said, ``The girls had no idea what they were doing. The
doctor didn't talk to them. She just did the genital exam and didn't
say one word. All my daughter could do was stare up at the ceiling.
And it hurt. It still hurts.''
In a fax I received from the East Stroudsburg Area School District
they claim that all parents were notified. Some of the parents admit
that they were notified of the physical but there was absolutely no
mention of any type of genital exam. According to The Rutherford
Institute in a press release dated May 10th, ``One girl's parents even
sent the permission slip back to the school denying it permission to
examine their child -- but the school examined her anyway.''
The problem here is that the ``default setting'' allows for this type
of procedure to be done if a parent does not disallow it in writing.
(In this case the East Stroudsburg school went ahead and performed the
exam on one student whose mother had specifically stated in writing
she did not want her daughter subjected to it.) The way it should be
done is that unless a note is specifically received back, signed by a
parent allowing the procedure it should not be done. It is just
backwards. The policy of the NEA under Goals 2000 is: if in doubt,
proceed.
The Rutherford Institute filed suit against the East Stroudsburg,
Pennsylvania, school district on May 10th on behalf of one family.
They say that additional families are expected to join the suit later
this month. ``The school's actions were outrageous,'' said David
Melton, a Rutherford Institute staff attorney who is co-counsel in the
case. ``The school acted with total disregard for either the students'
or the parents' rights.''
Read more at http://www.injusticeline.com/strouds.html
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。