| Tweet |
ケンブリッジ大学のキース・ セフェン博士が公式発表のWTC崩壊理論を崩壊に伴う抵抗及び熱伝導の不合理性などを指摘し物理学を無視した暴挙だとしてこき下ろす。
さらに博士は、ケンブリッジ大学や学会が公式発表のWTC崩壊理論を支持するのなら物理学のインチキを曝け出しているのに等しいとまで言い切り公式発表のWTC崩壊理論はこうして完全に崩壊した。
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/010408_debunked.htm
Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked
Mick Meaney
RINF
Monday, February 4, 2008
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/010408_debunked.htm
In late 2007 a British academic, Dr. Keith Seffen of the University of Cambridge, published a new mathematical analysis of the collapse of the World Trade Centre – however the paper contains several ridiculous claims. Now a formal request has been made by Mr J A Blacker MSc IMI, who recently debunked the paper, to Dr. Chris Burgoyne, the Head of the Department of Engineering at Cambridge University, highlighting these errors and appealing for the misleading paper to be corrected.
The request points out that Dr Seffen’s paper defies several key laws of physics, i.e. conservation of momentum and conservation of energy.
Mr Blacker’s request also states:
“All the floors offered the same flimsy resistance, when in fact each had different construction characteristics, is beyond any logic as the lower floor core columns were over double the thickness compared to the upper floors.”
Such glaring errors should be an embarrassment to one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious universities.
Dr Seffen’s paper essentially claims that a falling body can fall through the path of most resistance. Such a claim is ludicrous and defies all logic or honest scientific integrity.
Another inaccuracy in the paper is the fact it does not take into account the energy needed to convert the 300,000 tons of concrete and steel to dust.
“The Seffen analysis is based on the columns being a hollow box construction. What about cross bracing?” states Mr Blacker.
“The Seffen paper claims that burning jet fuel in air can weaken ALL the steel girders evenly (hence symmetrical collapse due to gravity of all columns perfectly), yet both ends of these outer and inner massive columns were outside the fire zone to differing degrees hence heat would have conducted up and down very efficiently at different rates, and many columns were not even subjected to any significant fire. Are we really expected to believe that fire can weaken steel evenly despite the core columns conducting heat efficiently at varying rates away from varied regions of temperature?”
Simply put, for the University of Cambridge to continue supporting this absurd theory is to present a fictional view of physics.
Download the request here in PDF format.
Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/cambridge-university-twin-towers-theory-debunked/2353/
さあ皆さん日本中に広めてください。
阿修羅新聞
- あわてないで！ 公式説を否定しているのはSeffen教授ではなくBlacker氏です！ バルセロナより愛を込めて 2008/2/06 17:00:53
(1)
- Re:大ヘマをやらかしてしまいました！補足フォローありがとうござます とかげのおっさん 2008/2/06 18:46:05
(0)
- Re:大ヘマをやらかしてしまいました！補足フォローありがとうござます とかげのおっさん 2008/2/06 18:46:05
(0)
- Re:公式発表のWTC崩壊理論を糾弾 とかげのおっさん 2008/2/06 11:52:54
(0)
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。