| Tweet |
(回答先: The US Government’s Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic（英語でごめん） 投稿者 忍 日時 2007 年 10 月 14 日 18:46:45)
Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
On the 11th September 2001 at 09:59 and 10:28 EDT, two enormous explosions pulverised the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre in New York. The 400 metre high towers disintegrated in a volcanic eruption of dust and rubble while the entire world watched in Shock and Awe on live television.
The buildings were "smulched into a smouldering pit" where the temperature remained so high that soil and glass were vaporised - boiled away - for over 6 weeks.
Numerous accounts of the discovery of molten steel weeks later, along with video proof, give further witness to this phenomenon.
Never before in the history of modern construction has a steel framed building collapsed due to fire.
In the aftermath of the collapse, a team of scientists from the US Geological Survey collected samples of dust from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan where it had come to rest from the enormous pyroclastic dust cloud that enveloped the city.
In the dust, they found high levels of chemical elements that had no business being there.
Extremely rare and toxic elements.
Some of them elements that only exist in Radioactive Form.
Elements such as Strontium, Barium, Thorium, Cerium, Lanthanum and Yttrium.
The concentrations of these rare elements in the dust samples were related to each other by significant mathematical relationships.
Although these elements discovered in high quantities are very rare in the general environment, one well known situation occurs in which they are very common. In fact, the elements discovered form a distinctive signature and hallmark of a certain well known chemical process.
Strontium, Barium, Thorium, Cerium, Lanthanum, Yttrium and other elements discovered in the dust are characteristic fission products of Uranium. Even some Uranium was present in significant amounts. The presence of all of these elements together in mathematically related quantities can only be explained by Nuclear Fission.
The evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible that the Twin Towers were subjected to far more than just a conventional Controlled Demolition. They were each pulverised to dust by a Nuclear Explosion.
But even more than that, the vast quantity of fallout produced and other factors shows that the explosions were not produced by ordinary atomic bombs.
The explosions were produced by a clandestine Nuclear Reactor under each tower undergoing a "power excursion" and then a core meltdown.
It is not believable that this could have occurred by accident. The reactors would have been located well below the 27 metre deep B6 basement level that was officially the bottom of the WTC construction. The reactor cores were probably 80 metres below ground. The aircraft impacted the towers high above, more than 300 metres above ground level. It is inconceivable that the aircraft crashes could have affected the reactors buried deep beneath the ground.
Who built these clandestine reactors? For what purpose? Who co-ordinated their deliberate core meltdown with the aircraft crashes?
Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
This 166 page report with 66 figures, graphs and photographs presents the detailed evidence for the Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre. It is written in as non-technical a way as possible for a wide audience, including explaining the chemistry of nuclear fission.
While many people have shown that the towers were subjected to a controlled demolition, this is the first public document to present the evidence and proof that they were in fact subjected to a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. No data on the fallout from a nuclear explosion has ever been available to the public before. This document presents the USGS data along with comprehensive analysis.
While others have suspected that the towers may have been subjected to nuclear explosions - because of the seismographic data, the hot spots and the vast amount of energy expended in the explosions, the incontrovertible proof comes from the USGS data.
Radioactive Fallout. Nuclear Fission Products. The evidence from the USGS data makes the case. Far Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
The report covers:
The Radioactive Fallout and Fission Products
The Seismographic Evidence
The Residual Heat, Hot Spots and Molten Steel
The Blast Signature
Unique and Disturbing Features of the WTC "Weapon"
Overall Evidence for a Core Meltdown and the its Effects on New York
This report will be of service to the 911 Research Community, the Public, the People of New York and those who are working to bring the perpetrators of this crime to justice.
To those who believe that this information should not be made widely known - I say that this information must no longer be swept under the carpet. The data is in the Public Domain. Its implications must be brought to wider attention, so that it can be further investigated and appropriate measures taken to ensure the health and safety of New York.
In 1986, the US Congressional Sub Committee on Energy Conservation and Power released a report: "American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on US Citizens". Surreptitious administration of radioactive substances to New York prison inmates was still going on in 1994.
The Sierra Club have described in their report "Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero" how people were told to clean up the dust themselves. No special precautions were necessary, the EPA continuously assured them. Specialist cleanup contractors were rarely used. Thousands of people have been needlessly and callously exposed.
In an interview with MSNBC, Marianne Harinko, Acting EPA Administrator at the time said before she resigned:
"I pray to God that in the event of another terrorist attack, God Forbid, we as an agency would be equipped to get the data analysed and posted to the public. God forbid there is a dirty bomb".
You can Download an Extract and Order The Report by clicking on the buttons below.
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/Report.htm
===========================================================================================
Analysis & Links
The Last Wave from Port Chicago
1/10/07: This website has just come to my attention. It is one of the most important websites in the world. It presents the results of over 20 years investigative research by Peter Vogel, former Secretary of the Board of Directors of the New Mexico Energy Research and Development Institute.
His research shows that the first atomic test of the modern age did not take place at Alamorgodo on the 16th July 1945.
The first atomic test of the modern age took place at the US Naval Dockyard of Port Chicago, 30 miles north of San Francisco, at 10.30pm on the 17th July 1944.
Hundreds of US Navy personnel and civilians were sacrificed in a covert test to validate the theoretical models and evaluate the "combat" effects of a nuclear explosion on humans.
Donald M. Kerr, Director of Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory told Mr Vogel: "You will never be able to prove it".
In 1981, the Los Alamos archivist "who had come to Los Alamos in 1945 as the first postwar archivist when the only archived materials at the lab were those that had originated with the Manhattan Project" told Mr Vogel: "To understand that we could have done that to our own men, I had to remember that the men killed in the explosion were mostly n***ers."
The bitter truth is revealed. From sending soldiers to walk towards atmospheric nuclear fireballs; to nuclear test holidays in Las Vegas; to injecting prisoners with radioactive materials; to considering those living downwind of Hanford as economically unimportant; to spraying the Middle East and Balkans with "Depleted" Uranium - the very first atomic bomb explosion started the Atomic Age as they intended to continue it: by treating human beings as disposable laboratory animals.
To vapourise 3,000 people and contaminate the whole of New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout is just a logical continuation of a long line of such "experiments".
Who - or What - are these patently Inhuman "They" who have been perpetrating this Nuclear Holocaust upon humanity for over 60 years?
Environmental Studies of the World Trade Centre Area after the September 11, 2001 Attack
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-010429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
This link is to the Forensic Data which proves that the WTC was subjected to intense nuclear explosions.
On September 17th and 18th 2001, two scientists from the USGS collected samples of dust from Lower Manhattan where it had been deposited by the collapse. Their report OFR-01-0429 was published on November 27th 2001.
This link is to the table of data showing the concentration of different elements in the dust, including unprecedented quantities of Strontium, Barium, Cerium, Lanthanum and Yttrium.
Project Gabriel
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/meet11/brief11/tab_i/br11i1a.txt
This is a useful document from the National Security Archive at George Washington University. It is a document from the 1950s on Project Gabriel - a project to determine how nuclear fallout from US atomic bomb tests is distributed across the world and the biological uptake of fallout products.
The uptake of Strontium 90 in children’s milk teeth was used to monitor fallout across the world up to the 1980s. Few countries now continue this practice, since Sr 90 levels had been continually falling since the ending of atmospheric atomic bomb tests in the 1960s. However, in 2003 it was reported that the levels of Sr 90 in US children’s milk teeth had started to rise again, from the scattered monitoring still going on. There can only be one explanation for this - SR 90 is being released into the atmosphere again from clandestine atmospheric nuclear explosions. The Indian and Pakistan tests were contained underground and could not release SR 90 into the environment.
This rise in SR 90 levels is proof that clandestine atmospheric nuclear explosions are taking place. If “Ground Zero: WTC” was not the only source, it is certainly one of the sources.
“A theoretical analysis of the long range aspects of GABRIEL was made in 1949 by Dr. Nicholas M. Smith, Jr., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, at the request of the Atomic Energy Commission. Smith concluded that Sr-90 is by far the most hazardous isotope resulting from nuclear detonations...”
The Trouble with Steven E. Jones’ 911 Research
http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewstory.php?storyid=7095
This is an article by Morgan Reynolds on Professor Steven Jones and his well known “thermite” theory for the destruction of the Twin Towers.
There are some very interesting photographs, of the streets being washed down afterwards. Cars were burned in a peculiar way, warped, with one half burned and the other half untouched. Plastic upholstery in the cars unburned. There are reports of paper being untouched, while metal burned and people were vapourised.
Washing is standard practice to remove radioactive contamination.
The burning of metal but not paper or plastic is very interesting. As I go into in the report, there are aspects of the fallout which lead you to conclude that the “device” produced extremely intense neutron radiation.
It was not just an explosive device - it was also a Neutron Bomb.
Metal objects would block and absorb the neutrons and so heat up instantly, whereas paper and plastic would offer no resistance and the neutrons would just pass through. Hence metal burns while paper is untouched.
The Human Body is 70% water. Water is one of the best neutron absorbers, used as a radiation shield. In an intense neutron flux, people would probably turn to plasma and evaporate. This was always one of the “horrors” of the Neutron Bomb scare in the 1970s, when it was proposed to stop the Russian tanks from rolling across the North European Plain. The Neutron Bomb would kill people but leave infrastructure etc. intact.
Why the WTC “Device” produced directed neutron beams from a central explosive source is intriguing. In the report we touch on the technological appearance of Koenig’s Sphere which took pride of place in WTC Plaza and somehow managed to survive, largely intact. I doubt it was just “modern art”. It looks like an eyeball - i.e. a wave collection and amplifying device.
In an advanced form of nuclear reactor, one would not simply create an “atomic pile” to create sufficient neutron density to initiate the fission chain reaction, by amassing enough “critical mass” of uranium together in a big lump. How crude. One would use a Laser approach to amplify the neutron emissions from a relatively small amount of material, by resonance, to build up the amplitude and energy into a concentrated and coherent neutron beam. A NASER - Neutron Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Neutron pulses would then be fired at the fissile material to initiate nuclear fission.
However, if we are going to go to the trouble of creating these High Energy Neutrons, another vista opens up - nuclear fission using Uranium 238 rather than Uranium 235. In fact, that is the whole motivation to create High Energy Neutrons at all, so that nuclear reactors can be powered by the abundant U238 rather than scarce U235.
Over 99% of natural Uranium is in the form of the U238 isotope and 0.7% is in the form of the U235 isotope. In a conventional nuclear reactor only U235 can be used to generate power. U235 will fission when hit by the “slow” or low energy neutrons emitted by other U235 atoms when they decay. Therefore a “critical mass” of U235 must be accumulated, so that the neutrons emitted by the entire mass of U235 will sustain a fission chain reaction. This is why natural Uranium is “enriched” to about 5% U235 and 95% U238 for nuclear fuel. The chain reaction in the reactor is then controlled by the moderator rods, cooling system etc.
Uranium 238 is useless in this system because it will only fission when struck by High Energy Neutrons. Proposals have existed for decades to build reactors using the principle called Accelerator Driven Fission. High energy neutrons are produced in a particle accelerator and used to bombard U238, creating fission and power. One advantage of this is that it is much safer. There is no self sustaining chain reaction - if the accelerator is switched off, the reactor shuts down and there is no chance of a runaway core meltdown or Chernobyl Syndrome. Abundant U238 and existing nuclear waste stockpiles can be used as fuel, transmuting them into safe disposable by-products.
I do not believe that 60 years after the original Manhattan Project, that the US Military have not made this obvious next technological step.
Indeed, the next obvious step is not just to use a brute force “particle accelerator” to produce the neutrons but to develop a Neutron Laser as I outlined above.
The reactor would look something like this. A central sphere containing the fissile material - U238, surrounded by say 32 Neutron Laser Guns. The rate of power production from the reactor would then be controlled by the Pulse Repetition Rate of the NASERS. The power output could be turned up and down at will by turning a dial.
Now we come to how the whole reactor could be destroyed at once in a massive fission event. The NASERS would all be turned up to maximum. The U238 would all fission in a massive “power excursion” leaving a molten pool of material. As the whole system was destroyed, neutron pulses from the NASERS would escape, not to mention the intense secondary neutron emission from the entire mass of U238 and its daughter products fissioning in a confined space (neutron leakage). There would indeed be an enormous explosion, an atomic blast, but unlike a U235 blast there would be no self sustained chain reaction. Because High Energy Neutrons are required to fission the U238, a relatively small explosion was produced in comparison to the quantity of U238 which must have fissioned.
This is of course now moving firmly into the domain of hypothesis. It is the purpose of hypothesis to try and explain or postulate explanations which best account for known facts, based on our state of knowledge.
We know that over 700ppm of Strontium and over 500pm of Barium was present in the dust. We therefore know that at least 500 tonnes of Uranium were fissioned per tower. We therefore deduce the nuclear device was some sort of reactor, not an atomic bomb. We have evidence of intense radiation beams, consistent with neutron emission and we know that if 500 tonnes of Uranium from a conventional reactor had fissioned in a chain reaction all at once, containing 5% U235, the Atlantic Ocean would now be filling the crater where New York City used to be. Therefore, we put forward the hypothesis that the reactor was instead some form of High Energy Neutron reactor, using much more stable U238, which produced much less explosive energy when hundreds of tonnes of it underwent instantaneous fission.
Koenig’s Sphere may be a model of part of the device - hidden in plain sight for all to see.
The Dark Side of Professor Jones
http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Eholmgren/darkside.html
This is a detailed critique by Gerard Holmgren of Professor Jones’ hypotheses. As Mr Holmgren says, the demolition of the WTC is not a hypothesis - it is a fact proven by prima facie evidence.
Controlled Demolition Inc.
http://www.controlled-demolition.com
Controlled Demolition Inc. are by now well known in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading experts on the subject of controlled demolitions. Many have inferred that their involvement in the clean-up operation after 911 is evidence that they were involved in setting up the building for demolition beforehand. I think this is unlikely. I base this on the revealing interview given by Mr Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI, to New Scientist magazine published on July 24th 2004. This interview should be read by all 911 researchers - salient extracts are in the "Ground Zero" report.
CDI's web site presents many photographs of controlled demolitions in progress. The sequence of photographs taken during the demolition of a building in Sao Paulo show very clearly the famous "squibs" firing out of upper floors at the beginning of the operation, similar to those seen at the WTC.
There is no doubt that conventional demolition charges were used in the Twin Towers. Why do this if the towers are going to be destroyed by nuclear devices? The pre-positioned conventional charges could not possibly have any controlling effect on the power of the nuclear blast.
The reason - Layers of Deep Black Cover. They know that anyone looking at it afterwards with any intelligence will see the towers were blown up with enormous force. But they do not want anyone to suspect it was a nuclear device. So they cover it with evidence of a conventional controlled demolition. This diverts attention away from the fact that they were not simply imploded but volcanically exploded, from the top down.
The military use different levels of secrecy and cover stories to mount "Black Ops". One set of operatives are given one reason for what they are doing. Another team, with no mutual knowledge of the other teams, is given a different set of tasks with a different cover story and so on. Everything is compartmentalised on a "need to know" basis so nobody has the complete picture except a few pulling the strings at the top.
One team, for example, may have been assigned to electronically hijack the aircraft or direct the "drones" by electronic remote control. They think the new "Gulf of Tonking" attack will be limited to the aircraft crashes. Level One. Another is assigned to plant the charges, under pretence of an anti-terrorist exercise. Another squad know it's for real and oversee it. They don't know it's going to be nuked. Level Two. The "elite" nuclear demolition team set up what they think are "SADMs" - Small Atomic Demolition Munitions - joking about how "Saddam" will be blamed. Level Three. They don't know that clandestine reactors are going to be sent super-critical. Level Four.
On the day, each team does its job in sequence - unaware that even greater perfidy will follow, executed by an even Blacker team. Afterwards, people who realise they have been used can be liquidated. Even the "patriots" who were prepared to go along with a conventional demolition, to "wake the Americans up for their own good", might have balked at contaminating New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout.
Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/index.htm
ビデオ資料
WTC Nuclear Demolition 2 (part 1)
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=j_H3XzLUijA&mode=related&search=
WTC Nuclear Demolition 2 (part 2)
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=PBKbYsdlDGU&mode=related&search=
WTC Nuclear Demolition 2 (part 3)
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=zxRpYpVL9bE&mode=related&search=
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。