| Tweet |
4月26日付、「Canadian Jewish News」より。
ワシントンD.C周辺を管理する公共交通機関管理局(WMATA)は、「パレスチナのヨルダン川西岸地区、ガザ地区、および東エルサレムにおけるイスラエルの不法な軍事占領」を終結させるため、6月10日に開催される集会のポスターを、5月13日から4週間、地下鉄の20の駅に張るとの決定をした。
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)からこの要請を受けたWMATAは、最初は拒否したが、その後、承諾したとのこと。
面白いと思うのは、WMATAは政府機関のひとつであり、ACLUはNGOだが、毎年、フォード財団とロックフェラー財団から多額の基金を寄せられているところでもある。こういったことを行うのも、手の込んだ芝居の一種か？ それとも"真面目な人”もいて、本気でやっているのか？
しかしアメリカの公共機関でこのようなポスターを張るのは、極めて異例とのこと。
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WMATA
American Civil Liberties Union
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties_Union
http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=11651
April 26, 2007
8 Iyar, 5767
Anti-Israel ad campaign set for Washington subway
By ANDY LEVY-AJZENKOPF
Staff Reporter
WASHINGTON, D.C. - area commuters will be inundated with a controversial poster-ad campaign when they take the city’s subway system next month.
Starting May 13 for four weeks, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has ordered 20 of its subway stations to place posters advertising a June 10 rally to end “Israel’s illegal military occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.”
Initiated by a charity called the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, the 46-by-60-inch posters depict an imposing tank pointing its main firing turret at a child with a schoolbag walking along a dirt road.
“Imagine if this were your child’s path to school. Palestinians don’t have to imagine,” the poster states, before continuing to call for an end to U.S. aid for “Israel’s brutal military occupation… paid for by U.S. taxpayers like you.”
CBS Outdoor, the New York-based firm that places in-station advertising for WMATA, at first refused to consider the poster, but eventually relented to pressure from WMATA and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
According to an April 4 report in the Washington Jewish Week online, the U.S. Campaign contacted the ACLU, which then advised WMATA to order CBS Outdoor to place the posters, citing freedom of speech rights.
Joanne Ferreira, a WMATA spokesperson, said, “We didn’t have any problem with the ad. It was a First Amendment issue.”
In the same report, Oren Segal, a spokesperson for the Anti-Defamation League said, “If past events by this organization are any indication, it will make no attempt to present a balanced view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and this ad is a pure reflection of that.”
Jodi Senese, CBS Outdoor’s executive vice-president in charge of marketing, explained to The CJN last week why she first turned away the poster.
“I initially rejected it on grounds that I thought it was too inflammatory to children,” she said over the phone from her Manhattan office.
Senese recalled that she told U.S. Campaign staff that if they wanted to raise awareness for their campaign, she was fine with it based on First Amendment rights, “but not like this,” she said.
The U.S. Campaign claims 250 member organizations in the United States. Its website features a prominent logo with the slogan, “Apartheid: Wrong for South Africans. Wrong for Palestinians.”
Senese, who is Jewish, indicated that though she was uneasy with the ad, her personal feelings were not a part of her initial decision to dismiss the ad.
“I’m very proud [of being a Jew],” Senese said. “I thought the image was inflammatory, but I also believe in our First Amendment rights. As Jews [in America], we thrive on that right as well.”
Senese indicated at the time of the interview, that to her knowledge no other group had yet come forward with a counter-campaign for CBS Outdoor to run.
Arthur Spitzer, who is Jewish and the legal director for the ACLU in the National Capital Area, told the Washington Jewish Week it wasn’t “a case about Judaism or Israel… but about establishing someone’s right to freedom of speech, which I agree with regardless of whether I agree with their particular political position.”
Jewish organizations in the D.C. area downplayed the seriousness of the upcoming campaign.
Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, president of Washington-based pro-Israel think-tank, the Israel Project, said her organization didn’t consider the ad campaign worth wasting resources to counter in the media and expected the ads to have a “minimum impact.”
She said when the Israel Project and other prominent Jewish organizations in the area first learned about the ad, they worried about its “ominous” potential.
They discussed the matter at length and then conducted several focus group studies on the ad with dozens of “highly educated people” before concluding the ad wasn’t worth combating actively.
In fact, Laszlo Mizrahi claimed that of the dozens who analyzed the ad in the focus groups, upon first glance most thought the tank was an American one surrounded by Iraqi children. And even when they read the poster’s words, participants had little sympathy for the cause, she said.
“It’s a poorly run... poorly executed campaign and the American people are onto [the U.S. Campaign’s] game,” Laszlo Mizrahi said. “There are real, legitimate threats to the U.S.-Israel relationship – this is just not one of them.
“If these guys want to build support for their cause, they need to have something to sell that doesn’t encourage children to blow themselves up.”
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。