| Tweet |
“The 9/11 Solution”がGoogleによって削除された
先日下記の投稿でお知らせした
http://www.asyura2.com/07/war88/msg/754.html
投稿者 バルセロナより愛を込めて 日時 2007 年 2 月 12 日 07:27:36
こうして９・１１神話が植えつけられた：みんなが見逃していた大きな鍵【解説和訳、ビデオ紹介】
ビデオ“The 9/11 Solution”がGoogleによって２月１４日に一方的に削除されたようです。よっぽど「やばい」内容だったのでしょう。
幸いにしてビデオの内容は私が上の阿修羅投稿に書きとめています。「やばい」情報の抹消は今に始まったことではないのですが、インターネット情報の裏にどれほど大きな権力が働きかけているのか、肝に銘じておくべきでしょう。意識すると否とに関わらず、すでに全世界ファシズムの時代に突入しているのです。
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/80.html
This video was removed from Google Video on February 13, 2007 without explanation. YouTube blocked my attempt to publish it this morning (February 14).
Before it was removed, this page received 19,802 visits in four days.
I have read Google's terms of service and in no way does this video violate any of them.
I am the creator of this video and its copyright owner. The video's content is not illegal, obscene, an invasion of anyone's privacy, an incitement to hate or a graphic potrayal of violence.
He's an explanation of what Google is preventing you from seeing:
Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:
1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge
2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition
A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks.
Specifically:
1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.
2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.
3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.
How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?
Were these stories prepared in advance?
There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."
Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.
Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.
If you want an update on the status of this video and where you can see it in the future, please add your name to the Brasscheck TV subscribers list in the box below
- Re: “The 9/11 Solution” 現在こちらで見ることができるようです。 shimbi 2007/2/17 05:02:18
(0)
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。