| Tweet |
(回答先: 歴史に残る世紀のビックリ映像：誘拐されたBBCガザ特派員の救命嘆願署名が突然打ち切られた理由 投稿者 馬場英治 日時 2007 年 4 月 07 日 08:03:08)
The reason why the Call for Lifesaving Petition of the BBC Gaza correspondent is abruptly closed
So early as we are at the end of the fourth week after the BBC Gaza correspondent Alan Johnston abducted by four masked gunmen nearby his home on March 12. Where is a UK journalist who adhered to stay in Gaza and continued to send valuable information from the local to the world, while every foreign media pulled their dispatched persons one after another on the plea of public security deterioration ? Gathering not even a few information worth to give us a clue, just merciless time passes by the minute as harshly as cruel debt-collector. He lived the land Gaza, fitted in the country, and zealously cultivated his acquaintance with the people. He loved the sea of Gaza, and so was loved by everyone. He was an irreplaceable friend of Palestine, and was one of rare companions in whom Palestinian people had their faith full-heartedly.→Palestinian journalist's letter to Alan Johnston Who and for what purposes kidnapped Johnston ? What do they demand ? But, no information at all coming through any channels telling that criminal group got contacted. Where on earth, what is happening ? What is going on ? Nobody knows. My obsession is involved in the following question directly. "Who gave BBC the authorized information that WTC7 is fated to be collapsed ?" This question should be the master key to solve all the hundreds of profound and complicated riddles surrounding 911. We had never known even the existence of such a key so far. It was found more recently. Until some predetermined time passed, It had slept away in an enormously huge archive on the Internet called "Internet Archive", which would store ideally all the snapshots in ideally all the sites ideally forever. Then the time expired, the golden key was got out of there, and fell into the fire. Who is the person who picks up the key in the flame? Let the question above be [X] and the answer of the question [Y], further let the BBC reporter be [J], the corporation BBC [B], and the criminal group [Z]. Then it is considered to be possible that the following two events happen in the same probability. 1. [Z] holds reporter [J] demanding [B] answer [Y] of question [X]. While each of them demands the corporation [B] a response of question [X] with hostage [J], there exists a difference like that the first asks the answer but the second asks the denegation of the answer. In the first case, [B] rejects the answer and would like to negotiate proposing alternative bargaining point (e.g. money). In this case, it is almost unimaginable that [Z] will kill the hostage. Because the benefit of [Z] obtained by killing the hostage is bound to minus value. In the second case, the corporation [B] accepts the demand promptly and promises to keep denying the answer of question [X], i.e., to keep profound silence for all time. Is the demand by [Z] to [B] fulfilled ? If it is, then the hostage means to be released safely. Undoubtedly there must be a mortgage which guarantees the performance of the obligation of [B]. Mortgage is a compulsory certification to force the partner incur a detriment when the party does not fulfill the obligation. There are two ways to make a detriment against the partner. One is to take some valuable resource from the partner, and the other is to add the harm to the relevant. As for murder of the hostage it is a securement of the mortgage by the second way. No need more explanation, it is an "exemplary exercise" as a certification to secure the performance of the obligation. In the second case, it is easy to see that the equality "the answer of question [X] = [Y] = [Z]" stands. Hence the below comes to light. "Who gave BBC the authorized info that WTC7 is fated to be collapsed ?" "It is the one who abducted the BBC reporter and plans murder." Thus far we proceeded along the story that [Z] makes a negotiation with [B] in need of our demonstration, but it is obvious that [Z] has no need to notify [B] as for the captive of reporter [J]. Because as [B] knows the answer [Y] of question [X] in advance, it is able to presume [Y] = [Z]. As for the effect of "exemplary exercise" even though it may possibly increase, it never decreases by not making a bargaining. After all, is the golden key of no use ? No, not at all. It should be said that the key is not yet tried. Although I wrote many pessimistic things, I firmly believe Johnston's return to life. Our fight will start from the place where Alan Johnston is recaptured. The full page ad of Call for Release Alan Johnston Petition with 300 prominent journalist signatures was displayed in Guardian newspaper on April 2. BBC published the petition on-line, and simultaneously began to accept additional signatures. The number of undersigned people reached at about 8000 within a few days, but the broadcaster abruptly froze the book and stopped additional acceptance. Presently approximately 2000 signatures can be read at the site. BBC has promised that they will release all lists of names in suitable time, but there is no explanation concerning why the book was frozen. Certainly the figure 8000 is satisfiable for the organizer. Considering the slowdown of the petition with the current number 3755 on the open letter to BBC which had started earlier, this figure looks more brightly. However this is a petition which seeks for lifesaving ! If it is, then shouldn't it be continued till the day when the captured person is recaptured ? What is the reason to close the door too far in advance while the person Alan Johnston himself has not returned yet ? It might be that BBC feared the petition excessively overheated. Otherwise conversely it may be interpreted that they were worried of the coming sunset, which means the day when destiny of the unfortunate journalist decides. Anyway I feel a strong doubt in this measure of BBC. Although it may be that my regret is working here, where I missed the occasion to participate the petition while I had hesitated in a day. We Appeal for Immediate and Unconditional Release of BBC Correspondent Alan Johnston!
Is he still alive ? No, that isn't. In the first place why he must die ? Who are going to kill him ? I might be too eccentric. But, I, my sense of smell cannot help getting a stench of death here. The vigil kept by his friends was bitter than an actual funeral, wasn't it ? The full page ad in Guardians of call for his release petition was brazenly calm as a stone monument commemorating something. wasn't it ? A bunch of briefs found in the BBC site were too objective and sounded like inorganic voices as broadcasting of notifications of the war dead, wasn't it ?
2. [Z] holds reporter [J] demanding [B] denegation of answer [Y] of question [X].
[POSTED]
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/theory-edge/message/12894
http://richardtomlinson.wordpress.com/2006/08/25/explanation-of-this-blog/#comments
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。