| Tweet |
日銀も含めて中央銀行は政府機関ではなく、民間銀行の談合組織みたいなものなのである。中央銀行の利権規模は文字通り100兆単位に上る。究極の搾取機構というべきであろ。我々の世代において絶対にやらなければいけないことは中央銀行の国有化（大多数の人は日銀は政府機関として誕生したと勘違いしているわけなのだが）、ならびに日銀総裁の公選制度導入であろう。繰り返すが金利の恣意的操作と、メディアによる民心の操作ができれば、バブル経済の演出（さらに外交政策の操作が加われば戦争の演出も）など自由自在なのである。
ただひとつ心配なのはポール議員の身の安全である。
以下はこのポール議員のコメントに関する、某英国経済ブログへの私の投稿
引用開始
Again the points Ron Paul approproately makes, directly apply to the UK housing bubble. Just read the BoE instead of the Fed. And these points happened to have been made by me. Those in control of central banks, major media and governments can create and prick economic bubbles at their will, to make trillions in the process. Unless you are educated/imformed enough, you are treated like a sucker, and exploited and wasted to the last. Yet even worse is the manupulation/manufacturing of hostilities between nations, peoples and religions, etc, to create hitherto wars between nation states, as well as wars on terror in the 21th century. Again they ruthlessly make trillions in the process, weapons consumption, rebuilding, and explicit snatching of oil interests (or cash in billions as witnessed in Bagdag in 2003) This sorry business has been their family business for centuries, and they are determined to 'live on' the hositilities between Muslims and non-Muslims for the time being.
From now you may wish to look at Merding King's behavior as a professional actor's performance. He must act like a guardian of the monetary health of a nation on the face of it. In reality he is thinking about how blamelessly to perform the pricking of this unprecedented economic bubble in the history of Britain. As I have maintained time and again, he could have doused the clearly overheated economy and housing market circa 2000, and so could the media.
We have been mercilessly criticizing Sayara Beg here, deservedly to a degree, perhaps. But we must not overlook the real culprit who design, and execute plans to drive these ignorant herd of millions at their will.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007 07:58:50 AM
引用ここまで
以下ロン・ポール議員のコメント
Don't Blame the Market for Housing Bubble
March 19, 2007
The U.S. housing market, long considered vulnerable by many economists, is now on the verge of suffering a serious collapse in many regions. Commodities guru and hedge fund manager Jim Rogers warns that real estate in expensive bubble areas will drop 40 or 50%. Mainstream media outlets like the New York Times are reporting breathlessly about the possibility of widespread defaults on subprime mortgages.
When the bubble finally bursts completely, millions of Americans will be looking for someone to blame. Look for Congress to hold hearings into subprime lending practices and 菟redatory・mortgages. We値l hear a lot of grandstanding about how unscrupulous lenders took advantage of poor people, and how rampant speculation caused real estate markets around the country to overheat. It will be reminiscent of the Enron hearings, and the message will be explicitly or implicitly the same: free-market capitalism, left unchecked, leads to greed, fraud, and unethical if not illegal business practices.
But capitalism is not to blame for the housing bubble, the Federal Reserve is. Specifically, Fed intervention in the economy-- through the manipulation of interest rates and the creation of money-- caused the artificial boom in mortgage lending.
The Fed has roughly tripled the amount of dollars and credit in circulation just since 1990. Housing prices have risen dramatically not because of simple supply and demand, but because the Fed literally created demand by making the cost of borrowing money artificially cheap. When credit is cheap, individuals tend to borrow too much and spend recklessly.
This is not to say that all banks, lenders, and Wall Street firms are blameless. Many of them are politically connected, and benefited directly from the Fed痴 easy money policies. And some lenders did make fraudulent or unethical loans. But every cent they loaned was first created by the Fed.
The actions of lenders are directly attributable to the policies of the Fed: when credit is cheap, why not loan money more recklessly to individuals who normally would not qualify? Even with higher default rates, lenders could make huge profits simply through volume. Subprime lending is a symptom of the housing bubble, not the cause of it.
Fed credit also distorts mortgage lending through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government schemes created by Congress supposedly to help poor people. Fannie and Freddie enjoy an implicit guarantee of a bailout by the federal government if their loans default, and thus are insulated from market forces. This insulation spurred investors to make funds available to Fannie and Freddie that otherwise would have been invested in other securities or more productive endeavors, thereby fueling the housing boom.
The Federal Reserve provides the mother痴 milk for the booms and busts wrongly associated with a mythical 澱usiness cycle.・span style="mso-spacerun: yes; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt"> Imagine a Brinks truck driving down a busy street with the doors wide open, and money flying out everywhere, and you値l have a pretty good analogy for Fed policies over the last two decades. Unless and until we get the Federal Reserve out of the business of creating money at will and setting interest rates, we will remain vulnerable to market bubbles and painful corrections. If housing prices plummet and millions of Americans find themselves owing more than their homes are worth, the blame lies squarely with Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke.
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。