| Tweet |
以下のブログ情報の紹介とコメント。
今回のヒースロー空港を舞台とした「テロ」容疑者たちは爆弾を制作せす、いずれも航空券を持っていなかった。また、その多くはパスポートすらもっていなかった（去年の７・７ロンドン「テロ」で容疑者とされた人物が自爆テロなのに往復切符を買っていたことが思い出される）。
そして、容疑者たちは、一年以上の長期間、当局の観察下にあった。これを評して、英政府の「テロ在庫管理」と言われている。必要なときはこの在庫へ発注するのだ。
今回の「事件」の疑問の一つは、重大なテロと騒ぐ割りには、発覚後すぐに「テロ計画」公表せず、なぜ、容疑者の逮捕後に事件を公表したのか、という点。
(答えはわかっているわけだが。イスラエルのレバノン侵攻バックアップ、ブッシュの中間選挙応援などなど。)
さらに、決定的なことは、今回もまた、テロでっち上げ「前科のある」パキスタンからの情報によっていたことだ。パキスタン情報局ＩＳＩこそ、ビンラディンをＣＩＡとともに育成してきた機関。９１１テロの容疑者アタに１万ドルの資金提供をしたのはパキスタンの軍情報統合局長ムハマド・アーマッドであった。パキスタンの情報局（ＩＳＩ）とＭＩ６、ロンドン警視庁は密接な協力関係にあり、前者にはＣＩＡの資金と援助で活動している。
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2006/08/the_uk_terror_p.html
August 14, 2006
The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
I have been reading very carefully through all the Sunday newspapers to try and analyse the truth from all the scores of pages claiming to detail the so-called bomb plot. Unlike the great herd of so-called security experts doing the media analysis, I have the advantage of having had the very highest security clearances myself, having done a huge amount of professional intelligence analysis, and having been inside the spin machine.
So this, I believe, is the true story.
None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.
In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.
What is more, many of those arrested had been under surveillance for over a year - like thousands of other British Muslims. And not just Muslims. Like me. Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need for early arrests.
Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes - which, rather extraordinarily, had not turned up in a year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary information this way. Trouble is it always tends to give the interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What it doesn't give is the truth.
The gentleman being "interrogated" had fled the UK after being wanted for questioning over the murder of his uncle some years ago. That might be felt to cast some doubt on his reliability. It might also be felt that factors other than political ones might be at play within these relationships. Much is also being made of large transfers of money outside the formal economy. Not in fact too unusual in the British Muslim community, but if this activity is criminal, there are many possibilities that have nothing to do with terrorism.
We then have the extraordinary question of Bush and Blair discussing the possible arrests over the weekend. Why? I think the answer to that is plain. Both in desperate domestic political trouble, they longed for "Another 9/11". The intelligence from Pakistan, however dodgy, gave them a new 9/11 they could sell to the media. The media has bought, wholesale, all the rubbish they have been shovelled.
We then have the appalling political propaganda of John Reid, Home Secretary, making a speech warning us all of the dreadful evil threatening us and complaining that "Some people don't get" the need to abandon all our traditional liberties. He then went on, according to his own propaganda machine, to stay up all night and minutely direct the arrests. There could be no clearer evidence that our Police are now just a political tool. Like all the best nasty regimes, the knock on the door came in the middle of the night, at 2.30am. Those arrested included a mother with a six week old baby.
For those who don't know, it is worth introducing Reid. A hardened Stalinist with a long term reputation for personal violence, at Stirling Univeristy he was the Communist Party's "Enforcer", (in days when the Communist Party ran Stirling University Students' Union, which it should not be forgotten was a business with a very substantial cash turnover). Reid was sent to beat up those who deviated from the Party line.
We will now never know if any of those arrested would have gone on to make a bomb or buy a plane ticket. Most of them do not fit the "Loner" profile you would expect - a tiny percentage of suicide bombers have happy marriages and young children. As they were all under surveillance, and certainly would have been on airport watch lists, there could have been little danger in letting them proceed closer to maturity - that is certainly what we would have done with the IRA.
In all of this, the one thing of which I am certain is that the timing is deeply political. This is more propaganda than plot. Of the over one thousand British Muslims arrested under anti-terrorist legislation, only twelve per cent are ever charged with anything. That is simply harrassment of Muslims on an appalling scale. Of those charged, 80% are acquitted. Most of the very few - just over two per cent of arrests - who are convicted, are not convicted of anything to do terrorism, but of some minor offence the Police happened upon while trawling through the wreck of the lives they had shattered.
Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
Flying without liquids
A few useful articles on the latest phony terror scam – aka ‘Operation Save Tony’s Ass’ – from London:
* The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
* The Transatlantic Airplane Bomb Plot Armageddon - DON'T TALK ABOUT IT !
* TERRA! TERRA! TERRA!
* The 10-Year-Old Terrorist Plot
* Doubts Hang Over Terror Plot
* TATP: about that pyro stuff in reports of alleged plane-bomb plot
* Source: U.S., U.K. at odds over timing of arrests
The internet is agog over the revelation in the last article that some of the alleged terrorists hadn’t bothered to obtain passports! It is clear that the governments of the United States, Britain, and Canada have an inventory of suspects under long-term surveillance who can be used as patsies whenever the mood strikes the politicians. The crime of the patsies consists entirely in the fact that they are young Muslim males.
We will continue to be fooled by the politicians as long as they need to hide behind the ‘war on terror’ in order to stay in power. In this case, we have upcoming American elections coupled with Tony’s pressing problem of unpopular support for Israel’s massacre of Lebanese civilians. Therefore, everyone else gets to pay with increasing inconvenience at the airports. The joke is that the inconvenience stays at its highest levels until the airline executives manage to get their phone calls through to the politicians, when suddenly the terrorist threat is reduced a shade or two, just in time to save the airlines from bankruptcy.
This political scam can continue as long as we agree to put up with it. Airline security is a joke, with the neanderthal screeners picking out the 90-year-old grandmothers for strip-searches, and the guards pouring all the chemicals, which supposedly explode on being mixed, into the same vats. Why can’t the terrorists soak their sweaters in one chemical, their shirts in another, and repair to the airplane bathrooms to soak themselves up an explosion when the two chemicals are mixed? Whether they actually do this or not, the politicians can continue to fool us as long as there is a reasonable reason to believe that there is anger in the world-wide Muslim community. The only way to stop the problem in the long term is to stop the root cause, and the root cause is almost entirely Anglo-American support for Zionist wars against Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon.
People forget that the inventor of the ‘war on terror’, the war we are fighting at great expense and inconvenience but can never win, is a guy called Benjamin Netanyahu. He set out the basic principles in books and in a famous speech (or here) he made at the Jewish Agency Assembly Plenary meetings on June 24, 2001 (note the date). On the morning of September 11, Netanyahu said:
“It’s very good. Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel from Americans].”
The plan has always been to involve the Americans and the British in the Zionist phony ‘war on terror’. The ‘war on terror’ is simply a propaganda trick developed to allow Israel to steal land from, amongst others, the Palestinians. Isn’t it time we put an end to the inconvenience, the expense (in money and lives), the fear, and the violence, and stopped dancing to the tune of land thieves like Netanyahu?
- ↑重複していました。「バルセロナより愛を込めて 」さんが下記で紹介していました。お詫びします。 Wotan 2006/8/19 19:17:07
(0)
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。