★阿修羅♪ > 戦争82 > 1025.html ★阿修羅♪ |
Tweet |
2001年11月7日に、BBC放送が報道したNewsnightによるとブッシュ政権がパキスタンの核兵器の生みの親A・Q・カーン博士の核ネットワークの調査を妨害していた事を報道した。(日本の大手商業メディアで報道されたかは不明。たぶんいつものように無視されたと思うけど...)
パキスタンは9.11事件にも関与した可能性が高くISI(パキスタン諜報機関)の長官マフムード・アーメドがモハメド・アッタに10万ドルに送金していた。
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/comp/articleshow?xml=0&art_id=1454238160
さらに9.11当日(事件が起こった時に)にはマフムード長官がアメリカの政治家たちと会談していた事がわかっている。
http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/14/human_spies/index.html
パキスタンとアメリカはソ連のアフガン侵攻からタリバン政権誕生さらには現在でも密接にリンクしているのでここで書くには長すぎるから省きます(カーンもそういう流れから生まれた御用科学者である可能性も排除できない。(アルカイナは今さら言うまでも無い))
話を戻すとA・Q・カーンの核ネットワークのリストには北朝鮮も含まれており北朝鮮が核兵器を保有(小型化に成功?)したのならグレッグ・パラストが言うようにブッシュ政権(歴代のアメリカ政権も含めて)の功罪はでかいといえる。
http://asyura2.com/0601/war82/msg/584.html
■Khan Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistans Dr. Strangelove, BBC reported in 2001
Monday, February 9, 2004
On November 7, 2001, BBC Television's Newsnight and the Guardian of London reported that the Bush administration thwarted investigations of Dr. A.Q. Khan, known as the "father" of Pakistan's atomic bomb. This week, Khan confessed to selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.
The Bush Administration has expressed shock at disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British news teams' sources within US intelligence agencies, shortly after President Bush's inauguration, his National Security Agency (NSA) effectively stymied the probe of Khan Research Laboratories, the Pakistani agency in charge of the bomb project. CIA and other agents told BBC they could not investigate the spread of Islamic Bombs through Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.
Greg Palast and David Pallister received a California State University Project Censored Award for this expose based on the story broadcast by Palast on BBC television's top current affairs program.
According to both sources and documents obtained by the BBC, the Bush Administration spike of the investigation of Dr. Khans Lab followed from a wider policy of protecting key Saudi Arabians including the Bin Laden family.
Noam Chomsky, after reading the story on page one of the Times of India, commented, Why wasnt this all over US papers?
To learn why, read the following excerpt from the 2003 edition of Palasts book, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy:
■The "Back-Off" Directive and the Islamic Bomb
... A top-level CIA operative who spoke with us [at BBC Television] on condition of strictest anonymity said that, after Bush took office, "There was a major policy shift" at the National Security Agency. Investigators were ordered to "back off " from any inquiries into Saudi Arabian financing of terror networks, especially if they touched on Saudi royals and their retainers. That put the Bin Ladens, a family worth a reported $12 billion and a virtual arm of the Saudi royal household, off limits for investigation. Osama was the exception; he remained a wanted man, but agents could not look too closely at how he filled his piggy bank. The key rule of any investigation, "follow the money," was now violated, and investigations-at least before September 11-began to die.
And there was a lot to investigate-or in the case of the CIA and FBI under Bush-a lot to ignore. Through well-known international arms dealers (I'm sorry, but in this business, sinners are better sources than saints) our team was tipped off to a meeting of Saudi billionaires at the Hotel Royale Monceau in Paris in May 1996 with the financial representative of Osama bin Laden's network. The Saudis, including a key Saudi prince joined by Muslim and non-Muslim gun traffickers, met to determine who would pay how much to Osama. This was not so much an act of support but of protection-a pay off to keep the mad bomber away from Saudi Arabia.
The crucial question here is that, if I could learn about this meeting, how did the CIA miss it? In fact, since the first edition of this book, other sources have disclosed that the meeting was monitored by French intelligence. Since U.S. intelligence was thus likely informed, the question becomes, Why didn't our government immediately move against the Saudis?
I probed our CIA contact for specifics of investigations that
were hampered by orders to back off of the Saudis. He told us that the Khan Laboratories investigation had been effectively put on hold.
You may never have heard of Khan Laboratories, but if this planet blows to pieces this year, it will likely be thanks to Khan Labs' creating nuclear warheads for Pakistan's military. Because investigators had been tracking the funding for this so-called "Islamic Bomb" back to Saudi Arabia, under Bush security restrictions, the inquiry was stymied. (The restrictions were lifted, the agent told me without a hint of dark humor, on September 11.)
Dr. A. Q. Khan is the Dr. Strangelove of Pakistan, the "father" of their bomb and, says a former associate, a crusader for its testing . . . on humans. On April 25, 1998, Khan met at the Kushab Research Center with General Jehangir Karamat, then army chief of staff, to plan a possible preemptive nuclear strike on New Delhi, India. The Saudis lit a fuse under this demented scheme by telling Pakistan intelligence that Israel had shipped India warplanes in preparation for a conventional attack on Pakistan. We only know these details because a young researcher who claims he was at the meeting wrote a horrified letter threatening to make the plan to bomb India public, a threat which appears to have halted the scheme.
After writing down his objections, the whistle-blower, Iftikhar Khan-Chaudhry, ran for his life to London, then the USA, seeking asylum. Khan-Chaudhry, when questioned, seemed to know too little to be the top nuclear physicist he claimed, and far too much about A. Q. Khan's bomb factory to be the tile company accountant Pakistan claims. Pakistan police, failing to arrest him, jailed, beat and raped his wife, suggesting they wanted him to keep secret something more interesting than bookkeeping methods.
Whether his story was real or bogus, I can't possibly tell. The point is that intelligence agencies under Clinton, based on many other leads as well, were following up on the Saudi connection until the Bush team interfered.
Subscribe to Greg Palast's writings and view his report for BBC on the Bin Ladins and the Bushes at www.GregPalast.com.
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=312