| ★阿修羅♪ > 戦争79 > 741.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
| Tweet |
イラン攻撃は不可避で3月28日とのロシア情報
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/070206attackiran.htm
Russian MP Says US To Attack Iran Late March
Muslim riots a US psyop aimed at getting EU support for war
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | February 7 2006
A top Russian parliamentary leader has told Ekho Moskvy radio station that an attack on Iran is inevitable and that it will occur on March 28th. The leader of the Liberal Democrats Vladimir Zhirinovsky also believes that the Muslim riots were orchestrated by the US to garner European backing for the military strike.
Rhetoric has heated significantly in the past week with Donald Rumsfeld yesterday warning that a military option was on the table, echoing the comments of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who said that the US was prepared to take military action.
Also, Israeli acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated that Iran would pay "a very heavy price" if the Islamic Republic defiantly resumes full-scale uranium enrichment to build nuclear weapons.
Zhirinovsky told the Russian radio station that, "The war is inevitable because the Americans want this war. Any country claiming a leading position in the world will need to wage wars. Otherwise it will simply not be able to retain its leading position."
"The date for the strike is already known ﾑ it is the election day in Israel (March 28). It is also known how much that war will cost,ﾓ said Zhirinovsky.
Commenting on the Muslim riots sweeping the Middle East and Europe, Zhirinovsky (pictured above) said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to "provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic world".
"It will all end with European countries thanking the United States and paying, and giving soldiers," said Zhirinovsky.
The possible inorganic manufactured nature of the riots has to be seriously considered. The three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who ﾒcirculated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,ﾓ according to the London Telegraph.
It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out.
It now comes to light that Merete Eldrup, managing director of JP/Politikens Hus, the company that published the cartoons, is the wife of Anders Eldrup. Anders Eldrup is a Bilderberg member who has attended the last five Bilderberg meetings. The Bilderberg Group is a shadowy organization that meets once a year to steer global policy. It is now widely acknowledged that Bilderberg set the date for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The violent demonstrations, on the back of last November's French riots, are clearly having the effect of hardening European sympathy towards Muslims, even as the governments of major European countries open the floodgates to mass immigration. This greases the skids for an accelerated invasion of Iran who yesterday announced they were cutting trade with Denmark over the offensive cartoons.
Director of the Russian Political Research Institute Sergei Markov previously warned that Israel was likely to conduct air strikes against Iran in the spring.
The window of opportunity seems to be forming for the US and Israel. The White House meeting memo proves that UN consultations and possible sanctions are mere window dressing for a plan of action that has already been decided upon. What remains to be seen is if the US or Israel will attempt to manufacture a staged war provocation to goad the Iranians into signing their own death warrant. The memo, released by QC Philippe Sands, contained details of a discussion between Tony Blair and George Bush where a plan to paint a US spy plane in UN colors and fly it low over Iraq in the hope that Saddam would order it shot down was debated.
Get Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films by other authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK HERE.
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.allannoble.net/mini_language_analysis_on_possible_preemptive_strike_against_iran.htm
Mini Language Analysis on Possible Preemptive Strike Against Iran
By Allan Noble
January 8, 2006
Political and economic analysts hang onto almost every word that prominent officials make publicly in relation to important matters. This is the case, for instance, whenever Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, mentions the issue of interest rates--any slight deviation of language on interest rates is analyzed in great detail in attempts to forecast whether a rising or a lowering of rates seems to be in store. Public spokespeople, therefore, make every effort to ensure that all public language toes the current official line. Even the smallest slip-up can mean potentially alerting competitors as to their hidden intentions.
As in finance, so in international diplomacy.
Almost a year ago now, on January 17, 2005, Seymour M. Hersh reported in the New Yorker that
The [Bush] Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran at least since last summer. Much of the focus is on the accumulation of intelligence and targeting information on Iranian nuclear, chemical, and missile sites, both declared and suspected. The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids.
Such air and ground forces raids, he said, were being planned by the US in close cooperation with Israel. At the same time, US military contingency operations for an invasion of Iran were being updated at the United States Central Command (USCENTCOM), in Tampa, Florida. These plans were to be in place by June, 2005, according to Scott Ritter, former UN Chief Weapons Inspector in Iraq.
Hersh's claims were so harmful to the Bush administration that the Pentagon immediately published a refutation of the article. Yet, while chipping away at what it says were "errors of fundamental fact" in the piece, it did not directly deny the truth of the central claim--that it was engaged in covert reconnaissance operations for a projected attack upon Iran.
The issue remained dormant for several months, while the US officially pledged to support the Iran-EU-3 (Britain, Germany, and France) talks, to try to reach an acceptable diplomatic solution to the impasse in the Iranian nuclear crisis.
However, on December 11, 2005, the UK's Sunday Times reported that Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, had ordered Israel Defence Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff, Lieutenant General Dan Halutz, to have the final stage of special forces preparations in place for an attack on Iran, by late March, 2006.
Although this charge was quickly denied by Israeli Ministry of Defence official, Maj.-Gen. (Res.) Amos Gilad, he said that the possibility for such a preemptive strike could not be ruled out.
But then came a truly remarkable and fast-paced stream of high-level political, defence, and intelligence, visits between close regional allies, the US, Turkey and Israel:
December 9, 2005 - US FBI Director Robert Mueller, arrives in Turkey, and meets with Turkish Interior Minister, Abdulkadir Aksu, and Turkish Security Chief, Gokhan Aydiner.
December 11-13, 2005 - US CIA Director, Porter Goss, visits Turkey for talks with Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
December 11-19, 2005 - Turkish Land Forces Commander, Gen. Yasar Buyukanit, visits the US, meeting with Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace; Francis Harvey, the US Secretary of the Army; and Eric Edelman, US Undersecretary of Defense.
December 19-21, 2005 - Turkish Air Forces Commander, General Faruk Comert, pays a secretive visit to Israel ("'Comert went to Israel for a three-day visit and returned to Turkey on Wednesday evening,' NTV reported yesterday. However, the Israeli Embassy officials declined to comment on such a visit.")
December 22, 2005 - Israel's IDF Chief of Staff, Dan Halutz, meets in Turkey with Chief of Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces, Gen. Hilmi Ozkok, and Turkish President, Ahmet Necdet Sezer.
The Turkish and German media, reported that according to various intelligence leaks, this flurry of visits had been centered around garnering support from Turkey--which had not allowed the US-led Coalition to use its military bases for the Iraq invasion--for an attack on Iran.
CIA Director, Porter Goss, in his visit, for instance, was said to have presented dossiers to Ankara on Turkey-Iran related matters, including intelligence on Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program; alleged Iranian links to terrorism (including the Kurdish Workers party (PKK)); and Iran's stance towards Turkey. Turkish Foreign Minister, Abdullah Gul, on December 24, rejected these reports as 'pure imagination'.
Yet, given the stance of the US, the EU, and Israel, that the Iranian regime must not be allowed to commence the uranium enrichment stage of the nuclear fuel-cycle upon its own soil, then the fact of the warning of IDF Chief of Staff, Dan Halutz, to Israel's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, on December 13, that Iran is capable of doing so from March, 2006, should be taken seriously. Moreover, Halutz is alleged to have confidently asserted on Jan 3, 2006, that Iran's nuclear program "can be destroyed".
So, getting back to the language...
In a press release on January 5, 2006, entitled ﾔU.S. Will Continue To Press for Expansion of Freedom in Mideastﾕ, US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, stated (emphases added):
In terms of Iran, again, the Iranians are digging their own isolation.ﾊ The United States, mid -- you know, March or so of last year said let's give the diplomacy a chance to work.ﾊ Let's actually even put some things on the table so that our European allies have greater chips to play in the negotiation.ﾊ The Iranians haven't taken the deal.
Now, it's not a matter of diplomacy ending.ﾊ It could be a matter of the negotiations this -- you know, diplomacy also includes what you do in the Security Council.ﾊ So I think that what you're seeing is that people want the Iranians to decide whether or not they're prepared to live with a civil nuclear structure that does not raise proliferation risks or not.ﾊ And when it is clearer, as it is becoming clearer, that they are not prepared to do that, I think you will have a very strong consensus behind a different course of action.
So, given the preceding, what will this, 'ﾔyou know', "different course of action" be?
As with the study of all human and social sciences, international studies is fraught throughout with ﾔnon-rationalﾕ factors, especially when observers and commentators are not privy to insider ﾔsubjectiveﾕ information. Predictions and forecasts, no matter how 'objective' and ﾔrationalﾕ, therefore, are never final.
Nevertheless, if I was a gambling man, I might be tempted to place a small bet on Rices ﾔyou know speech idiosyncrasy ($50 perhaps?). By mid-March (or late March at the latest) diplomacy on the Iranian nuclear issue may well be a thing of the past; the Israeli and US air and ground assault on Iran will have begun. Once again, the neoconservative Bush Administration will have plunged the Middle East further into war.
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。