★阿修羅♪ > ホロコースト3 > 401.html ★阿修羅♪ |
Tweet |
ホロコースト否定を理由にツンデルの弁護士が告発された。
この弁護士は、訴状で、ホロコーストを信じないと主張するイラン大統領、アハマディネジャドの声明を引用した。
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.zundelsite.org/zundel_persecuted/aug08-06_stolz-english.html
Sylvia Stolz, "a German Jeanne d'Arc", charged [with "Holocaust Denial"]
August 8, 2006
The vassal justice system of the Bundesrepublik/present-day Germany has charged Ernst Zundel's defense attorney, Sylvia Stolz, with denial of the Holocaust.
As the defense attorney for German Forces Reserves Physician Colonel, Dr. Rigolf Hennig, who is accused of severe denigration of the present government, Stolz is supposed to have read to the court a newspaper article about the appearance of world renowned Israeli artist, Gilad Atzmon in Bochum. In a public statement, Atzmon is quoted as having said that the written history of the Second World War and the Holocaust are a "complete forgery, initiated by Americans and Zionists".
Further, the defense attorney had cited in a petition the statement of the Iranian Prime Minister Ahmadinedschat that he did not believe in the Holocaust. Additionally, Stolz claimed that the "Lectures on the Holocaust" by Germar Rudolf would "eradicate the Holocaust religion down to the roots".
As if this weren't bad enough, during closing argument in the main trial against Dr. Hennig, she maintained that the German Reich was legally still in effect and that, therefore, the currently existing Bundesrepublik had no jurisdiction over Dr. Hennig's case. She is cited as having stated: "The Lie of the Holocaust is crumbling! Even this Court cannot shut itself off any more with regard to informed doubters."
During the initial stages of the trial, Sylvia Stolz stated that the Holocaust was not "obvious" - as claimed per judicial notice. "Obviousness" was merely faked utilizing evidence tampering, false witness statements, torture, brute force, opinion suppression, threats as to one's loss of livelihood and systematic eradication/annihilation of so-called revisionists, the banning of revisionists' books, and the criminal pursuit of everyone expressing publicly some doubts about the Holocaust. The punishment of Holocaust deniers would come to an end very soon, she said, because too many people worldwide were waking up to the suppressed facts.
Due to the severity of the subject matter, the prosecution moved the matter before a higher court rather than the District Court.
[後略]
----------------------------------------------------------