| Tweet |
今日本では福井日銀総裁がインサイダー取引で逮捕された村上氏のファンドを保有していたと言って騒いでいますが、アメリカでの無法ぶりに比べれば村上氏の違法行為は子供騙しみたいなものです。それよりも、欧米のヘッジファンドが日本でも同じ無法ぶりでお金を日本人から巻き上げているのを弾劾する方が先決問題です。福井氏は欧米支配層の手先として総裁に任命された事は明らかで、私が何度もこの掲示板で書きましたように、欧米の金融業者達が全ての悪の根源です。この世界規模の悪には不正手段でお金を投資家から巻き上げるのは勿論の事、世界中の政治家を買収して金権世界政府を樹立しようと画策し、それに逆らう国は戦争で皆殺しにする事まで入っています。日本国内のコップの中の渦巻きに気を取られてはなりません。
先ずアメリカ政府のサイトからこの６月２８日にあった証言の原文を読んでください。
http://judiciary.senate.gov/testimony.cfm?id=1972&wit_id=5485
証言をしたゲイリー・アグアイヤー氏はSECから頼まれてアメリカの証券市場の不正を調査したのですが、本当のことを書いて報告したために首になったのです。証言の冒頭の部分を見てください。
Mr. Chairman, Senator Leahy, Committee Members:
The subject of your Committee’s hearing today (Hedge Funds and Independent Analysts: How Independent Are Their Relationships?) is the most recent variant of a stubborn question that keeps popping at Senate committee hearings: is federal law enforcement adequately protecting the nation’s capital markets and their participants from the risk of manipulation and fraud by the nation’s 11,500 hedge funds? The answer is no.
And the answer is no whatever facts you consider. It is no when the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) fails to recognize any hedge fund fraud or manipulation against other market participants for a quarter century: from 1979 until 2004. It is no when the SEC fails to protect mutual fund investors when billions of dollars are siphoned from their accounts by hedge funds. It is no when you compare what the SEC is doing and saying about hedge funds with what its counterparts in Europe are doing and saying. It is no when the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) merely shadows the SEC’s meager scrutiny of hedge funds. It is a deafening no when senior SEC officials throw a roadblock in the insider trading investigation of one of the nation’s largest hedge funds because the suspected tipper has powerful political connections, as they did with the investigation assigned to me.
次に１９２０年代にアメリカの証券市場の不正蔓延がもたらした１９２９年の恐慌から学んでSECを設立したしたにも拘わらず、又同じ不正が横行している事を指摘して次のように言っています。
Fixing the SEC so it can protect investors and capital markets from hedge fund abuse will not be an easy task. Powerful interests want the SEC to stay just the way it is or, better yet, to become even weaker. Those interests are not just the hedge funds. They include the financial industries that are receiving tens of billions of dollars in revenues for helping hedge funds cheat other market participants or close their eyes to the carnage. At the top of that list are the big investment banks, e.g., Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns. Those interests know how to reward friends and punish perceived enemies. Their tentacles reach far. They stopped the hedge fund investigation I was assigned to conduct. They cost me my job.
Wall Street’s misuse of influence is nothing new. Ferdinand Pecora sensed this misuse of influence when he conducted the investigation in 1933 and 1934 on behalf of the Senate Banking Committee that led to the adoption of the securities acts and the creation of the SEC. His detailed cross-examination of powerful bankers, brokers, and industrialists revealed the ills the securities acts were designed to cure.
Five years later, he warned in Wall Street under Oath:
Under the surface of the governmental regulation of the securities market, the same forces that produced the riotous speculative excesses of the “wild bull market” of 1929 still give evidences of their existence and influence. Though repressed for the present, it cannot be doubted that, given a suitable opportunity, they would spring back into pernicious activity (emphasis added).
Frequently we are told that this regulation has been throttling the country's prosperity. Bitterly hostile was Wall Street to the enactment of the regulatory legislation. It now looks forward to the day when it shall, as it hopes, reassume the reigns of its former power. . . .
The public, however, is sometimes forgetful. As its memory of the unhappy market collapse of 1929 becomes blurred, it may lend at least one ear to the persuasive voices of The Street subtly pleading for a return to the “good old times.”
この後、ヘッジファンドがどの様に投資家達を騙しているかを長々と説明していますが、或る犯罪者を逮捕する為の証拠を強制徴収しようとすると、
My supervisors enthusiastically endorsed this factual theory of the evidence. On June 14, I briefed Branch Chief Hanson and Assistant Director Kreitman for one hour on the insider trading investigation, including the evidence that pointed to the suspect as the likely tipper. After which, they authorized me to present this same factual theory and evidence to the FBI and the US Attorney’s office in New York, as the first step toward a possible criminal proceeding against both suspects. Accordingly, at a meeting the next day, I presented the information to an Assistant US Attorney and two FBI agents.
A few days after the meeting, I informed Branch Chief Hanson that I intended to issue subpoenas for the suspected tipper’s examination and key documents. He first reacted positively to the suggestion. But a few days later, to my surprise, Hanson abruptly reversed course. Hanson blocked the issuance of subpoenas for the suspected tipper’s testimony and records, stating that it would be difficult to obtain the authority to issue the subpoenas because the suspected tipper had powerful political connections.
Immediately after Hanson’s comment, external interference with the investigation became evident. A high-powered attorney, Mary Jo White, bypassed the normal protocol of discussing the investigation with the assigned staff attorney. Instead, she went directly to Enforcement Director Linda Thomsen, despite the fact Director Thomsen had no prior involvement in the case. For the first time, senior staff left me out of meetings when they discussed the case. Associate Director Paul Berger--who had very limited knowledge of the facts--emphatically stated in my presence that no case would be filed against the suspected tipper, but gave no reason or clue for his decision. Emails between the suspected tipper and tippee that I had subpoenaed from investment banks were delivered by Mary Jo White to Director Thomsen. That had never happened before in the other 100 subpoenas I had issued. My supervisors, who had strongly supported the case only two weeks before, became angry and defensive when I tried to discuss the issuance of the subpoenas.
この後上司達との間でどうしてこの犯罪者の追求が出来ないのかとEメイルのやりとりがあり、アグアイヤー氏が２００５年９月に休暇中にSECから罷免通知が来たとの事です。
この証言で解りますように、今まで私が何度もこの掲示板で述べましたが、アメリカ政府は銀行家と富豪家達で形成した所謂支配層に完全に乗っ取られているのです。従って、SEC等の監督機関は国民を騙すために設置してあるに過ぎず、日本版SECを創設しても官僚の数を増やすだけで何の役にも立たないのです。
それでは支配層に対し政府は何の反撃も加えられないのでしょうか。そうではありません。勇気のある正義漢が軍隊にいれば、彼らを一掃することは可能です。それには覆面のスワット・チームを欧米各国に派遣し、先ず３００人委員会の会員全員を射殺する事です。勿論、会員の中にはロックフェラーとかキッシンジャーとか欧州の女王達も含まれます。日本の皇室関係者も含まれているかも知れません。９−１１テロの様な大規模な工作をやるのに比べれば、３００人の特定人物を射殺するのは簡単な事です。下っ端をいくら退治しても駄目で、労力の無駄です。黒幕を一掃せねば世の中は善くなりません。
投稿コメント全ログ コメント即時配信 スレ建て依頼 削除コメント確認方法
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。