| ★阿修羅♪ > 戦争72 > 398.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
| Tweet |
日経【テロ危険性、イラク戦争などで非常に高まる・英有力研究所】
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nikkei.co.jp/kaigai/eu/20050719D2M1901019.html
テロ危険性、イラク戦争などで非常に高まる・英有力研究所
英有力シンクタンクの王立国際問題研究所は18日発表した報告書で、英国が国際テロ組織アルカイダの標的になる危険性は「米国との同盟関係、アフガニスタン、イラクで軍事行動をとったことで高くなった」と指摘した。
報告書は7日のロンドン同時テロの発生前、英治安当局がイスラム過激派によるテロの脅威を甘くみていたと指摘。米国は英国がテロリストの温床になっていると不満を抱いていたという。イラクで混乱が続き、アルカイダが宣伝や勧誘、資金集めをしやすくなっていると分析した。
（ロンドン＝横田一成）
------------------------------------------------------------
以下と比較されたし。
------------------------------------------------------------
語るに落ちた英外相の戦争リンク否定で英世論の実情判明
http://www.asyura2.com/0505/war72/msg/359.html
投稿者 木村愛二 日時 2005 年 7 月 19 日 11:49:16: CjMHiEP28ibKM
語るに落ちた英外相の戦争リンク否定で英世論の実情判明
ロンドン爆破事件で、イギリスの識者は、アメリカの戦争に相乗りしていることを、基本的な原因として指摘している。
私は、このイギリスの世論の報道に関して、以下の投稿をした。
------------------------------------------------------------
NHKスペシャル「狙われたロンドン」仕方なく視聴し慨嘆久しいが部分的には興味深し
http://www.asyura2.com/0505/war72/msg/308.html
投稿者 木村愛二 日時 2005 年 7 月 17 日 22:28:45: CjMHiEP28ibKM
受信料は一度も払ったことはないが、どういうわけか、自宅の超安物受像器で視聴できるので、さきほど、午後9時からのNHKスペシャル「狙われたロンドン」を、仕方なく視聴した。
基本的には、イスラム、アラブ、テロリスト、ビン・ラディン、などなど、イギリス政府の言い分そのままで、慨嘆久しいが、部分的には興味深い点もあった。
これは、911の時のアメリカの世論にもあったのだが、基本的な条件は、イスラム教徒が、差別されている構造に問題がある。
その点を、いかにもNHKらしく、現地の「イスラム人権擁護委員会」代表などに語らせていた。
思想は現状の反映であるが、ブレアは、「悪の思想」を糾弾するのみで、大英帝国の世界支配、植民地収奪の歴史の反省をしない。
「悪循環」を指摘する論者もいた。こういう点を、もっと深く追求するのなら、受信料を払わないでもない。
------------------------------------------------------------
以下は、ガーデイアンの記事である。
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1531005,00.html
Straw rejects war link to bombings
James Sturcke and agencies
Monday July 18, 2005
The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, today dismissed suggestions that Britain's involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to the terrorist attacks in London on July 7.
Mr Straw rejected a report by a respected independent thinktank on foreign affairs, the Chatham House organisation, which found that a key problem in the UK for preventing terrorism is that the country "is riding as a pillion passenger with the United States in the war against terror".
12.30pm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Straw rejects war link to bombings
James Sturcke and agencies
Monday July 18, 2005
The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, today dismissed suggestions that Britain's involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to the terrorist attacks in London on July 7.
Mr Straw rejected a report by a respected independent thinktank on foreign affairs, the Chatham House organisation, which found that a key problem in the UK for preventing terrorism is that the country "is riding as a pillion passenger with the United States in the war against terror".
Article continues
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm astonished that Chatham House is now saying that we should not have stood shoulder to shoulder with our long-standing allies in the United States," Mr Straw told reporters before chairing an EU foreign ministers meeting in Brussels.
"The time for excuses for terrorism is over," he said. "The terrorists have struck across the world, in countries allied with the United States, backing the war in Iraq and in countries which had nothing whatever to do with the war in Iraq."
Chatham House and another think-tank, the Economic and Social Research Council, said the situation in Iraq had given "a boost" to the al-Qaida network's ability to recruit and raise money.
Mr Straw said Saturday's attack at a beach resort in Turkey also showed that terrorists "will seek any excuse" to strike. "They struck this weekend in Turkey, which was not supporting our action in Iraq," Mr Straw said.
The Chatham House report, written by Frank Gregory, of the University of Southampton, and Professor Paul Wilkinson, of the University of St Andrews, said: "There is no doubt that the situation over Iraq has imposed particular difficulties for the UK, and for the wider coalition against terrorism."
They added: "The UK is at particular risk because it is the closest ally of the United States."
Their findings contradict the prime minister, Tony Blair, who insisted on Saturday that the fanatics who struck in London and launched other attacks around the world were driven by an "evil ideology" rather than opposition to any policy, and that it would be a "misunderstanding of a catastrophic order" to think that if we changed our behaviour they would change theirs.
The defence secretary, John Reid, also dismissed the argument that Britain would have been safer if it had not joined the military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
"The idea that somehow by running away from the school bully, then the bully will not come after you is a thesis that is known to be completely untrue by every kid in the playground and it is also refuted by every piece of historical evidence that we have," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
Meanwhile, the government today prepared to speed up its anti-terrorist legislation. The home secretary, Charles Clarke, was meeting his Tory and Liberal Democrat counterparts to win support for new terror laws. Mr Clarke, David Davis and Mark Oaten will discuss new offences of preparing, training for and inciting terror acts.
The new offences had not been expected to come into force until next year, but they could be brought forward in the wake of the bombings.
[後略]
------------------------------------------------------------
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。