| ★阿修羅♪ > 戦争72 > 145.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
| Tweet |
この従業員は下記の重大な証言をしている。インサイダーでなければ分からない貴重な情報だ。
1. 地下鉄爆破の一報後ルート変更をしたのがこのNo.30のバス1台だけであったこと。
（何が何でもタビストック街で爆破する必要があったのだろう）
2. バスのCCTVは毎週2・3回メンテナンスされており、去年の7月から作動していなかったとの報道は真っ赤なウソだと断言している。
3. 爆破事件の前の週の土曜日に普段と違う業者が来て20時間もかけてバスのCCTVの検査をしていった。爆破されたバスのCCTVを作動不能にすることが目的だったか、もしや爆薬を仕掛けてたのか？
911の時より真相暴露のペースがぐっと早いようだ。この分だと全部がばれるのも時間の問題かな？
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/150705busbombing.htm
London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach, the company responsible for the majority of London buses.
Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site of the bus bombing last Thursday.
The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.
The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. this is done by a private contractor....So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working? Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.
Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker? Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。