| ★阿修羅♪ > ホロコースト2 > 124.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
| Tweet |
以前、下記で
http;//www.asyura2.com/0311/war45/msg/310.html
イスラエル商品、製品の不買運動が紹介されていました（Israel Boycott)
Gardien紙によれば、大学の世界でもIsrael Boycottが提起されているようです。特に5月26日に
Association of University Teacher (AUT) in London でこれが論議されるとのこと。
以下に、たまたま私が 自分のスペスにコピペしていたものを紹介します（時間の順になっていません）。
ーーーーー 以下 私の コピペより＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
http://www.researchfortnight.co.uk/news.cfm?pagename=newsStory&type=default&elementID=50807
●US academy calls on AUT to reconsider Israeli universities boycott
http://www.researchfortnight.co.uk/news.cfm?pagename=newsStory&type=default&elementID=50690
●Second time round for boycott debate
As the Association of University Teachers prepares to reopen its debate on a
boycott of Israeli universities, Polly Curtis looks at the politics behind
the move
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/worldwide/story/0,9959,1477176,00.html
●Lecturers to reopen debate on Israeli boycott
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/worldwide/story/0,9959,1476414,00.html
（０）Israel boycott row hits college
University attacked for 'anti-Israel' conference
Polly Curtis
Saturday December 4, 2004
The Guardian
London University School of Oriental and African Studies has come under fire for agreeing to host a conference tomorrow at which academics begin a campaign to break links with Israeli universities, significantly increasing an academic boycott of Israel.
Jewish groups accuse the organisers, the school's Palestinian Society, of inciting hatred by calling the conference Resisting Israeli Apartheid: Strategies and Principles.
The Jewish Society has also lodged a complaint with the school about its decision to allow the poet and academic Tom Paulin to deliver a keynote address.
Paulin was criticised in 2002 when he was quoted in the Arab newspaper Al-Ahram Weekly as saying that Jewish settlers "should be shot dead". He later claimed that he had been misquoted.
The speakers at the conference include Professors Steven and Hilary Rose, who began the call for an academic boycott of Israel more than two years ago in a letter to the Guardian, and the linguist Mona Baker, who was the subject of an official inquiry by the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology after she sacked two Israeli members of a journal she edited.
Gavin Gross, of the school's Jewish Society, said: "I see this conference as an out-and-out hate conference which is solely there to delegitimise Israel and its people. It makes no pretence of balance.
"Soas has a reputation for being the centre of political extremism. In the past this has only meant the vilification of Israel; there's no attempt at all to achieve an understanding of the conflict."
Danny Stone, of the Union of Jewish Students, which is organising a counter-meeting at Soas tomorrow, said he had attended a meeting with the university to ask for extra security to ensure the safety of Jewish students on campus.
But one of the conference organisers, Awad Joumaa, a coordinator of the Palestinian Society, said: "We are promoting peace and equality for the Palestinian people.
"We are not the ones inciting hatred here. We are the ones under attack. If having an academic conference is inciting hatred, I don't know what their definition of it is."
Nur Masalha, a philosopher from St Mary's College in Twickenham who has helped to organise speakers for the event, added: "The academic boycott is a peaceful way of trying to make a difference and influence things.
"We believe that unless we do it nothing will happen. People were quite happy to boycott South Africa. Why not Israel?"
The school released a statement distancing itself from the conference.
Colin Bundy, the director of Soas, said he had received a "substantial" volume of email objecting to the decision to host the conference.
"One of the things that has upset me is that Soas has been accused of being institutionally biased, that we're anti-Israel or pro-Arab.
'In fact we probably do more on the Middle East than any other university."
He added that they were making "appropriate preparation" to ensure a peaceful event, but refused to discuss what this would involve.
The conference will mark the launch of a new boycott organisation, the British Committee for Universities in Palestine.
Hilary Rose, who is coordinating the campaign, said that it marked a substantial escalation of the boycott movement.
"We want people to think about the depth of the moral challenge of the boycott. It's not an easy matter for any academic to do this, it's a measure of our despair at our government's inability to take the situation seriously and work for a just peace."
The committee has drawn up a manifesto calling on academics to break links with Israel by refusing to work with Israeli institutions, referee academic papers, grant applications or attend conferences.
But it promises to support Israelis "working with Palestinian colleagues in their demand for self-determination and academic freedom".
（１）Second time round for boycott debate
As the Association of University Teachers prepares to reopen its debate on a boycott of Israeli universities, Polly Curtis looks at the politics behind the move
Thursday May 5, 2005
Hindsight is a precious thing, and something that members of the Association of University Teachers have been granted. Last night the union announced that an emergency conference would be held on May 26 to reopen the debate about the boycott of two Israeli universities.
The union voted to boycott Bar Ilans and Haifa universities at its annual conference in Eastbourne two weeks ago, putting it in the eye of an international storm.
This time round, though, when the issue is debated every member of the AUT's council will know exactly how strong international opinion is against the boycott. Despite a solid support base in favour of the boycott, the union has been under sustained attacked for the decision.
Within the union there will be some intense soul searching before the new debate. The international attention on the debate has woken up lay members, who are already lobbying their delegates to the new conference. Meetings are being arranged to ensure that when it comes to this vote, the decision will be representative of the membership. It will also open the floodgates to a new round of lobbying from outside the union, in the form of letters, emails and faxes, which members reported last time.
At Open University, the membership is split. While some members proposed and seconded the original boycott motions at the conference two weeks ago, others were responsible for collecting the signatures of the 25 council members that were needed to call the emergency conference.
Jon Pike, who led the calls for the new conference, said: "I'll be arguing at a meeting of my local association that we should not boycott Israeli universities. I hope to persuade them of that. We shall have a proper debate.
"Now that members recognise the significance and importance of the proposals to boycott Israeli universities many will attend discussions at their local associations and ensure that a sensible policy that is representative of the members is submitted to the special council. But it's all up for debate and the outcome of the special council is not certain."
The process for May 26 is clear: The 200-odd council members who were present at the annual conference in Eastbourne are invited to convene in central London for one day only. The only subject on the agenda will be Israel and the Middle East. Prior to that members will propose motions to be debated and will then get a chance to amend the motions of others.
Tactical games over the contents of those motions will be rife. In the original vote, five motions were proposed. One was a call for the circulation of information about a Palestinian call for a boycott - this was always likely to be passed, and was, and was designed to be a minor victory for the pro-boycott lobby had all the other motions failed.
Then there were the boycotts of three universities, which the prime mover behind them, Sue Blackwell of Birmingham University, had crafted in a bid to give concrete examples of the universities' complicity in the "occupation". The leadership wanted to defer the vote until more evidence to back these accusations had been collected. However, members chose to debate and vote on the cases of Bar Ilan and Haifa universities immediately, albeit by tiny majorities.
In those two cases, members then voted for the boycott by a wide enough margin not to require a count.
When it came to the Hebrew University in Jerusalem they accepted the leadership's call to defer on the basis that the facts of the university's alleged land grabbing were seriously contested.
A fifth motion, proposed by the executive, was seen as a sop to knock the others off track. It welcomed the recent efforts towards peace, opposed "any barriers to peace" and proposed building bridges with the Israeli Higher Education Union. This was carried, but only after an amendment removed the references to the union, which Ms Blackwell demonstrated didn't actually exist.
The riddles of the new amendments that will emerge over the coming weeks are likely to be as thick with plotting as those already debated.
But the new conference could, despite reopening the controversial debate, dig the AUT out of a hole. Some of the harshest criticisms surrounding the boycott have been directed at how the debate was organised in Eastbourne.
The debate was between the proposers from Birmingham and the Open universities (who gave powerful and emotional performances) and the executive, which was either arguing for referral or against amendments. As time ran out, the chairwoman of the conference proposed moving straight to vote, or risk the debate ending without resolution. Delegates voted with her, and the debate didn't go on to the conference floor.
Those against the boycott have repeatedly pointed this out as the biggest failure of the AUT. The pained expressions on the faces of many delegates as they went into the debate reflected that many were waiting for the debate to make their final decision. They didn't get that chance, say the anti-boycott campaigners.
Meanwhile, the Israeli lobby make frequent reference to the fact that the debate was held on the eve of the Jewish festival of Passover, when many who might have been there to lobby members prior to the vote were caught up in preparations.
The new conference will be on a Thursday. Turnout is expected to be high - not least from the international press who are expected to cover the event. But it will, at least, give academics a chance to do what they do best: Have a very thorough debate on the issue.
（２）Lecturers to reopen debate on Israeli boycott
Polly Curtis, education correspondent
Wednesday May 4, 2005
The Association of University Teachers today announced it is to hold a one-off emergency conference to debate the academic boycott of Israeli universities following intense lobbying from lecturers attempting to overturn the policy.
Union bosses received a petition signed by nearly 30 members of the AUT's council calling for the conference, which would discuss motions ruling out the boycott. Twenty five signatures were needed to trigger the conference.
The conference will take place in London on Thursday May 26.
The AUT's decision last month to boycott two Israeli universities led to a massive backlash against the union from Jewish groups around the world, and many of its own members.
The man behind the anti-boycott campaign, Jon Pike, a philosopher at the Open University, told EducationGuardian.co.uk: "AUT members should be very concerned not only about the decision to boycott Israeli universities, but also about the way in which it was taken. We're trying to overturn that decision."
Each signatory agreed to the statement: "As members of the council of the Association of University Teachers we request a special meeting of the council of the AUT under rule 10.3.1 in order to have a full debate on proposals to boycott Israeli universities."
Academic boycott of Israel
25.04.2005: Legal warnings over Israeli boycott
25.04.2005: Union losing members over Israeli boycott
22.04.2005: Lecturers vote for Israeli boycott
22.04.2005: Lecturer defends Israeli boycott plan on eve of vote
17.04.2005: Boycott threat to Israeli colleges
04.12.2004: Israel boycott row hits college
Israeli and Palestinian universities
30.09.2003: Degree of separation
30.07.2002: Academics appeal for West Bank education rights
12.07.2002: Palestinian university building closed by Israelis
Comment
20.04.2005: Leader: Universities and Israel
20.04.2005: The sins of the few
01.10.2002: Web warfare
06.08.2002: Time for a rethink
Letters
20.04.2005: To boldly go
20.04.2005: Ignoring the log in your own eye
20.04.2005: Why we ask for a boycott
19.04.2005: Boycotting Israeli academics
Talk about it
Have your say on the academic boycott
http://www.asyura2.com/0311/war45/msg/310.html
http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-israel.html
BOYCOTT ISRAEL CAMPAIGN
People of good conscience have chosen to boycott israeli products and companies supporting the zionist entity. Their ethical purchasing decision however is frustrated by the lack of accurate information as to which companies to boycott.
We have carried out extensive research to identify the guilty companies. All our findings are provided here. Where ever possible, we have included full references for the source of our information so that you may independently verify its accuracy and understand exactly how each company is contributing its support to israel. We thank all those organizations who's research we have utilized.
Our research is on going and we encourage you to help us with it - If you have any information regarding guilty companies please e-mail us this information with source references to boycott@inminds.co.uk or use the comments box below. Thank you.
Boycotting Israeli academics
Tuesday April 19, 2005
The Guardian
Academic collaboration and exchange should stand above and beyond politics, and should serve as a vehicle for creating connections that politicians have a difficult time making. Academia offers opportunities to break down barriers and to educate towards peace and coexistence. We can vouch for the maxim that academic channels can strengthen empathy and dialogue, as well as successfully confront stereotypes, not reinforce them as a one-sided boycott - as proposed at the AUT today - inevitably does.
Through continued collaborations in science, technology, health, education, human rights and myriad other fields, the academic community has the ability to build strong bridges of understanding between cultures. Such interactions have already contributed to the reduction of tensions and advancement of cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians by developing joint grassroots projects and academic ventures.
Neither party in this tragic dispute has a monopoly on suffering or injustice. We, as academics, must continue to support the prospects of peace by building bridges through dialogue and mutual understanding with both sides. At a time when Israelis and Palestinians are hopefully entering a new era of reconciliation and trust, a boycott of one side would push back the prospect of peace.
Prof David Abulafia
Cambrdige University
Dr Rachel Airley
John Moores University
Geoffrey Alderman
Dr Eldad Avital
University of London
Dr Dieter Balkenborg
University of Exeter
Les Bash
Dr Jeremy Baum
Imperial College London
Prof John Birds
University of Sheffield
Walter Bodmer
Hertford College
Prof Gabrielle Brenner
Lorna Burns
Barnet College
Prof Brian Burrows
Staffordshire University
David Cesarani
Benjamin Chain
University College London
Dr Naomi Chayen
Imperial College London
Dr Alan Cohen
Cardiff University
Rhonda Cohen
Prof Lloyd Cohen
George Mason University
Prof James Davidson
University of Exeter
Stevie Dee
Stephanie Dee
Harrow FE College
Ruth Deech
Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher education
Dr Estelle Doctor
Prof Dwek
Oxford
Prof Dave Edgar
City University
Dr Tamara Eisenschitz
City University
Rebecca Eliahoo
Harrow
Alan Fersht
Cambridge University
Prof Rajmil Fischman
Keele University
Ronnie Fraser
Professor Mark Geller
UCL
Susan Greenfield
Oxford
Prof Ashley Grossman
St Bartholmew Hospital
Dr Rosalind Herman
LCS
Prof Catherine Hezser
Trinity College, Dublin
Dr Daniel Hochhauser
Royal Free and University College
David Ish-Horowicz
Professor Ruth Itzhaki
University of Manchester
Dr Shaul Itzhaki
Dr Gordon Jayson
Christie Hopsital
Dr Clive Jones
University of Leeds
Dr Howard Kahn
Heriot-Watt University
Todd Kaplan
University of Exeter
Prof Efraim Karsh
Kings College London
Prof David Katz
UCL
Dr Edward Kessler
St Edmund's College
Sascha Khakshouri
UCL
Prof Edward Kissin
London Metropolitan University
Rosalind Landy
Cambridge University
Dr Jonathan Lederman
UCL
Anthony H Lesser
University of Manchester
Prof Oren Levin-Waldman
Metrolpolitan College, NY
Dr Virgilio Lew
Cambridge University
Dr Naftali Loewenthal
UCL
Doctor Louis Lyons
Oxford
Prof Peter Maitlis
University of Sheffield
John Maloney
University of Exeter
Dr Rory Miller
Kings College
Prof Stephen Miller
City University
Dr Jennifer Mindell
Imperial College London
Claus Moser
Yaakov Naparstek
Hadassah University
Dr Paul Nathan
Dr Martin Navias
Kings College
Prof Stephen, Neidle
University of London
Aubrey Newman
University of Leicester
Pauline Newman
Prof John Parr
University of Glasgow
Prof Mark Peeps
UCL
Dr Benny Peiser
John Moores University
Lois Peltz
Prof Michael Pepper
Cambridge University
Daniel Pomeranz Krummel
Cambridge University
Prof Andrew Pomiankowski
UCL
Tessa Rajak
University of Reading
Harry Rajak
University of Sussex
Dr Jeremy Rees
Professor Stefan Reif
University of Cambridge
Bryan Reuben
South Bank University
Prof David-Hillel Ruben
University of London
Prof Gordon Rustin
Dr Mike Schachter
Imperial College London
Gail Seal
President JNF
Denise Sheer
Ian K Smith
City University
Dr David Stone
Mike Stratton
Prof Jennifer Temkin
University of Sussex
Myra Waiman
Ruth Waxman
George Weiss
Imperial College London
Prof Keith Wilson
Prof Robert Winston
Imperial College London
Michael Yudkin
Jacqui Zinkin
University of Westminster
We oppose Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and we support the right of the Palestinian people to an independent state alongside Israel. We think, however, that proposals by some members of the Association of University Teachers for a boycott of Israeli academia would be counterproductive.
The campaign for the academic boycott treats all academics as though they were responsible for government policy - which they are not. The latest proposal contains a clause which is intended to get round this problem by excluding from the boycott "conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals opposed to their state's colonial and racist policies". This would mean that Israeli academics would first have to affirm their "anti-Zionist" credentials before being allowed to function as members of the global academic community.
But there is no agreed definition Zionism. Some people define it as a form of racism. Others understand it as a Jewish national liberation movement. Others consider themselves Zionists if they support the right of Israel not to be conquered.
We oppose the proposal that academics should be subjected a political test. Does anybody suggest that US physicists should be excluded from the academic community if they do not repudiate Guantanamo Bay? Does anybody suggest that Muslim mathematicians should be excluded unless they publicly repudiate the attacks of September 11? Such demands would destroy the principles of openness, free speech and community that should define academia. The current proposal to make a distinction between good Israelis and bad Israelis is a tactical move: the boycott campaign really wants a total boycott of Israeli academia. Last year there was a call by the religious right in Israel to boycott Israeli academics who had signed a statement in support of Israeli pilots who were refusing to bomb targets in the occupied territories. A government minister spoke in favour of a ban on the books of these academics. How would we support Israeli academics that come under such attacks, if there is a boycott on links with Israeli academia?
Who should be teaching Israeli students? Do we demand that Israeli academics that are against the occupation should leave Israel and teach somewhere else? Do we demand that Arab students who are studying at Israeli universities should leave, rather than fight for equal rights?
We should be making more links, not fewer, with the Israeli academics who are doing good work and who are resisting the racist culture of the Israeli right. Formally, this question is dealt with by the good Israeli / bad Israeli formulation of the latest proposal, but this would create more problems than it addresses. A boycott would put UK Jewish academics under pressure to declare themselves "anti-Zionist". And what will happen to those who refuse?
Alan Carling
Bradford University (retired)
Alan Johnson
EdgeHill College of Higher Education
Alex Fradera
University College London
Alice Bloch
City University, London
Prof Allison Assiter
University of the West of England
Prof Anne Showstack Sassoon
Birkbeck, Universityof London
Anne Summers
London Metropolitan University
Prof Avrom Sherr
Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London
Ben Gidley
Goldsmiths College, London
Prof Bencie Woll
City University, London
Brad Baxter
Birkbeck College, London
Camila Bassi
Sheffield Hallam University
Carol Jones
Open University in Wales
Caroline Knowles
Goldsmiths College, London
Caroline New
Bath Spa University College
Catherine Dodds
University of Portsmouth
Charles Asher Small
Yale University
Charles Turner
Warwick University
Chris Rumford
Royal Holloway, London
Colin Shindler
SOAS, University of London
Daniel Chernilo
University Alberto Hurtado, Chile
Prof Dave Edgar
City University, London
Prof David Cesarani
Royal Holloway, London
David Hirsh
Goldsmiths College, London
David Lawrence
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
David Seymour
Lancaster University
Prof Donna Robinson Divine
Smith College
Elena Katz
University College London
Emma Clavering
Newcastle University
Esther Dermott
University of Bristol
Farrell Brody
Hocking College (retired)
Federico Caprotti
University of Leicester
Prof Fred Sack
Ohio State University
Gideon Calder
University of Wales, Newport
Gunther Dietz
Universidad de Granada
Prof Ian Gordon
London School of Economics
Helen Beer
University College London
Prof Howard Tumber
City University, London
Jane Liddell-King
Cambridge University
Jayne Kavanagh
University College, London
Jeffrey Boss
Bristol University (retired)
Jeffrey Ketland
University of Edinburgh
Jennifer Bizley
Oxford University
Prof Joe Pearlman
London Metropolitan University
Prof John Solomos
City University, London
John Vail
University of Newcastle
Jon Pike
Open University
Jonathan Derbyshire
Anglia Polytechnic University
Jonathan Tritter
Warwick University
Josh Cohen
Goldsmiths College, London
Keith Kahn-Harris
Open University
Krisztina Robert
Roehampton University
Larch Juckes Maxey
University of Wales, Swansea
Prof Les Back
Goldsmiths College, London
Lily Kahn
University College London
Liza Schuster
Oxford University
Mario Di Paolantonio
Goldsmiths College, London
Mark Levene
University of Southampton
Matthew S Weinert
University of Denver
Max Farrar
Leeds Metropolitan University
Prof Michael Freeman
University College London
Prof Michael Storper
London School of Economics
Mira Vogel
Goldsmiths College, London
Prof Miriam E David
Institute of Education, London
Mohammed Ilyas
Goldsmiths College, London
Monica Greco
Goldsmiths College, London
Naomi Fulop
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Naomi Miller
Institute of Cancer Research, London
Prof Norman Freeman
Bristol University
Paul Filmer
Goldsmiths College, London
Pauline Allen
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Prof Peter Jones
University of Newcastle
Peter Lawson
Open University
Peter Mellor
City University, London
Prof Randall Hansen
Newcastle University
Ray Kiely
SOAS, University of London
Prof Robert Fine
Warwick University
Robert Jones
City University, London
Robin Humphrey
University of Newcastle
Ross M Goodman
University of West Florida
Prof Ruth Levitas
University of Bristol
Saulo B Cwerner
Goldsmiths College, London
Prof Sealy Gilles
Long Island University
Sonja Grussendorf
Goldsmiths College, London
Prof Stephan Feuchtwang
London School of Economics
Prof Stephen Miller
City University, London
Prof Steven Haberman
City University
Tamar Drukker
SOAS, University of London
Tsila Ratner
University College, London
Prof Tudor Parfitt
SOAS, University of London
Yasmeen Narayan
Goldsmiths College, London
Zoe Waxman
Oxford University
The Faculty for Israeli-Palestinian Peace has built links with critical Israeli and Palestinian academics, and Jewish and non-Jewish academics in Europe and the US, all committed to seeing an end to Israel's long and brutal occupation. The violations of academic freedom in Palestine are ongoing and profound: including harassment of staff and students at checkpoints; denial of the right to travel; and expulsion of Bir Zeit students to Gaza thus terminating their studies.
Many Palestinian academics have called for a boycott of Israeli academia. We do not oppose a boycott in principle, but feel it demands strategic evaluation: will it achieve its desired goals or might it hinder attempts to build support for fundamental Palestinian rights? Not surprisingly, there are differing responses. The key issue is not to be diverted from other activities that most of those who seek to end the occupation support.
We need professional associations of academics, in Israel and internationally, to take a stand against the occupation and to issue guidelines regarding the use of academic connections to promote the end of Israeli occupation. We hope such interventions will promote awareness of and resistance to Israeli infringements of human and civil rights.
British academics should think carefully before developing research links and exchanges with Israelis: ascertaining whether they are part of the military machine or work to sustain the occupation; whether they are prepared to address and criticise infringements of Palestinian rights and willing/able to work with Palestinians. We see no reason for Israel to be granted special privileges within the EU research funding regime or to be treated as a European country in any scientific programmes. We need to develop a large programme of assistance for Palestinian institutions of higher education among international academics, involving exchanges, sharing of research and research materials etc. We must condemn the disgraceful establishment of the College of Judea and Samaria in the West Bank as a part of the machinery of Israeli occupation; or the confiscation of land in East Jerusalem to extend the Hebrew University's student dorms. We call on international academics visiting Israeli institutions of higher education, and Israeli academics visiting foreign institutions, to make clear their objection to the continued Israeli occupation. The situation in Israel-Palestine is not normal. Israeli academia has to account for its role in this situation.
Prof Lynne Segal
Prof Irene Bruegel
Richard Kuper
Prof Eric Hobsbawm
Prof Jacqueline Rose (Member of FFIPP-I Board)
Faculty for Israeli-Palestinian Peace - International.
www.ffipp.org
Dr Anthony Bale
Birkbeck College, London
Dr Jonathan Bindman
King's College, London
Dr Oya Biringen-Akman
Birkbeck College, London
Jude Bloomfield
University of East London
Prof Laurel Brake
Birkbeck College, London
Dr Belinda Brooks-Gordon
Birkbeck College, London
Dr Eric Brunner
University College London
Dr Rosie Campbell
Birkbeck College, London
Dr Bob Cant
London South Bank University
Prof Paul Cheshire
London School of Economics
Prof Laura Chrisman
York
Hilary Claire
London Metropolitan University
Michael Cushman
London School of Economics
Prof Miriam David
Keele University
Dr Mehmet-Ali Dikerdem
Middlesex University
Prof Naomi Eilan
Warwick University
Prof Debbie Epstein
Cardiff
Dr Rayah Feldman
London South Bank University
John Fletcher
Warwick University
Prof Andrew Gibson
Royal Holloway, London
Uri Gordon
Oxford
Prof Ruth Heilbronn
Institute of Education, London
Dr Ken Hirschkop
Manchester University
Prof Wendy Hollway
Open University
Prof Jennifer Hornsby
Birkbeck College, London
Prof David Howard
University of Newcastle
Dr Susie Jacobs
Manchester Metropolitan University
Dr Mike Jones
University of Liverpool
Robert Jones
Emeritus fellow, City University
Anisa de Jong
AHRC Research Centre, Kent University
Prof Ahuvia Kahane
Royal Holloway, London
Prof Deniz Kandiyoti
School of Oriental and African Studies
Prof Cora Kaplan
Southampton University
Dr Alexandra M Kokoli
University of Sussex
Prof Eleanor Kofman
Middlesex University
Michael Kustow
Royal Holloway, London
Prof Ailsa Land
Emeritus professor, LSE
Prof Frank Land
Emeritus professor, LSE
Prof Neil Lazarus
Warwick University
Dr Mark Levene
Centre for Jewish/ non-Jewish Relations, University of Southampton
Dr Teresa Louro
Birkbeck College
Alison Macfarlane
City University
Emma Mawdsley
Birkbeck College, London
Professor Marge Mayo
Goldsmiths College, London
Dr Simon Mohun
Queen Mary and Westfield, London
Prof Mandy Merck
Royal Holloway, London
Prof Jane Miller
London Institute of Education (emeritus)
Dr Daniel Monk
Birkbeck College, London
Prof Peter Osborne
Middlesex University
Dr Carrie Paechter
Goldsmiths College, London
Dr Paulina Palmer
Warwick, University
Prof Benita Parry
Warwick University
Prof William Parry
Warwick University
Prof Felix Pirani
Kings College, London (emeritus)
Prof Sol Picciotto
Lancaster University
Dr Ben Rogaly
Birkbeck, London
Barbara Rosenbaum
University of Southampton
Prof Jonathan Rosenhead
LSE
Prof Kristin Ross
Queen Mary, University of London
Dr Carolyn Roth
City University
Prof Sheila Rowbotham
Manchester University
Dr Jonathan Rutherford
Middlesex University>
Michael Sackin
University of Leicester
Prof Andrew Samuels
Essex University
Dr Esther Saraga
Open University
Professor Anne Sassoon
Birkbeck College, London
Prof Donald Sassoon
Queen Mary, London
Professor Sean Sayer
University of Kent
Prof Janet Sayers
Canterbury University
Dr Roger Seifert
Keele University
Dr Lyndsey Stonebridge
University of East Anglia
Dr Bill Schwarz
Queen Mary, London
Prof Richard Sennett
LSE
Prof Tim Shallice
Dr George Shire
Open University
Ben Soffa
President, Graduate Student Association, Lancaster University
Prof Kate Soper
Metropolitan University
Dr Annabelle Sreberny
SOAS, University of London
Dr Lyndsey Stonebridge
University of East Anglia
Dr John Strawson
University of East London
James Swinson
University of the Arts, London
Professor John Tosh
Roehampton University
Dr Rashmi Varma
University of Warwick
Prof Couze Venn
Nottingham University
Dr Margot Waddell
Tavistock Clinic
Dr Tom Wengraf
University of East London
Aaron Winter
University of Sussex
Prof Nira Yuval-Davis
University of East London
Prof Sami Zubaida
Birkbeck, London
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。