現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争62 > 303.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
Tweet |
(回答先: ファルージャからのメッセージ 投稿者 ただただ平和に向かって行動するもの 日時 2004 年 11 月 03 日 07:10:44)
> CRISIS NEWSLETTER
>
> CONTENTS
> Election Advice, The latest Osama Bin Laden Video, Statement friom the
> People of Fallujah
>
> We are now back on line after nearly completing a book on the 9/11 attacks
> to be published March 2005. Here is a hurried missive...
>
> ADVICE TO OUR AMERICAN READERS:
> Vote Kerry, but only in the swing states. Otherwise vote for the Greens or
> for Nader. Kerry is not necessarily better, but he's more constrained by
> his
> supporters than Bush. In addition, if Bush loses, his power to silence
> federal employees is gone, which may enable the truth about 9/11 and the
> bogus `war on terror` to come out.
>
> If Kerry wins, don't wait till January to start fighting for a withdrawal
> from Iraq. Kerry's policy, a successful internationalisation of the
> Bush/Blair war would be a disaster. The 1991 attack on Iraq was far more
> murderous than the 2003 attack. The reason: `international support`
> permitted worse crimes than US/UK dare to do on their own.
>
> BIN LADEN EMERGES FROM TIME WARP
>
> The BBC was certainly right in its choice of the word "spectral" to
> describe
> the latest Osamam Bin Laden video. What are we to make of a video released
> three days before the US election apparently produced by a man who many
> thought dead?
>
> For the suspicious (who often turn out to be right when it comes to the US
> government) the video could easily be a fraud. The only hard evidence the
> world has seen is a fuzzy picture of someone who looks very much like OBL
> talking in a voice which the CIA says is his voice. Nowadays there are
> machines which, given a recording of someone's voice, will generate a new
> message in the same voice. Some 9/11 sceptics suggest the famous mobile
> phone calls (generally impossible from over 7,000 feet) were generated in
> this way.
>
> Suppose the video is genuine. The real Bin Laden was probably suffering
> from
> kidney disease. He certainly aged dramatically between 1996 and 2001 even
> though he had access to medical help. The current Bin Laden is as fit or
> fitter than he was three years ago, certainly not on the run in the wild
> Pakistani tribal areas. Somebody is sheltering him. Who might that be?
>
> There are three Osama Bin Ladens a. The lean looking Islamic militant who
> denounced the 9/11 attacks in the Pakistani media as the unislamic killing
> of women and children. b. The fat OBL interviewed by the Pakistani
> newspaper
> The Dawn in November 2001 (and also an appearance on the November 2001
> video
> the CIA used to claim proof of his involvement in 9/11). c. Now thin
> again,
> the `original` OBL claiming responsibility for 9/11.
>
> If they are same person, OBL is a cynical political manipulator, telling
> one
> thing to the Islamic community (he was not responsible for 9/11) and
> another
> to the West (he was responsible), a man without kidney disease, rambling
> in
> a narcissistic way about his youth, a sort of media celebrity. In other
> words not an Islamic militant at all, a fraud. Who might a fraud like this
> be working for?
>
> It seems more likely that the real Bin Laden is dead as claimed in the
> Pakistani and Egyptian press in December 2001.
> http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/funeral/
>
> Whoever wins the election, the neocon Observer (London) was right for
> once:
> the new Bin Laden video is good for Bush. The Democrats have tried to spin
> it as a reminder that Bush failed to capture him, but this only adds fire
> to
> the irrational flames of fear and anger which Bush has used as political
> fuel so successfully since 2001.
>
> Whenever Bush/Blair have been in trouble, an Al Qaida attack has
> materialised, which is why they are known to many as Al-CIA-Duh. The Abu
> Ghraib torture scandal was pushed off the news schedules by the dodgy
> video
> of the supposed Nick Berg beheading (by overweight `Islamic militants`,
> one
> wearing a gold ring). The run-up to the Iraq war was accompanied by a
> `terrorist threat` requiring troop deployments at Heathrow. The recent
> transfer of UK troops to Baghdad was eclipsed by the kidnapping of
> Margaret
> Hassan.
>
> STATEMENT FROM FALLUJAH
>
> Meanwhile in Iraq there are two wars. In the real war Iraqis with
> international law on their side are conducting a classic colonial
> liberation
> war against US killers in helicopter gunships.
>
> But our controlled media work in the Green Zone next to the Iraqi puppets.
> For them the war in Iraq is being waged by the sinister villain Abu Musab
> al-Zarqawi, while US/UK troops bravely try to introduce slow witted Iraqi
> peasants to democracy. This is what the people of Fallujah have to say
> about
> al-Zarqawi:
>
> (Quote)
> We know that we live in a world of double standards. In Fallujah the US
> has
> created a new and shadowy target-Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Al-Zarqawi is a
> new
> excuse to justify the US's criminal actions. A year has passed since this
> new excuse was dreamed up, and every time they attack homes, mosques and
> restaurants, killing women and children, they say, "We have launched a
> successful operation against al-Zarqawi." They will never say they have
> killed him, because he does not exist.
>
> The people of Fallujah assure you that this person is not in the city,
> nor
> probably anywhere else in Iraq. Many times the people of Fallujah have
> asked that if anyone sees al-Zarqawi they should kill him. We know now
> that
> he is
> nothing but a phantom created by the US.
> (Quote ends, remainder at end)
>
> For more on al-Zarqawi
>
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2004%20opinions/October/24o/
> Is%20Zarqawi%20Another%20Black-Op%20By%20John%20Doraemi.htm
> or go to http://www.aljazeerah.info and scroll down to 25.10.204
>
> If al-Zarqawi is not for real, who then carried out the bloodiest attacks
> of
> all in Iraq: the well organised murders of hundreds of Shi'ites, in
> attacks
> clearly designed to provoke a civil war there in Spring of this year. The
> genuine Iraqi resistance denied it - they have spent much effort on
> maintaining a common front against US/UK. Here's a clue: it happened after
> the Western media whores chorused warnings of the `danger` of a civil war.
> Here's another clue: when the genuine militant Al Sadr used his newspaper
> to
> denounce Mossad/CIA for these atrocities, the US launched an all-out war
> against him.
>
> Largely unknown to the public, the news media have little more freedom to
> tell the truth here than their equivalents did in the Soviet Union. Since
> the sacking of Greg Dyke (reportedly organised by ex MI5 boss and BBC
> Governor Dame Neville Jones), the sacking of Piers Morgan (after pressure
> from `American investors`) and the introduction of the BBC's `compliance
> unit` everyone in the media knows it.
>
> After the lies on WMD and the lies on 9/11 we now have an even more
> unlikely
> lie: Bush/Blair may have made mistakes but they are sincere and in Iraq to
> help the Iraqi people.
>
> But, as in the Soviet Union, the hints are there if you look out for them,
> words like `spectral`, or the phrase from a US journalist during the
> anthrax
> attacks that it `felt like a B movie`. Walter Cronkite, the ageing doyen
> from a less censored era, told Larry King at the weekend:
>
> In fact, I'm a little inclined to think that Karl Rove, the political
> manager at the White House, who is a very clever man, he probably set up
> bin
> Laden to this thing.
> http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html
>
> The astonishing thing is the low quality of the evidence that Bush/Blair
> and
> the media whores are offering for their legends. Arab speakers say they
> have
> not even bothered to give `al-Zarqawi` a Jordanian accent. The Nick Berg
> `beheading` failed to produce any blood - Berg was clearly already a
> corpse.
> Al-Zarqawi once had one a leg but now has two again.
>
> If Osama Bin Laden and al-Zarqawi ever existed as genuine militants they
> are
> probably now dead, replaced by spectres. Who benefits? The people who want
> to stay in Iraq for ever, who wrecked the Iraqi state as soon as they
> seized
> the country, who cancelled elections in summer 2003 when they went the
> wrong
> way, who are building permanent bases there and fomenting a civil war to
> justify their presence.
>
>
> Here is the full statement from Fallujah:
>
> Received via Bristol Stop the War Coalition:-
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bristol-stop-the-war-coalition/
>
>
> This letter was sent by representatives of the people of Fallujah to the
> UN
> secretary general Kofi Annan
>
> " IT IS more than evident that US forces are committing daily acts of
> genocide in Iraq. As we write, these crimes are being perpetrated against
> the
> city of Fallujah.
>
> US war planes are launching their most powerful bombs against the
> civilian
> population, killing and wounding hundreds of innocent people. Their tanks
> are
> pounding the city with heavy artillery.
>
> As you know, there is no military presence in the city. There have been
> no
> actions by the resistance in Fallujah in the last few weeks because
> negotiations are in progress between representatives of the city and the
> Allawi government.
>
> The new bombardment by the US has begun while the people are fasting
> during
> the celebration of Ramadan. Now many of them are trapped in the ruins of
> their homes and cut off from any outside assistance.
>
> On the night of 13 October a single US bombardment destroyed 50 houses
> and
> their inhabitants. Is this a crime of genocide or a lesson about US
> democracy? The US is committing acts of terror against the people of
> Fallujah
> for only one reason-to force them to accept the occupation.
>
> Your excellency and the whole world know that the US and their allies
> have
> destroyed our country on the pretext of the threat of weapons of mass
> destruction. Now, after their own mass destruction and the killing of
> thousands of civilians, they have admitted that they have not found any.
> But they have said nothing about the crimes they have committed. The
> whole
> world is silent, and even the killing of Iraqi civilians is not
> condemned.
> Will the US be paying compensation, as it made Iraq do after the 1991
> Gulf
> War?
>
> We know that we live in a world of double standards. In Fallujah the US
> has
> created a new and shadowy target-Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Al-Zarqawi is a
> new
> excuse to justify the US's criminal actions. A year has passed since this
> new excuse was dreamed up, and every time they attack homes, mosques and
> restaurants, killing women and children, they say, "We have launched a
> successful operation against al-Zarqawi." They will never say they have
> killed him, because he does not exist.
>
> The people of Fallujah assure you that this person is not in the city,
> nor
> probably anywhere else in Iraq. Many times the people of Fallujah have
> asked
> that if anyone sees al-Zarqawi they should kill him. We know now that he
> is
> nothing but a phantom created by the US.
>
> Our representatives have repeatedly denounced kidnapping and killing of
> civilians. We have nothing to do with any group that acts in an inhumane
> manner. We call on you and the leaders of the world to exert the greatest
> pressure on the Bush administration to end its crimes against Fallujah
> and
> pull its army back from the city.
>
> When they left a while ago, the city had peace and tranquillity. There
> was
> no disorder in the city. The civil administration here functioned well,
> despite the lack of resources. Our "offence" is simply that we did not
> welcome the forces of occupation. This is our right according to UN
> Charter, according to international law and according to the norms of
> humanity.
>
> It is very urgent that you, along with other world leaders, intervene
> immediately to prevent another massacre. We have tried to contact UN
> representatives in Iraq to ask them to do this but, as you know, they are
> sealed off in the maximum security Green Zone in Baghdad and we are not
> allowed access to them. We want the UN to take a stand on the situation
> in Fallujah.
>
> Best wishes, in the name of the people of Fallujah, the shura council of
> Fallujah, the trade union association, the teachers' union, and the
> council
> of tribal leaders "
>
> Kassim Abdullsattar al-Jumaily: President
> The Study Center of Human Rights & Democracy
> On behalf of the people of Fallujah and for:
> Al-Fallujah Shura Council
> The Bar Association
> The Teacher Union
> Council of Tribes Leaders
> The House of Fatwa and Religious Education
>
> (statement ends)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ------------------------------------
> Ian Henshall's generic email signature...
> From Ian Henshall, publisher of Crisis Newsletter, www.dumpblair.co.uk and
> www.911dossier.co.uk. He is also proprietor of The Tea and Coffee Plant
> and
> chair of INK, the trade organisation for the UK alternative print media
> (www.ink.uk.com). Comment is written in a strictly personal capacity. To
> get
> future Crisis Newsletters or be removed, email to
> crisisnewsletter@pro-net.co.uk.
> -----------------------------
> Best News Web Sites, updated daily or hourly
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
> http://www.legitgov.org/
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
> http://english.aljazeera.net/
>
>
> Best Analysis Sites
> http://globalresearch.ca
> http://www.fromthewilderness.com/
> http://www.onlinejournal.com
> http://www.medialens.org/
> http://scoop.co.nz/
> http://www.jihadunspun.net/
>
> the official 911 story continues to crumble, latest news from
> http://www.911skeptics.blogspot.com/
> --------------------------------------------------
>