現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争55 > 397.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
Tweet |
破落戸シオニスト組織が米上院議員ホーリングズを野次り倒した。
本日、2004年5月19日、イギリスの歴史見直し論者から、電子手紙集が届き、その中に、以下に紹介するアメリカの最悪のシオニスト組織、破落戸集団、ADLの電網新聞記事の紹介があった。
イギリスの歴史見直し論者は、この記事の紹介として、次の見出しを付けている。「アメリカ: ADLがs政治家を野次り倒す」である。米上院議員ホーリングズの発言そのものは、この投稿の最後に再録する。
AMERICA: ADL SHOUT DOWN POLITICIAN
木村愛二注:SHOUT DOWN: Example: The speaker was shouted down by a group of protesters.
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/4496_12.htm
Anti-Semitism: USA
ADL Urges Senator Hollings to Disavow Statements on Jews and the Iraq War
New York, NY, May 14, 2004 The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) urged Senator Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) to publicly disavow his statements in a newspaper column suggesting that the war in Iraq was motivated by "President Bush's policy to secure Israel" and advanced by a handful of Jewish officials and opinion leaders.
"Certainly, discussing and questioning policy is the right and duty of all responsible leaders. But when the debate veers into anti-Jewish stereotyping, it is tantamount to scapegoating and an appeal to ethnic hatred," Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, said in a letter to Sen. Hollings. "Regardless of whether one feels that America's war on Iraq was justified, the charge that it is being fought by the U.S. on behalf of Israel grossly misrepresents the legitimate U.S. interests that are involved in the debate.
"This is reminiscent of age-old, anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government," the letter said. "We urge you, as you commence the final session of your three-decade Senate career, to reconsider these comments and reject public debate that invokes stereotypes or intolerance of any kind."
The statements by Sen. Hollings appeared in a column in the Charleston Post and Courier on May 6 and were subsequently entered into the Congressional Record.
The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world's leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.
------------------------------------------------------------
Anti-Defamation League、略称、ADLは、最悪の偽善系「人権派」組織である。反ユダヤ主義の口実で、極右イスラエルの防衛部隊として、アメリカ中を脅しまくっている。
以下の投稿、「2004 年 5 月 08 日」、本日から11日前のわが投稿で紹介したのが、ホーリングズの問題の発言なのである。
これは、アメリカの歴史見直し論者からきた電子手紙集に入っていた。ところが、その時、人名の片仮名表記を、ホリンガーとしてしまった。超多忙中、慌てて間違えていたので、ホーリングズと訂正する。
------------------------------------------------------------
米上院議員ホリンガー(ホーリングズと訂正):ブッシュの中東政策失敗はテロを増やした
http://www.asyura2.com/0403/war54/msg/873.html
投稿者 木村愛二 日時 2004 年 5 月 08 日 01:44:37:CjMHiEP28ibKM
米上院議員ホリンガ(ホーリングズと訂正)ー曰く:ブッシュの中東政策失敗は、テロをさらに創出した。
これは、私と同じく、ホロコーストは嘘と主張するアメリカの歴史見直し論者からの電子手紙による最新情報の転送であり、かなり総合的な批判である。
米上院議員ホリンガーは、イラク戦争によるアメリカ兵の760の死者と、3,000の重症者と、その家族を代弁しているのである。
http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/opinion/2004506A17.html
Contact: Andy Davis, (202) 224-6654
OPINION
Bush's failed Mideast policy is creating more terrorism
By U.S. Senator Ernest F. Hollings
Originally published in the Charleston Post and Courier
May 6, 2004
With 760 dead in Iraq and over 3,000 maimed for life, home folks continue to argue why we are in Iraq -- and how to get out.
Now everyone knows what was not the cause. Even President Bush acknowledges that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. Listing the 45 countries where al-Qaida was operating on September 11 (70 cells in the U.S.), the State Department did not list Iraq. Richard Clarke, in "Against All Enemies," tells how the United States had not received any threat of terrorism for 10 years from Saddam at the time of our invasion.
On Page 231, John McLaughlin of the CIA verifies this to Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. In 1993, President Clinton responded to Saddam's attempt on the life of President George H.W. Bush by putting a missile down on Saddam's intelligence headquarters in Baghdad. Not a big kill, but Saddam got the message -- monkey around with the United States and a missile lands on his head. Of course there were no weapons of mass destruction. Israel's intelligence, Mossad, knows what's going on in Iraq. They are the best. They have to know.
Israel's survival depends on knowing. Israel long since would have taken us to the weapons of mass destruction if there were any or if they had been removed. With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country? The answer: President Bush's policy to secure Israel.
Led by Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Charles Krauthammer, for years there has been a domino school of thought that the way to guarantee Israel's security is to spread democracy in the area. Wolfowitz wrote: "The United States may not be able to lead countries through the door of democracy, but where that door is locked shut by a totalitarian deadbolt, American power may be the only way to open it up." And on another occasion: Iraq as "the first Arab democracy ... would cast a very large shadow, starting with Syria and Iran but across the whole Arab world." Three weeks before the invasion, President Bush stated: "A new regime in Iraq would serve as a dramatic and inspiring example for freedom for other nations in the region."
Every president since 1947 has made a futile attempt to help Israel negotiate peace. But no leadership has surfaced amongst the Palestinians that can make a binding agreement. President Bush realized his chances at negotiation were no better. He came to office imbued with one thought -- re-election. Bush felt tax cuts would hold his crowd together and spreading democracy in the Mideast to secure Israel would take the Jewish vote from the Democrats. You don't come to town and announce your Israel policy is to invade Iraq. But George W. Bush, as stated by former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and others, started laying the groundwork to invade Iraq days after inauguration. And, without any Iraq connection to 9/11, within weeks he had the Pentagon outlining a plan to invade Iraq. He was determined.
President Bush thought taking Iraq would be easy. Wolfowitz said it would take only seven days. Vice President Cheney believed we would be greeted as liberators. But Cheney's man, Chalabi, made a mess of the de-Baathification of Iraq by dismissing Republican Guard leadership and Sunni leaders who soon joined with the insurgents. Worst of all, we tried to secure Iraq with too few troops.
In 1966 in South Vietnam, with a population of 16,543,000, Gen. William C. Westmoreland, with 535,000 U.S. troops was still asking for more. In Iraq with a population of 24,683,000, Gen. John Abizaid with only 135,000 troops can barely secure the troops much less the country. If the troops are there to fight, they are too few. If there to die, they are too many. To secure Iraq we need more troops -- at least 100,000 more. The only way to get the United Nations back in Iraq is to make the country secure. Once back, the French, Germans and others will join with the U.N. to take over.
With President Bush's domino policy in the Mideast gone awry, he keeps shouting, "Terrorism War." Terrorism is a method, not a war. We don't call the Crimean War with the Charge of the Light Brigade the Cavalry War. Or World War II the Blitzkrieg War. There is terrorism in Northern Ireland against the Brits. There is terrorism in India and in Pakistan. In the Mideast, terrorism is a separate problem to be defeated by diplomacy and negotiation, not militarily. Here, might does not make right -- right makes might. Acting militarily, we have created more terrorism than we have eliminated.
------------------------------------------------------------