サダム排除は、戦争の理由にはならない。

ブッシュおよびブレアは、人命を救う為の努力として、今回の戦争を正当化しようとしてはならない。
人道的な介在としてイラクの戦争を正当化することは出来ない。

集団虐殺だけが、人道主義の目的のために軍事力を使用することを許す動機付けになるかもしれない。
だが２００３年３月の時点でサダムはそのような殺戮は行っておらず、上記のような理由で
今回の戦争を正当化することは認められない。

…と大量破壊兵器が出てこなかった時の為の予想される「言い訳」を封じている。

BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3430331.stm

Ousting Saddam 'no cause for war'


The reasons for the war are still being questioned
A leading human rights group has said the US and UK are wrong to use the toppling of a brutal regime in Baghdad to justify going to war against Iraq.
The group, Human Rights Watch asked why George Bush and Tony Blair did not try remove Saddam Hussein much earlier.

Its report comes as the former US chief weapons inspector questioned the CIA's assessment of the threat from Iraq.

Tony Blair is also under pressure, awaiting the findings of an inquiry into the death of a UK weapons expert.

Mr Blair and Mr Bush have come under increasing pressure from critics of the war over their failure to produce convincing evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed banned weapons of mass destruction.

In its annual World Report, the New York-based Human Rights Watch also said:

・Human rights are deteriorating in Afghanistan due to a reliance by US-led 　　　forces on warlords to defeat Taleban and al-Qaeda fighters

・The Bush administration uses threats to national security to justify putting 　executive action in the United States above the law

・Russian authorities justify the war in Chechnya as their contribution to the 　war on terror, while European and other governments ignore appalling human 　　rights abuses there

・There was a "moment of hope" in Africa with African leaders trying to stop 　　regional wars and the associated abuses, through bodies like the African Union

Flawed justification

Human Rights Watch said Mr Bush and Mr Blair should not try to justify the war retrospectively as an effort to save human life.

The Bush administration cannot justify the war in Iraq as a humanitarian intervention, and neither can Tony Blair

Human Rights Watch
"Only mass slaughter might permit the deliberate taking of life in using military force for humanitarian purposes," it said.

"Brutal as Saddam Hussein's reign had been, the scope of the Iraq Government's killing in March 2003, was not of the exceptional and dire magnitude that would justify humanitarian intervention.

"The Bush administration cannot justify the war in Iraq as a humanitarian intervention, and neither can Tony Blair."

In a US radio interview on Monday, the former chief US weapons inspector David Kay cast further doubt on the existence in Iraq of banned weapons of mass destruction.

Mr Kay said he thought the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) owed Mr Bush an explanation for warnings about the threat Iraq posed.

The issue is also stalking Mr Blair, whose political future depends on the findings of a report to be released on Wednesday which will examine claims he exaggerated the threat from Iraq.

　次へ 　前へ

戦争47掲示板へ

フォローアップ:

　

　

　

拍手はせず、拍手一覧を見る

---

★登録無しでコメント可能。今すぐ反映　通常 ｜動画・ツイッター等 ｜htmltag可（熟練者向）
（タグCheck ｜タグに'だけを使っている場合のcheck ｜checkしない）（各説明）

（←ペンネーム新規登録ならチェック）
↓ペンネーム（2023/11/26から必須）

↓パスワード（ペンネームに必須）

（ペンネームとパスワードは初回使用で記録、次回以降にチェック。パスワードはメモすべし。）
↓画像認証
（ 上画像文字を入力）
ルール確認＆失敗対策
画像の URL (任意):

投稿コメント全ログ 　コメント即時配信 　スレ建て依頼 　削除コメント確認方法

---

★阿修羅♪　http://www.asyura2.com/ 　since 1995
　題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
掲示板,ＭＬを含むこのサイトすべての
一切の引用、転載、リンクを許可いたします。確認メールは不要です。
引用元リンクを表示してください。