現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> テスト７ > 145.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> テスト７ > 145.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
| Tweet |
ホモは、汚いやり方で文明を破壊したいんだ！じゃあ、あんたはどうなの？【SteveBellの漫画です。】
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/steve_bell/2004/02/26/bell512.jpg
Homos want to destroy civilisation with their dirty tricks!
ホモは、汚いやり方で文明を破壊したいんだ！
No ! That's our job !!
だめ、それはわれわれにおあつらえの仕事なんだから、、！！
※civilisation 本来のスペルは civilization スペル間違いはいかにもブッシュらしくて雰囲気が出てます。
※ホモを非難しているブッシュ、ズームを引くと、ミサイルで出来た花束を持つブレアが花嫁姿で隣に(^^;
********************************************************************************
今まで主に戦争板で漫画を紹介していましたが、これからはこれはと思う面白そうな漫画はＩＴ板でご紹介していこうと思います。以下理由です。
１、【田中 宇の国際ニュース解説】をご紹介しているのと同趣旨です。国際情勢等への関心のあるなしで、セキュリティ情報への接し方も、理解の深さも全然違ってくると思っています。これは小生の体験から来る実感です。
２、難しそうな技術情報の中での息抜きです。また、漫画をお目当てにＩＴ板を訪問する人が増え、「ついでに難しそうなＩＴ情報をつまみ食いしてくれたら」との考えもあります。
３、これからますますＩＴスキルが重要になります。そう言う知識のある人ほど平和の問題を始めとして社会問題に関心を持って欲しいと感じています。
４、戦争板は流れが速すぎます。今までも随分良い漫画が早すぎた流れで消えていきました。
５、主に【SteveBellの漫画です。】がご紹介の中心になると思います。後ろに英文の関連記事を載せます。インターネットの世界は英語が必須なので英語の勉強の意味合いもあります。出来たら中高校生とかがこのＩＴ板の愛読者となって、ＩＴに強くなり、社会問題にも目覚め、英語にも強くなってくれれば最高です。
********************************************************************************
Bush backs gay wedding ban
Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Wednesday February 25, 2004
The Guardian
George Bush yesterday plunged headlong into America's culture wars, allying himself with the Christian right wing of his Republican party by endorsing a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage, and calling heterosexual marriage "the most fundamental institution of civilisation".
His stance, condemned by Democrats, set him apart from their candidate, John Kerry from Massachusetts, the state whose "activist judges" the president explicitly condemned for allowing gay marriage.
It has become what Americans call a "hot button issue": the fault line between generations, regions and political affiliations; states from New Mexico to Maryland have adopted opposing stands. While in Boston and San Francisco wedding planners court gay and lesbian custom, legislatures in other states are hurriedly forcing through bills to ban such marriages.
In his announcement at the White House, Mr Bush came down firmly on the side of the Christian right, who argue that giving legal sanction to same sex weddings would destroy the institution of marriage. He took sideswipes against the "activist judges" of Massachusetts who legalised same-sex marriage last autumn, and the "defiance" of city officials in San Francisco, who have presided over 3,000 such weddings this month.
"After more than two centuries of American jurisprudence and millennia of human experience, a few judges and local authorities are presuming to change the most fundamental institution of civilisation," Mr Bush said.
He justified his response - the first serious initiative to amend the constitution in 25 years - by saying that existing legislation did not go far enough in shoring up a sacred institution under threat. The federal government passed a Defence of Marriage Act under then president Bill Clinton, and currently 38 states ban same sex unions, with several more exploring the option.
"There is no assurance the act will not itself be struck down by activist courts," Mr Bush said. His statement was cheered by the Christian right, and attacked as ferociously by Democratic party officials and liberal organisations.
Amid the furore, one fact was clear: yesterday was the formal start of Mr Bush's re-election campaign, and he intended to draw a stark contrast between his leadership and that of the Democratic frontrunner, John Kerry, as a stereotypical liberal from Massachusetts.
Anthony Corrado, a fellow in politics at the Brookings Institution, said the announcement was aimed at energising the core Republican constituency of conservative Christian voters, as well as attracting working-class urban Catholics who might otherwise vote Democrat. "It's also an effort to elevate questions about values. The White House feels much more comfortable talking about values and moral questions than they do about the health of the economy."
However, Mr Bush knows full well that his proposal has virtually no chance of seeing daylight - certainly not before the November election. A constitutional amendment needs support of three-quarters of states, as well as two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Mr Bush did not go as far as the original proposers of the constitutional amendment would have liked. He left the door open for civil unions, an arrangement that confers on same sex couples some - but not all - of the benefits of marriage, and is recognised in Vermont.
However, Mark Shields, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a gay civil rights organisation, said: "This was pure political pandering to his far-right base. This is the president trying to jumpstart his election campaign."
However, it is far from clear yesterday just what mileage Mr Bush could expect to gain. Attitudes towards lesbians and gays have changed hugely. In 1997, the comedian Ellen DeGeneres caused a furore when she came out on her TV show; today one of the top-rated programmes is a make-over by five gay men called Queer Eye for the Straight Guy.
Full coverage
US elections 2004
Weblog
US Vote 2004
Interactive graphic
State by state guide to the elections
Archived articles
US elections 2004: archived articles
More US news and analysis
Special report: United States
Special report: US elections 2000
News guide
The US media
Useful links
Democratic National Committee
Republican National Committee
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。
