現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争４１ > 232.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争４１ > 232.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
この記事は非常に読み応えがある。要点をまとめると：
ケリー博士の死には以下のように明白に疑わしい点があるのに、ブレアの決定によって、ハットン委員会がすべて取り仕切るということになったため、きちんとした検死が行われなかった。（ケリー博士の死が報じられて半日も経過していない時点で、なぜ嘘つき小僧がハットン委員会の任命をあせったか、よ〜くわかった。）
(1)
第一発見者が発見した時点ではケリー博士の死体は木に寄りかかるような形で半身を起こした状態であったが、第一発見者は警察に知らせるために村に戻る途中でグレアム・コー刑事とその同僚2名にすれ違っている。その後知らせを受けた警官が現場に到着した時には、死体は仰向けになっていた。これからすればこのコー刑事の一行が細工したと考えるのが普通であるが、これは博士の死体は背中に死斑があったことを正当化するための細工と見られる。木に寄りかかった状態で死亡していたとしたら、背中に死斑があるのは不可解で、死亡時ないし死亡直後に仰向けの状態で放置されていたのでなければ背中に死斑はできない。これは博士は別の場所で殺害されて発見現場まで運搬されたことの確証となる。
(2)
コー刑事は同僚は1名しかいなかったと終始主張しているが、5名の目撃者はすべて他に2名が動向していたと言っている。残りの1名がその筋（暗殺関係）の専門家だった可能性は十分。またコー刑事はこの事件の担当ではなかったのになぜそこにいたのかも不明。コー刑事はThames Valley PoliceのTactical Support Major Incident（大事件支援活動）に従事していたとのことだが警察の記録では、同活動はケリー博士が死の散歩にでかける1時間前に開始され、翌朝の9：30に終了となっており、これは警察内部でOperation Mason（メーソン作戦）、と呼ばれているというのだから文字通り人を食った話である。暗殺が業務だったと疑われても仕方がない。コー刑事はその場には偶然居合わせた、で押し通しているようだが、最初からすべてを知っていたとしかいいようがない。
(3)
ケリー博士の死体の左手首の傷は尺骨動脈（小指の側に近い血管）が切断され、反対側のとう骨動脈は無傷だった。これが意味しているのはナイフは手首の内側（小指側）からナイフを当てたということで、これは試してみればわかるが非常に困難である。これは博士の左側から別の人物が手首を切ったとすればよく説明がつく。
(4)
救急隊員は「手首（動脈）を切ったにしては驚くほど出血量が少なかった。」と証言しているのに鑑識担当者（ハント博士：警察と契約関係で鑑識業務に従事）は大量の出血があったと証言している。どちらかがウソを着いている。前者の証言が正しいとすると、やはり他の場所で殺害されて、現場に運搬されたという以外説明がつかない。
(5)
不思議なことに誰も死後硬直の問題に言及していない。死亡時間を割り出す最有力要因だというのに。
これで自殺で押し切ろうというのだから、嘘つき小僧も良い度胸である。折から国防次官のケビン・テビットがケリー博士の名前をメディアに公表することを決定した会議は、嘘つき小僧が議長をつとめていたことを暴露したが、殺害を決定しなどという話にくらべれば蚊が刺したようなインパクトである。
英国では死刑は廃止されているが、小生の記憶が正しければ確か反逆罪は例外である。今回の嘘つき小僧の一連の行動・言動は間違いなく国益を著しく傷つけ、50人以上の英軍兵士の死亡を引き起こし（万単位といわれるイラク市民の死は別として）ているだけに反逆罪の適用で絞首台に吊されてもおかしくないと思うのだが。
http://www.rense.com/general43/kelly.htm
The Murder Of Dr. David Kelly
Part One of Two
Medium Rare
By Jim Rarey
10-14-3
=(This first part lays out the case from the evidence presented in the Hutton inquiry why the death of Dr. David Kelly was not by suicide. Part two will show the reasons, in this writerâs opinion, Dr. Kelly was killed.)
On Thursday, July 17th sometime between 3 and 3:30pm, Dr. David Kelly started out on his usual afternoon walk. About 18 hours later, searchers found his body, left wrist slit, in a secluded lane on Harrowdown Hill. Kelly, the UK's premier microbiologist, was in the center of a political maelstrom having been identified as the 'leak' in information about the 'dossier' Prime Minister Tony Blair had used to justify the war against Iraq.
While the Hutton inquiry appears set to declare Kelly's death a suicide and the national media are already treating it as a given, there are numerous red flags raised in the testimony and evidence at the inquiry itself.
Kelly's body was likely moved from where he died to the site where two search volunteers with a search dog found it. The body was propped up against a tree according to the testimony of both volunteers. The volunteers reported the find to police headquarters, Thames Valley Police (TVP) and then left the scene. On their way back to their car, they met three 'police' officers, one of them named Detective Constable Graham Peter Coe.
Coe and his men were alone at the site for 25-30 minutes before the first police actually assigned to search the area arrived (Police Constables Sawyer and Franklin) and took charge of the scene from Coe. They found the body flat on its back a short distance from the tree, as did all subsequent witnesses.
A logical explanation is that Dr. Kelly died at a different site and the body was transported to the place it was found. This is buttressed by the medical findings of livor mortis (post mortem lividity), which indicates that Kelly died on his back, or at least was moved to that position shortly after his death. Propping the body against the tree was a mistake that had to be rectified.
The search dog and its handler must have interrupted whoever was assigned to go back and move the body to its back before it was done. After the volunteers left the scene the body was moved to its back while DC Coe was at the scene.
Five witnesses said in their testimony that two men accompanied Coe. Yet, in his testimony, Coe maintained there was only one other beside himself. He was not questioned about the discrepancy.
Researchers, including this writer, assume the presence of the 'third man' could not be satisfactorily explained and so was being denied.
Additionally, Coe's explanation of why he was in the area is unsubstantiated. To the contrary, when PC Franklin was asked if Coe was part of the search team he responded, 'No. He was at the scene. I had no idea what he was doing there or why he was there. He was just at the scene when PC Sawyer and I arrived.'
Franklin was responsible for coordinating the search with the chief investigating officer and then turning it over to Sawyer to assemble the search team and take them to the assigned area. They were just starting to leave the station (about 9am on the 18th) to be the first search team on the ground (excepting the volunteers with the search dog) when they got word the body had been found.
A second red flag is the nature of the wounds on Kelly's wrist. Dr. Nicholas Hunt, who performed the autopsy, testified there were several superficial 'scratches' or cuts on the wrist and one deep wound that severed the ulnar artery but not the radial artery.
The fact that the ulnar artery was severed, but not the radial artery, strongly suggests that the knife wound was inflicted drawing the blade from the inside of the wrist (the little finger side closest to the body) to the outside where the radial artery is located much closer to the surface of the skin than is the ulnar artery. For those familiar with first aid, the radial artery is the one used to determine the pulse rate.
Just hold your left arm out with the palm up and see how difficult it would be to slash across the wrist avoiding the radial artery while severing the ulnar artery. However, a second person situated to the left of Kelly who held or picked up the arm and slashed across the wrist would start on the inside of the wrist severing the ulnar artery first.
A reasonably competent medical examiner or forensic pathologist would certainly be able to determine in which direction the knife was drawn across the wrist. That question was never asked nor the answer volunteered. In fact, a complete autopsy report would state in which direction the wounds were inflicted. The coronerâs inquest was never completed as it was preempted by the Hutton inquiry and the autopsy report will not be made public. Neither will the toxicology report.
Two paramedics who arrived by ambulance at the same time as Franklin and Sawyer (some time after 9am) and accompanied them to where the body was located. After checking the eyes and signs of a pulse or breathing, they attached four electro-cardiogram pads to Kelly's chest and hooked them up to a portable electro-cardiograph. When no signs of heart activity were found they unofficially confirmed death. One paramedic (Vanessa Hunt) said the Police asked them to leave the pads on the body. The other paramedic (David Bartlett) said they always left the pads on the body.
Both paramedics testified that DC Coe had two men with him. Curiously, both also volunteered that there was a surprisingly small amount of blood at the scene for an artery having been severed.
When the forensic pathologist (Dr. Nicholas Hunt) who performed the autopsy testified, he described copious amounts of blood at the scene. He also described scratches and bruises that Kelly 'stumbling around' in the heavy underbrush may have caused. He said there was no indication of a struggle or Kelly having been forcibly restrained.
However, the police made an extensive search of the area and found no indication of anyone, including Kelly, having been in the heavy underbrush.
Strangely, none of the witnesses mentioned anything about rigor mortis (stiffening of the body) which is useful in setting the approximate time of death. Even Dr. Hunt, when was asked directly what changes on the body he observed that would have happened after death, failed to mention rigor mortis. He only named livor mortis. Hunt set the time of death within a range of 4:15pm on the 17th to 1:15am the next morning. He based the estimate on body temperature which he did not take until 7:15pm on the 19th, some seven hours after he arrived on the scene.
A forensic biologist (Roy James Green) had been asked to examine the scene. He said the amount of blood he saw was consistent with a severed artery. Green works for the same private company (Forensic Alliance) as Dr. Hunt. A majority of the company's work is done for police organizations.
The afternoon of the 18th DC Coe turned up at the Kelly residence accompanied by a man identified only as 'an attachment,' who acted as an 'exhibits officer' presumably collecting documents in behalf of some other government agency.
Detective Constable Coe and those accompanying him are somewhat of a mystery. There are no corroborating witnesses to any of his actions to which he testified (other than 'just being there' at the scene where the body was found).
However, on a listing of evidence provided to the Hutton inquiry by Thames Valley Police is a reference to a document described thusly, 'TVP Tactical Support Major Incident Policy Book·Between 1430 17.07.03 and 930 18.07.03. DCI Alan Young. It is labeled ãnot for release - Police operational information.' Many of the exhibits are labeled that way or are not to be released as personal information.
The police took over 300 statements from witnesses but less than 70 were forwarded to the Hutton inquiry. Witness statements were not to be released (even to the inquiry) unless the witness signed an authorization permitting it. TVP also withheld witness interviews they did not consider 'relevant' to the inquiry. Witnesses were not put under oath so it is impossible for the public to know if their public statements are at variance with what they told police. The 'tactical support' document must have been considered relevant to the inquiry on Kelly's death or it wouldn't have been forwarded.
So this 'tactical support' began at 2:30pm on the 17th, about one hour before Dr. Kelly left the house on his final walk. It ended at 9:30am the following morning about the time DC Coe and his men left the death scene. The obvious question is, to what was TVP giving tactical support? The name given the effort was 'Operation Mason.'
(In part two of this report, we will lay out some of the reasons (that you won't see in the national media) Dr. Kelly could not be allowed to live.)
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.) Disclaimer Email This Article
Permission is granted to reproduce this article in its entirety.
The author is a freelance writer based in Romulus, Michigan. He is a former newspaper editor and investigative reporter, a retired customs administrator and accountant, and a student of history and the U.S. Constitution.
If you would like to receive Medium Rare articles directly, please contact the author at
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。