現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争３９ > 415.html
★阿修羅♪
|
現在地 HOME > 掲示板
> 戦争３９ > 415.html
★阿修羅♪
|
|
●共同通信が伝えた最新記事によれば、チェイニー副大統領「の補佐官が、
今年２月のパウエル国務長官の国連演説に、この情報を挿入しようと
した」と『ワシントン・ポスト』紙が報じたとのこと。
このあたりの事情については、以下のような情報を総合すると興味深い
背景や実態が見えてきます。
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://asyura.com/sora/war1/msg/154.html
戦争・国際情勢 投稿NO:154 2001/9/13 06:44:17
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
題 名: 米国テロ事件の興味ぶかい“影響”
●興味ぶかい分析を見つけたので紹介しておきます。
記事の表題は――
「ビン・ラディン主犯説は色褪せはじめ、ロイターやCNNは全世界不況を予告し、各国中央銀行は石油や金の思惑買いを阻止するために巨額の資金投入を行なってインフレに火を付ける恐れが出てきた」。
とりあえず原文だけを提示しますが、この記事で興味ぶかかったのは、米国政府がすでに「ビン・ラディン主犯説」から「イラク主犯説」に切り替え始めている、という指摘。
（以下略）
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://asyura.com/sora/war1/msg/201.html
戦争・国際情勢 投稿NO:201 2001/9/14 03:54:56
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
題 名: イスラエルの諜報当局が「米国攻撃にイラクが資金供与」と発表
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://asyura.com/sora/war1/msg/241.html
戦争・国際情勢 投稿NO:241 2001/9/14 22:15:03
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
題 名: １９９３年当時の世界貿易センタービル爆破事件の「テロリスト」容疑者と、CIAおよびFBIとの腐れ縁
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://asyura.com/sora/war3/msg/896.html
戦争・国際情勢３ 投稿NO:896 2001/10/26 21:20:21
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
題 名: イスラエルが対テロ戦争支援でワシントンにモサド部隊をこっそり派遣
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.asyura.com/2003/war23/msg/243.html
WA23 243 2003/2/04 23:12:22
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
題 名: ブッシュの取り巻きたちは５年前にすでにイラク侵攻計画をクリントンに突きつけていた
----------------------------------------------------------------
パウエル長官の２月５日の国連プレゼンテーションの草稿はイスラエル政府が準備したもの（ラルーシュのＥＩＲからの転載記事）
http://www.asyura.com/2003/bd24/msg/458.html
S24 458 2003/2/21 09:49:31
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
シラク仏大統領を「蛆虫」呼ばわりするデマゴギー策動の背景
http://www.asyura.com/2003/war24/msg/568.html
WA24 568 2003/2/22 06:16:04
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
「イラクが大量破壊兵器を保有している」という戦争正当化の根拠をデッチ上げようとするインチキプロパガンダへの批判記事
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war30/msg/131.html
WA30 131 2003/4/02 07:51:49
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦 ----------------------------------------------------------------
“UNゲイト”事件発覚！――アメリカ小ブッシュ政権が企てた国連盗聴陰謀が発覚した
http://www.asyura.com/2003/war24/msg/1339.html
WA24 1339 2003/3/02 20:09:46
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
欧州連合本部でフランスやドイツなどを標的にした盗聴システムが発見された(AFP)
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war26/msg/317.html
WA26 317 2003/3/20 01:35:23
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
米国の統一教会系新聞『ワシントンタイムズ』が欧州安保協力機構担当大使を騙る虚偽投稿を掲載
http://www.asyura.com/0306/war37/msg/150.html
WA37 150 2003/7/18 02:41:27
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●ついでに、PNACの連中の本質的な卑劣さも、すでに周知の事実。
----------------------------------------------------------------
【Shit and Oh！】小ブッシュ政権を牛耳る戦争扇動“チンポコ集団”(PNAC)は兵役逃れの包茎野郎ばかりだった!!
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war28/msg/158.html
WA28 158 2003/3/25 11:05:44
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●但し、これを報じた『ワシントン・ポスト』だって、イラク侵略戦争の
ときには翼賛報道をせっせとしていたのですから、やはり距離を置き
ながら観察するしかありません。（安直に真に受けるのは禁物だって
ことです。）
----------------------------------------------------------------
戦争翼賛メディア『ワシントン・ポスト』本社前で抗議の“ダイイン”が行なわれる
http://www.asyura.com/2003/war25/msg/872.html
WA25 872 2003/3/13 20:44:09
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●ところでイラク侵略戦争のさなかに、アラブ世界のメディアにこんな
未確認情報が出ました。これは案外、ネオコン陰謀勢力への一方的
な非難を和らげるための巧妙なデマだったのかも知れません。
----------------------------------------------------------------
【本当か？】チェイニー米国副大統領の娘も含む「米国政府代表団」がイラク政府との「即時停戦交渉」のため中東入り
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war29/msg/289.html
WA29 289 2003/3/28 01:46:30
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●今回の『ワシントン・ポスト』記事（とそれをオウム返しにした
共同通信記事）にはモハメド・アッタ容疑者の件が言及されて
いますが、その背後に米国の影があったことも周知の事実。
----------------------------------------------------------------
９・11事変の「主犯」とされるモハメド・アッタは、90年代の大部分を通じて米独政府合同事業に雇われていたことが発覚
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war32/msg/869.html
WA32 869 2003/4/24 20:18:11
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
【英文記事集成】9・11事変のドイツにおける真相究明のあゆみ(シカゴ・トリビューン記事から)
http://www.asyura.com/0304/war32/msg/875.html
WA32 875 2003/4/24 23:36:13
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●さて、今回の共同通信記事ですが、これはネタ元になった『ワシントン・
ポスト』の記事を読んでみると、大事な指摘が抜け落ちていることが
わかります。『ワシントン・ポスト』では、チェイニー副大統領が
（小ブッシュやラムズルドやライスが「9/11事変とイラクとのつながり」
を公然と否定した今になっても）相変わらず「9/11攻撃の背後にイラクあり」
という陰謀説に固執しているという指摘から始まっています。ところが
この大事な部分が共同通信記事からは完全に抜けています。
----------------------------------------------------------------
ラムズフェルド国防長官と小ブッシュ大統領は「フセインに9/11関与の証拠なし」と宣言したのだが……
http://www.asyura.com/0310/war39/msg/140.html
WA39 140 2003/9/22 16:00:24
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
【補足】小ブッシュ政権のトップが「9/11事変へのイラク関与」説から距離を置きだした経緯
http://www.asyura.com/0310/war39/msg/241.html
WA39 241 2003/9/24 22:56:30
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
米国の“特別査察愚連隊”が「やっぱりイラクには大量破壊兵器の証拠はない」と中間報告（但し最終逆転もありうる）
http://www.asyura.com/0310/war39/msg/271.html
WA39 271 2003/9/25 21:15:56
投稿者: 佐藤雅彦
----------------------------------------------------------------
●つまり、小ブッシュの周辺は、すでに“成功”したネオコン勢力の
「サダム体制の首狩り」陰謀の汚れ役になったチェイニーを“屠ら
れた子羊”（笑）に仕立てて決着を付ける方向に動きだしたようでも
あり、よかれあしかれ『ワシントン・ポスト』がそのシナリオの
プロパガンダ装置として働いているというわけです。
この現局面において重大な政治文脈を無視して、いまさら国連パウエル
演説をめぐるインチキ工作やアッタ容疑者（「死人(？)に口なし」の
欠席裁判なんて愚劣なカルト宗教儀式以上の意味はない）を利用した
デマ工作のことを二、三行書いたって、そんなものは報道と呼ぶ価値も
ないんじゃないのかな。
▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼
（共同通信）[9月29日16時5分更新]
米長官演説への挿入画策 中枢テロめぐる未確認情報
【ワシントン２９日共同】２９日付の米紙ワシントン・ポストは、米中枢同時テロ実行犯とイラク人工作員の接触の事実が確認できないにもかかわらず、チェイニー副大統領の補佐官が、今年２月のパウエル国務長官の国連演説に、この情報を挿入しようとしたと報じた。
問題の情報は、中枢テロ５カ月前の２００１年春、実行犯の中心人物モハメド・アタ被告と、イラク人工作員がプラハで接触していたとの目撃情報が発端。同年１１月にチェコ内相が２人の接触を公言し、以降、連邦捜査局（ＦＢＩ）や中央情報局（ＣＩＡ）が調査してきた。
同紙によると、今年初め米国に拘束された工作員は実行犯との接触を否定。チェコ政府も昨年、接触を確認する「証拠はない」と米側に伝えている。
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
●上記の共同通信の“半端らフレイズ・レポート”（笑）のネタ元です。
▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼▼
『ワシントン・ポスト』（2003年9月28日付）
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14901-2003Sep28.html
Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked By Cheney
By Dana Priest and Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, September 29, 2003; Page A01
In making the case for war against Iraq, Vice President Cheney has continued to suggest that an Iraqi intelligence agent met with a Sept. 11, 2001, hijacker five months before the attacks, even as the story was falling apart under scrutiny by the FBI, CIA and the foreign government that first made the allegation.
The alleged meeting in Prague between hijacker Mohamed Atta and Iraqi Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani was the single thread the administration has pointed to that might tie Iraq to the attacks. But as the Czech government distanced itself from its initial assertion and American investigators determined Atta was probably in the United States at the time of the meeting, other administration officials dropped the incident from their public statements about Iraq.
Not Cheney, who was the administration's most vociferous advocate for going to war with Iraq. He brought up the connection between Atta and al-Ani again two weeks ago in an appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" in which he also suggested links between Iraq and the Sept. 11 attacks.
Cheney described Iraq as "the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11." Neither the CIA nor the congressional joint inquiry that investigated the assault on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon found any evidence linking Iraq to the hijackers or the attacks. President Bush corrected Cheney's statement several days later.
Cheney's staff also waged a campaign to include the allegation in Secretary of State Colin L. Powell's speech to the United Nations in February in which he made the administration's case for war against Iraq. Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, pressed Powell's speechwriters to include the Atta claim and other suspected links between Iraq and terrorism, according to senior and mid-level administration officials involved in crafting the speech.
When State Department and CIA officials complained about Libby's proposed language and suggested cutting large sections, Cheney's associates fought back. "Every piece offered . . . they fought tooth and nail to keep it in," said one official involved in putting together the speech.
The vice president's role in keeping the alleged meeting in Prague before the public eye is an illustration of the administration's handling of intelligence reports in the run-up to the war, when senior officials sometimes seized on reports that bolstered the case against Iraq despite contradictory evidence provided by the U.S. intelligence community.
Cheney's office declined to comment. Mary Matalin, a former senior aide to Cheney who still provides the vice president with advice, said Cheney's job is to focus on "the big picture." His appearance on "Meet the Press" on Sept. 14, she said, was intended to "remind people that Iraq is part of a bigger war that will require patience and sacrifice."
Cheney does not fully vet his speeches or public statements with the CIA or the wider intelligence community for accuracy, according to several administration officials, but usually gives the CIA a list of possible points or facts that might be used in a speech or appearance.
Matalin said Cheney "doesn't base his opinion on one piece of data," but has access to information that cannot be declassified because it would harm national security or compromise sources. "His job is to connect the dots in a way to prevent the worst possible case from happening," she said, but in public "he has to tiptoe through landmines of what's sayable and not sayable."
The claim that Atta, an Egyptian and Sept. 11 hijacker, had met with al-Ani in early April 2001 has been a constant element of the vice president's case against Iraq. Surveillance cameras at the Radio Free Europe building in Prague had picked up al-Ani, an intelligence officer at the Iraq embassy, surveying the building in April, five months before the Sept. 11 attacks. The tape was made available to Czech intelligence. Al-Ani was expelled at the U.S. government's request soon afterward for conduct incompatible with his diplomatic status.
In October 2001, after pictures of Atta had circulated publicly, an Arab student who worked as an informant for BIS, the Czech Security Information Service, told the service he had seen Atta meeting with al-Ani in April.
That November, Stanislav Gross, the Czech Republic's interior minister, said publicly that al-Ani and Atta had met in Prague. A short while later, Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman told Powell that the two had discussed targeting the Radio Free Europe building, not the Sept. 11 targets.
On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."
But that same month, Czech President Vaclav Havel was retreating from the more definitive accounts provided by his government, saying there was "a 70 percent" chance the meeting took place. Indeed, while Czech officials never officially backed away from their initial stance, officials at various agencies say that, privately, the Czechs have discredited the accuracy of the untested informant who came to them with the information. According to one report, Havel quietly informed the White House in 2002 there was no evidence to confirm the meeting.
The Czechs had reviewed records using Atta's name and his seven known aliases provided by the CIA and found nothing to confirm the April 2001 trip. Meanwhile, CIA and FBI officials were running down thousands of leads on Atta and the other 18 hijackers involved in the Sept. 11 plot.
U.S. records showed Atta living in Virginia Beach in April 2001, and they could find no indication he had left Virginia or traveled outside the United States.
Even so, on March 24, 2002, Cheney again told NBC, "We discovered . . . the allegation that one of the lead hijackers, Mohamed Atta, had, in fact, met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague."
A few weeks later, in April, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III told a San Francisco audience, "We ran down literally hundreds of thousands of leads and checked every record we could get our hands on, from flight reservations to car rentals to bank accounts." The FBI, he said, could find no evidence that Atta left or returned to the United States at the time.
In May, senior FBI and CIA analysts, having scoured thousands of travel records, concluded "there was no evidence Atta left or returned to the U.S.," according to officials at the time.
But on Sept. 8, 2002, Cheney, again on "Meet the Press," said that Atta "did apparently travel to Prague. . . . We have reporting that places him in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence officer a few months before the attacks on the World Trade Center."
"What does the CIA say about that?" asked host Tim Russert. "Is it credible?"
"It's credible," Cheney replied. "But, you know, I think the way to put it would be it's unconfirmed at this point."
As war loomed closer, the Atta allegation generally began to disappear from the administration's public case against Iraq. Bush did not mention Atta or the Prague meeting in his Jan. 28 State of the Union address, when he sought to show Iraq's links to terrorism.
But behind the scenes, the Atta meeting remained tantalizing to Cheney and his staff. Libby -- along with deputy national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, a longtime Cheney associate -- began pushing to include the Atta claim in Powell's appearance before the U.N. Security Council a week after the State of the Union speech. Powell's presentation was aimed at convincing the world of Iraq's ties to terrorists and its pursuit of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
On Jan. 25, with a stack of notebooks at his side, color-coded with the sources for the information, Libby laid out the potential case against Iraq to a packed White House situation room. "We read [their proposal to include Atta] and some of us said, 'Wow! Here we go again,' " said one official who helped draft the speech. "You write it. You take it out, and then it comes back again."
Libby described the material as a "Chinese menu," simply the broadest range of options, according to several administration officials. "The papers were designed to assist [Powell's] preparation by organizing a lot of materials so that he could choose the order and evidence he found most compelling, although some of it, in the end, could not be declassified," said one administration official.
But other officials present said they felt that Libby's presentation was over the top, that the wording was too aggressive and most of the material could not be used in a public forum. Much of it, in fact, unraveled when closely examined by intelligence analysts from other agencies and, in the end, was largely discarded.
"After one day of hearing screams about who put this together and what are the sources, we essentially threw it out," one official present said.
Cheney's staff did not entirely give up. Late into the night before Powell's presentation, Libby called Powell's staff, waiting at the United Nations in New York, to question why certain material was not being included in the terrorism section, according to two State Department officials.
Earlier this month, on his most recent "Meet the Press" appearance, Cheney once again used Atta to subtly suggest a connection between Iraq and Sept. 11, 2001.
"With respect to 9/11, of course, we've had the story . . . the Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we've never been able to develop anymore of that yet, either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it."
Defense and intelligence officials say al-Ani, who was apprehended by U.S. forces earlier this year, has denied meeting with Atta.
Research editor Margot Williams contributed to this report.
----------------------------------------------------------------
【写真】 http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/images/I15208-2003Sep28L
Minutes after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack, Vice President Cheney was in the operations center with his chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, far right, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, center left, and his wife, Lynne Cheney, far left. (White House Photo David Bohrer)
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
題名には必ず「阿修羅さんへ」と記述してください。