現在地 HOME > 掲示板 > 戦争35 > 416.html ★阿修羅♪ |
|
(回答先: ネオコン改め疑似保守派(pseudcon)団長、ウオルフウッィッツが、今度はイラク「戦争」の選択を石油と明言。 投稿者 木村愛二 日時 2003 年 6 月 05 日 18:54:39)
元記事のURL http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,970331,00.html
*国防省のウェブサイト http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030531-depsecdef0246.html
以下のエディターの注釈をつけて、ガーディアンの元記事を全文転載しています。
Editors Note
The Guardian has removed this article from their website and has posted the following:
A report which was posted on our website on June 4 under the heading "Wolfowitz:
Iraq war was about oil" misconstrued remarks made by the US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, making it appear that he had said that oil was the main reason for going to war in Iraq.
He did not say that.
He said, according to the *Department of Defence website , "The ... difference between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil.
In the case of North Korea, the country is teetering on the edge of economic collapse and that I believe is a major point of leverage whereas the military picture with North Korea is very different from that with Iraq."
The sense was clearly that the US had no economic options by means of which to achieve its objectives, not that the economic value of the oil motivated the war.
The report appeared only on the website and has now been removed.
http://www.commondreams.org
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0604-10.htm